Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T13:34:15.587Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studying Sonorous Objects to Develop Frameworks for Improvisation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 November 2017

Sam Mcauliffe
Sam Mcauliffe*
Affiliation:
Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

French musique concrète artist Pierre Schaeffer pioneered new ways of listening to and studying sound. His study and manipulation of recorded sounds to create music changed the way contemporary musicians, from a multitude of disciplines, approach making music. Additionally, Schaeffer’s treatise on acousmatic listening to sonorous objects has deeply influenced contemporary sound studies. In this article, I elucidate how musique concrète has informed my practice-led research project, Looking Awry – from which I will discuss two case studies. I outline how acousmatic listening to field recordings from everyday environments informed the development of performance strategies that guide improvised musical performance; a malleable practice that can be applied to a variety of performance settings.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 22 , Special Issue 3: Which Words Can We Use Related to Sound and Music? , December 2017 , pp. 369 - 377
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

abc.net.au 2015. www.abc.net.au/arts/adlib/stories/s857584.htm (accessed 10 September 2017).Google Scholar
Battier, M. 2007. What the GRM Brought to Music: From Musique Concrète to Acousmatic Music. Organised Sound 12(3): 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, C. and Warner, D., eds. 2010. Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music. New York: Continuum International Publishers Group.Google Scholar
Cross, F. L. and Livingstone, E. A. 1974. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisenstein, S. 1949. Film Form: Essays in Film Theory, trans J. Leyda. London: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Hegarty, P. 2007. Noise/Music: A History. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Herrmann, M. 2015. Unsound Phenomenologies: Harrison, Schaeffer and the Sound Object. Organised Sound 20(3): 300–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahn, D. 1999. Noise, Water, Meat: A History of Sound in the Arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBelle, B. 2015. Background Noise: Perspectives on Sound Art. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 2014. Phenomenology of Perception, trans D. A. Landes. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Neuhaus, M. 2011. Listen (1966–76). In C. Kelly (ed.) Sound. London: Whitechapel Gallery.Google Scholar
Pressing, J. 1984. Cognitive Processes in Improvisation. In A. J. Chapman and W. R. Crozier (eds.) Cognitive Processes in the Perception of Art. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Robindoré, B. and Ferrari, L. 1998. Luc Ferrari: Interview with an Intimate Iconclast. Computer Music Journal 22(3): 8–16.Google Scholar
Rose, J. 2013. The Music of Place: Reclaiming a Practice. Platform Papers: Quarterly Essays on the Performing Arts no. 35 (May). Strawberry Hills, NSW: Currency House.Google Scholar
Rose, J. 2015. A Few Thoughts on the Language of Improvisation. www.jonroseweb.com/c_articles_lang_of_impro.html (accessed 10 September 2017).Google Scholar
Russolo, L. 1986; orig. pub. 1913. The Art of Noises, trans B. Barclay: New York: Pendragon Press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 2010. Acousmatics. trans D. W. Smith. In C. Cox and D. Warner (eds.) Audio Culture: Readings in Modern Music. New York: Continuum International Publishers Group.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 2017; orig. pub. 1966 Treatise on Musical Objects: Essays across Disciplines. trans by C. North and J. Dack (Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, R. M. 1977. The Soundscape: Our Sonic Environment and the Tuning of the World. Vermont: Destiny Books.Google Scholar
Schön, D. A. 1983. The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Tate, H. 1924. Australian Musical Possibilities. Melbourne: Edward A. Vidler.Google Scholar
Voegelin, S. 2013. Listening to Noise and Silence: Towards a Philosophy of Sound Art. London and New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar

Discography

AMM. 1967. AMMMusic 1966. Elektra Records, CD.Google Scholar
Denley, J. 2006. Through Fire, Crevice + the Hidden Valley. Splitrec, CD.Google Scholar
Eno, B. 1982. Ambient 4: On Land. E. G. Records, CD.Google Scholar
Ferrari, L. 1970. Presque Rien No.1/Société II. Deutsche Grammophon, LP.Google Scholar
Nurse with Wound. 2003. Soliloquy for Lilith. United Dairies, CD.Google Scholar
Sonny Rollins Quartet. 1956. Tenor Madness. Prestige Records, CD.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Mcauliffe supplementary material

Sound files

Download Mcauliffe supplementary material(File)
File 17.8 MB