Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:09:21.844Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spatial Perception and Cognition in Multichannel Audio for Electroacoustic Music

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2010

Gary S. Kendall
Gary S. Kendall*
Affiliation:
Sonic Arts Research Centre, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Listeners experience electroacoustic music as full of significance and meaning, and they experience spatiality as one of the factors contributing to its meaningfulness. If we want to understand spatiality in electroacoustic music, we must understand how the listener’s mental processes give rise to the experience of meaning. In electroacoustic music as in everyday life, these mental processes unite the peripheral auditory system with human spatial cognition. In the discussion that follows we consider a range of the listener’s mental processes relating space and meaning from the perceptual attributes of spatial imagery to the spatial reference frames for places and navigation. When considering multichannel loudspeaker systems in particular, an important part of the discussion is focused on the distinctive and idiomatic ways in which this particular mode of sound production contributes to and situates meaning. These include the phenomenon of image dispersion, the important consequences of the precedence effect and the influence of source characteristics on spatial imagery. These are discussed in close relation to the practicalities of artistic practice and to the potential for artistic meaning experienced by the listener.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 15 , Issue 3: Sound ↔ Space: New approaches to multichannel music and audio , December 2010 , pp. 228 - 238
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Adair, S., Alcorn, M., Corrigan, C. 2008. A Study Into the Perception of Envelopment in Electroacoustic Music. Proceedings of the 2008 International Computer Music Conference. Belfast: ICMA.Google Scholar
Bass, S. 2010. Personal correspondence.Google Scholar
Berg, J., Rumsey, F. 2003. Systematic Evaluation of Perceived Spatial Quality. Proceedings of the AES 24th International Conference. 26–28 June, Banff: 184–98.Google Scholar
Blauert, J. 1971. Localization and the Law of the First Wavefront in the Median Plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 50(2): 466–470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blauert, J., Col, J.P. 1992. Irregularities in the Precedence Effect. In Y. Cazals, L. Damany and K. Horner (eds.), Auditory Physiology and Perception. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 531–538.Google Scholar
Bloom, P.J. 1977. Creating Source Elevation by Spectral Manipulation. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 25: 560–565.Google Scholar
Braasch, J., Blauert, J., Djelani, T. 2003. The Precedence Effect For Noise Bursts of Different Bandwidths. I. Psychoacoustic data. Acoustical Science and Technology 24(5): 233–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clozier, Christian. 2001. The Gmelaphone Concept and the Cybernephone Instrument, trans. Justice Olsson. Computer Music Journal 25(4): 81–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerson, S. 1998. Aural Landscape: Musical Space. Organised Sound 3(2): 135–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etlinger, D. 2009. A Musically Motivated Approach to Spatial Audio for Large Venues. PhD dissertation. Evanston, IL, Northwestern University.Google Scholar
Gayou, E. 2007. The GRM: Landmarks on a Historic Route. Organised Sound 12(3): 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gregorio, S.C.B. 2009. Spatial Impression Effect in a Performance Situation: Multi-Channel Reproduction System and Early Reflections Sound Processing. Masters report. Sonic Arts Research Centre, Queen’s University Belfast.Google Scholar
Haas, H. 1951. On the Influence of a Single Echo on the Intelligibility of Speech. Acustica 1: 49–58.Google Scholar
Harrison, Jonty. 1999. Sound, Space, Sculpture: Some Thoughts on the ‘What’, ‘How’ and ‘Why’ of Sound Diffusion. Organised Sound 3(2): 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, W.M., Rakerd, B. 1989. Localization of Sound in Rooms IV: The Franssen Effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 86(4): 1,366–1373.Google Scholar
Holman, T. 2008. Surround Sound Up and Running. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, G. 1995. The Decorrelation of Audio Signals and its Impact on Spatial Imagery. Computer Music Journal 19(4): 71–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, G. 2007. The Artistic Play of Spatial Organization: Spatial Attributes, Scene Analysis and Auditory Spatial Schemata. Proceedings of the 2007 International Computer Music Conference. Copenhagen: ICMA.Google Scholar
Kendall, G. 2008. What is an Event? The Event Schema, Circumstances, Metaphor and Gist. Proceedings of the 2008 International Computer Music Conference. Belfast: ICMA.Google Scholar
Kendall, G. 2010. Meaning in Electroacoustic Music and the Everyday Mind. Organised Sound 15(1): 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Litovsky, R., Colburn, H.S., Yost, W.A., Guzman, S.J. 1999. The Precedence Effect. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106(4): 1,633–1654.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, G., Woszczyk, W., Corey, J., Quesnel, R. 1999. Sound Source Localization in a Five-Chanel Surround Sound Reproduction System. Preprint No. 4994. Audio Engineering Society 107th Convention.Google Scholar
Ootomo, J., Tanno, K., Saji, A., Huang, J., Hatano, W. 2007. The Precedence Effect of Sound From Side Direction. Audio Engineering Society 30th International Conference, Saariselkä, Finland.Google Scholar
Perrott, D.R., Strybel, T.Z., Manligas, C.L. 1987. Conditions Under Which the Haas Precedence Effect May Or May Not Occur. Journal of Auditory Research 27: 59–72.Google Scholar
Rakerd, B., Hartmann, W.H. 1986. Localization of Sound in Rooms. III. Onset and Duration Effects. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80(6): 1,695–1706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ratliff, P.A. 1974. Properties of Hearing Related to Quadraphonic Reproduction. BBC Research Department No. 38.Google Scholar
Roffler, S.K., Butler, R.A. 1968a. Localization on Tonal Stimuli in the Vertical Plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 43: 1,260–1266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roffler, S.K., Butler, R.A. 1968b. Factors that Influence the Localization of Sound in the Vertical Plane. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 43: 1,255–1259.Google Scholar
Rumsey, F. 2002. Spatial Quality Evaluation for Reproduced Sound: Terminology, Meaning, and a Scene-Based Paradigm. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 50(9): 651–666.Google Scholar
Simon, L.S.R., Mason, R., Rumsey, F. 2009. Localisation Curves for a Regularly-Spaced Octagon Loudspeaker Array. Audio Engineering Society 127th Convention, Preprint No. 7915.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 2007. Space-Form and the Acousmatic Image. Organised Sound 12(1): 35–58.Google Scholar
Susnik, R., Sodnik, J., Tomazic, S. 2005. Coding of Elevation in Acoustic Image of Space. Acoustics: Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Australian Acoustical Society 2005: 145–50.Google Scholar
Taylor, H., Tversky, B. 1996. Perspective in Spatial Descriptions. Journal of Memory and Language 35: 371–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teruggi, D. 2007. Technology and Musique Concrete: The Technical Developments of the Groupe de Recherches Musicales and Their Implication in Musical Composition. Organised Sound 12(3): 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theile, G., Plenge, G. 1977. Localization of Lateral Phantom Sources. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24(4): 196–200.Google Scholar
Thinus-Blanc, C., Gaunet, F. 1997. Representation of Space in Blind Persons: Vision as a Spatial Sense? Psychological Bulletin 121(1): 20–42.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toop, Richard. 1981. Stockhausen’s Electronic Works: Sketches and Worksheets from 1952–1967. Interface 10: 149–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treib, Marc. 1996. Space Calculated in Seconds: The Philips Pavilion, Le Corbusier, Edgard Varèse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tversky, B. 1993. Cognitive Maps, Cognitive Collages, and Spatial Mental Models. In A.U. Frank and I. Campari (eds.), Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Tversky, B. 2009. Spatial Cognition, Embodied and Situated. In P. Robbins and M. Aydede (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Situated Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 201–217.Google Scholar
Wallach, H., Newman, E.B., Rosenzweig, M.R. 1949. The Precedence Effect in Sound Localization. American Journal of Psychology 57: 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zacharov, N., Koivuniemi, K. 2001. Unraveling the Perception of Spatial Sound Reproduction. Proceedings of the AES 19th International Conference, Schloss Emlau, Germany.Google Scholar