Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:04:55.970Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Material and Medium: An examination of sound recycling in Oval’s 94 diskont

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 September 2019

Neil O Connor
Neil O Connor*
Affiliation:
Digital Media Arts Research Centre, Department of Computer Science and Information Systems, University of Limerick, Ireland
*
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Reproduction (playback) is responsible for the presentation of the full spectrum of sound character captured during the recording process. The control of this and the faithfulness to an original sound has informed modern sound aesthetics. Current modes of reproduction, such as streaming, see the listener more interested in an approximate presentation of sound, rather than a broad and more psychoacoustically pleasing one. In the sonic arts, the practice of sound recycling and its associated methodologies, reproduction is re-contextualised, involving material that is borrowed, reworked and often disconnected from its source. Such issues are considered in this article through the examination of sound recycling in 94 diskont (1995), an album produced by the German act Oval. By studying the use of material and medium in the work, an attempt is made to discuss approaches to sound recycling through conceptual frameworks proposed by Bregman, Deleuze, Guattari and Smalley to provide a forum towards the interpretation of sound recycling in wider sonic arts practices.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 24 , Issue 2: Borrowing, Quotation, Sampling and Plundering , August 2019 , pp. 157 - 163
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Agus, T. R., Thorpe, S. J. and Pressnitzer, D. 2010. Rapid Formation of Robust Auditory Memories: Insights from Noise. Neuron 66: 610–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Attali, J. 1985. Noise: The Political Economy of Music. Minneapolis MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Barrett, N. 2017. Trends in Electroacoustic Music. In Collins, N. and d’Escrivan, N. J. (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Electronic Music. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beaudoin, R. 2007. Counterpoint and Quotation in Ussachevsky’s Wireless Fantasy. Organised Sound 12 (2): 143–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackburn, M. 2011. The Visual Sound-Shapes of Spectromorphology: An Illustrative Guide to Composition. Organised Sound 16(1): 5–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bossis, B. 2006. The Analysis of Electroacoustic Music: From Sources to Invariants. Organised Sound 11(2): 101–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bosseur, J. 1996. Installation and Technology. In Motte-Haber, H. (ed.) Klangkunst. Labber: Labbe Verlag.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. 1987. What Makes a Social Class? On The Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups. Berkeley Journal of Sociology, 32, 1–17.Google Scholar
Bregman, A. 1990. Auditory Scene Analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, W. F. and Treyens, J. C. 1981. Role of schemata in Memory for Places. Cognitive Psychology 13(2): 207–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchanan, I. and Swiboda, M. (eds.) 2004. Deleuze and Music. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh Press.Google Scholar
Cascone, K. 2000. Aesthetics of Failure: Post-Digital Tendencies in Contemporary Computer Music. Computer Music Journal 24(4): 12–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Church, S. H. 2017. Against the Tyranny of Musical Form: Glitch music, Affect, and the Sound of Digital Malfunction. Critical Studies in Media Communication 34(4): 315–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F. 1987. A Thousand Plateaus. Minnesota: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Parnet, C. 2007. Dialogues II. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
De Landa, M. 2016. Assemblage Theory. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 1986. The Language of Electroacoustic Music. Reading: Harwood Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frith, S. 1996. Music and Identity. In Hall, S. and Du Gay, P. (eds.) Questions of Cultural Identity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. K. 2002. Writing Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1977. The Question Concerning Technology. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Keep, A. 2006. Instrumentalizing: Approaches to Improvising with Sounding Objects in Experimental Music. In Saunders, J. (ed.) The Ashgate Research Companion to Experimental Music. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Kirschenbaum, M. G. 2007. Mechanisms – New Media and Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaBelle, B. 2017. Restless Acoustics, Emergent Publics. In Cobussen, M., Meelberg, V. and Truax, B. (eds.) Routledge Companion to Sounding Art. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Long, D. R. 1989. Second Language Listening Comprehension: A Schema-Theoretic Perspective. The Modern Language Journal 73 (1): 32–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maes, L. and Lerman, M. 2017. Defining Sound Art. In Cobussen, M., Meelberg, V. and Truax, B. (eds.) Routledge Companion to Sounding Art. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Peters, J. D. 1999. Speaking into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, S. 1996. Low End Theories. The Wire, 146: 26–30.Google Scholar
Rissett, J. C. 2005. Horacia Vaggione: Towards a Syntax of Sound. Contemporary Music Review 24(4): 297–93.Google Scholar
Rogers, T. 2012. Towards a Feminist Historiography of Electronic Music. In Sterne, J. (ed.) The Sound Studies Reader. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rost, M. 2001. Listening. In Carter, R. and Nunan, D. (eds.) Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 2012. In Search of a Concrete Music. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1997. Spectromorphology: Explaining Sound-Shapes. Organised Sound 2(2): 107–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stivale, C. 2005. Gilles Deleuze – Key Concepts. Ontario: McGill-Queen’s University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, B. 2001. Music and Memory: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ussachevsky, V. 1977. Random Thoughts on Creative Collaboration with Machines. In 1952 – Electronic Tape Music by Vladimir Ussachevsky and Otto Luening: The First Compositions. New York: Highgate Press.Google Scholar
Virilio, P. 2003. Art and Fear, trans. Julie, Rose. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar