Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:47:11.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Ephemeral Architecture of Stockhausen’s Pole für 2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2010

Michael Fowler*
Affiliation:
Spatial Information Architecture Laboratory, RMIT University, 77 Barnett Street, Kensington, Victoria, 3031, Australia

Abstract

Stockhausen’s graphically notated Pole für 2 was created for the multi-channel diffusion system in the spherical auditorium at the German pavilion at the Osaka World’s Fair in 1970. The work is remarkable for the way in which spatiality is explored through new developments in graphic notation – both for three-dimensional and sound projection, and to indicate musical imitation and transformation of short-wave radio signals. These two notational systems unite through the synchronous unfolding of time in Pole, and similarly through the spatial structure of auditorium’s architecture that housed over 50 loudspeakers in 6 layers. By using the sound projection score as the basis for the construction of a NURBS (non-uniform rational B-spline) model, each of the player’s sound projection geometries within the auditorium can be transmediated, thus allowing for a visual representation of the spatial design of the work. Examining the topology of the models produced from the work’s six sections further allows for emergent architectonic characteristics of volume, manifold and envelope to be tracked, thus pointing to Stockhausen’s characterisation of design space. The strong connection of the work to the auditorium’s spherical structure also points to the nature of the composer’s sound design as one predicated on the ability of patterns of sound projection to articulate tangible space, and therefore produce ephemeral aural architectures.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Benson, Robert. 1987. The New Spatiality. Journal of Architectural Education 40(2): 67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blesser, Barry. 2001. An interdisciplinary synthesis of reverberation viewpoints. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society 49(10): 867903.Google Scholar
Blesser, Barry. 2007. Spaces Speak, Are You Listening? Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Bornemann, Fritz. 1970. Auditorium of the German Pavilion at EXPO 70. Bauwelt 40: 1,494.Google Scholar
Brand, Stewart. 1999. The Clock of the Long Now. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Fox, Christopher. 2000. Stockhausen’s Plus Minus, More or Less: Written in Sand. Musical Times 141(1871): 1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannoukakis, Marinos, Zannos, Iannis. 2007. Self-Space: Interactive, Self Organized, Robotics Mediated, Cross-Media Platform for Music and Multimedia Performance. SMC 07, 4th Sound and Music Computing Conference. Lefkada, Greece: 359–66.Google Scholar
Stoianova, Ivanka, Kohl, Jerome. 1999. And Dasein Becomes Music: Some Glimpses of Light. Perspectives of New Music 37(1): 179212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Wesemael, Pieter. 2001. Architecture of Instruction and Delight: A Socio-historical Analysis of World Exhibitions as a Didactic Phenomenon (1798–1851–1970). Rotterdam: Uitgeverij 010 Publishers.Google Scholar
Worrall, D. 1998. Space in Sound: Sound in Space. Organised Sound 3: 9399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar