Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:02:50.287Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Avoiding Extinction in the Instrument Zoo: A taxonomical and ontological approach to developing an understanding of the ecosystem of electroacoustic instruments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Bill Vine
Bill Vine*
Affiliation:
School of Music, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK
*
E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the dangers of electroacoustic instruments being lost, from the orphaning of compositions to technological innovations in the field going unnoticed, and presents a case for developing a knowledge base as part of an effort to address these issues. Building in particular on the work of Davies and projects such as EARS, ARiADA and SARA, it explains how taxonomical (hierarchical classification systems) and ontological (more general and in-depth methods for formally collecting information on a domain) approaches should be deployed in this work and outlines some emerging ideas that should be considered when taxonomies and ontologies are developed.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 15 , Issue 2: Organising electroacoustic music , August 2010 , pp. 167 - 177
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ARiADA (Applied Research in the Aesthetics of Digital Arts) n.d. http://www.ariada.uea.ac.uk.Google Scholar
Battier, M. 2004. Electroacoustic Music Studies and the Danger of lOss. Organised Sound 9(1): 47–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongers, B. 2007. Electronic Musical Instruments: Experiences of a New Luthier. Leonardo Music Journal 17: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, H. 1992. New Musical Instruments in the Computer Age: Amplified Performance Systems and Related Examples of Low-level Technology. In Paynter, J. et al. (eds.) Companion to Contemporary Musical Thought: Volume 1. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Davies, H. 2001. The Preservation of Electronic Musical Instruments. Journal of New Music Research 30(4): 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EARS (ElectroAcoustic Resource Site) n.d. http://www.ears.dmu.ac.uk (accessed 4 January 2010).Google Scholar
EARS II (ElectroAcoustic Resource Site II) n.d. http://www.mti.dmu.ac.uk/~rjw/earsIIcall.html (accessed 4 January 2010).Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 2006. In what Form Can ‘Live Electronic Music’ Live on? Organised Sound 11(3): 209–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fields, K. 2007. Ontologies, Categories, Folksonomies: An Organised Language of Sound. Organised Sound 12(2): 101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilchrist, A. 2003. Thesauri, Taxonomies and Ontologies – An Etymological Note. Journal of Documentation 59(1): 7–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, A. D. 1987. A Review of Hierarchical Classification. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 150(2): 119–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, C. 1939. Avant-Garde and Kitsch. Partisan Review 6(5): 34–49.Google Scholar
Jordá, S. 2003. Interactive Music Systems for Everyone: Exploring Visual Feedback as a Way for Creating more Intuitive, Efficient and Learnable Instruments. Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Acoustics Conference, August 6–9, 2003 Stockholm: SMAC03.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1951. The Critique of Judgment, trans. with an introduction by J. H. Bernard. New York: Hafner Press.Google Scholar
Miller, D. 1997. An Interview with Dr Paul Tanner. http://www.electrotheremin.com/ptanner.html (accessed 28 September 2009).Google Scholar
Pearce, S. M. 1992. Museums, Objects and Collections: A Cultural Study. Leicester: Leicester University Press.Google Scholar
Peeters, G. 2003. Automatic Classification of Large Musical Instrument Databases Using Hierarchical Classifiers with Inertia Ratio Maximization. Proceedings of the 115th Audio Engineering Society Convention, 2003. AES E-Library: http://www.aes.org/e-lib (accessed 23 September 2009).Google Scholar
Rich, P. 1992. The Organizational Taxonomy: Definition and Design. The Academy of Management Review 17(4): 758–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SARA (Sonic Arts Research Archive) n.d. http://www.sara.uea.ac.uk.Google Scholar
Thorpe, S. J., Fabre-Thorpe, M. 2001. Seeking Categories in the Brain. Science New Series 291(5502): 260–263.Google ScholarPubMed
Uschold, M., Gruninger, S. 1996. Ontologies: Principles, Methods and Applications. Knowledge Engineering Review 11(2): 93–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, S. 2006. Making the Archive and Archiving the Making: Insights and Outcomes from a Major Research Project. Organised Sound 11(2): 143–147.Google Scholar