Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:04:15.148Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Multidimensional Approach to Relationships between Live and Non-live Sound Sources in Mixed Works

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Mike Frengel*
Affiliation:
Northeastern University, Department of Music, 351 Ryder Hall, Boston MA, 02115, USA

Abstract

Mixed works combining live performance with non-live sound sources projected over loudspeakers are commonplace in the field of electroacoustic music. A peculiarity of the mixed-work experience is that only some of the sound sources are seen, while many others may be heard. Consequently, a perceptual dissonance often arises between visual and aural stimuli, drawing particular attention to the relationship between the live and non-live components. Such a heightened perceptual focus on relations suggests the need for an analytical framework and terminology. This paper proposes a multidimensional framework of relations between live and non-live component pairs in mixed works, which can both serve as a model and foundation for analysis as well as provide composers with pathways of relations available under certain conditions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Bregman, A. 1994. Auditory Scene Analysis: The Perceptual Organization of Sound. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Davidovsky, M. 1972. Synchronisms No. 6 for Piano and Electronic Sounds. New York: Edward B. Marks Music Corporation, score 15590–21.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. 1986. The Relationship of Language to Materials. In S. Emmerson (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerson, S. 1998. Acoustic/Electroacoustic: The Relationship with Instruments. Journal of New Music Research 27(1–2): 146164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmerson, S. 2007. Living Electronic Music. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1986. Spectro-morphology and Structuring Processes. In S. Emmerson (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1996. The Listening Imagination: Listening in the Electroacoustic Era. Contemporary Music Review 13(2): 77107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, D. 2007. Space-form and the Acousmatic Image. Organised Sound 12(1): 3558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, T. 1994. Audible Design: A Plain and Easy Introduction to Practical Sound Composition. York: Orpheus the Pantomime.Google Scholar

DISCOGRAPHY

Boulez, P. 1999. Dialogue de l’Ombre Double (1985). On Pierre Boulez: Repons/Dialogue de l’Ombre Double (20/21 series). Alain Damiens, clarinet. Hamburg: Deutsche Grammophon, 45760.Google Scholar
Davidovsky, M. 2007. Synchronisms No. 6 (1972). On Aleck Karis: Secret Geometry. Aleck Karis, piano. New York: New World Records, NWCR707.Google Scholar
Frengel, M. 2009. Slinky (2004). On ICMC09: Selected Music. Mike Frengel, guitar. Montreal: International Computer Music Association.Google Scholar
Maderna, B. 1994. Musica su due Dimensioni (1952). On Bruno Maderna – Electronic Music. Renalto Rivolta, flute. Milan: Stradivarius, STR 33349.Google Scholar
Messiaen, O. 2003. Catalogue d’oiseaux (1958). On Olivier Messiaen: Catalogue d’oiseaux; La Fauvette des jardins. Anatol Ugorski, piano. Hamburg: Deutsche Grammophone, B0000942LN.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1992. Clarinet Threads (1985). On Impacts intérieurs. Roger Heaton, clarinet. Montreal: Empreintes Digitales, IMED-9209-CD.Google Scholar
Yuasa, J. 2007. Towards ‘The Midnight Sun’ (1984). On Aleck Karis: Secret Geometry. Aleck Karis, piano. New York: New World Records, NWCR707.Google Scholar