Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T02:21:43.002Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hacking the Medium: Shaping the creative constraints of network architectures in multiplicitous media artworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2021

Oliver Bown ,
Sam Ferguson ,
Augusto Dias Pereira Dos Santos  and
Kurt Mikolajczyk
Oliver Bown*
Affiliation:
Interactive Media Lab, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Sam Ferguson*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.
Augusto Dias Pereira Dos Santos*
Affiliation:
Interactive Media Lab, University of New South Wales, Australia.
Kurt Mikolajczyk*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering and IT, University of Technology Sydney, Australia.
*
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article we discuss our practice-based research into effective architectures and creative workflows for creatively coding massive multidevice light and sound installation artworks. We discuss the challenges of working with networked multidevice systems and illustrate these challenges with examples of the type of content that one may wish to display on these systems. We then consider how the structuring of a creative framework can strongly influence how an artist approaches the creation of such work, eases the process of creative search and discovery and reduces the time cost and risk of solving technical problems of architecture design. We take a design perspective on how to make effective creativity support tools and also consider a holistic perspective on creative practice that attempts to satisfy creative ideals grounded in the reality of practice.

Type
Article
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 26 , Issue 3: Collective and Networked Sound Practices , December 2021 , pp. 305 - 316
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bell, A. P. 2018. Dawn of the DAW: The Studio as Musical Instrument. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bin, S., Bui, C., Genchel, B., Sali, K., Magerko, B. and Freeman, J. 2019. From the Museum to the Browser: Translating a Music-Driven Exhibit from Physical Space to a Web App. Proceedings of the 2019 Web Audio Conference, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
Blackwell, A. and Green, T. 2003. Notational Systems – The Cognitive Dimensions of Notations Framework. In Carroll, J. M. (ed.) HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks: Toward an Interdisciplinary Science. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann, 103–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, O. and Ferguson, S. 2017. Creative Media+ the Internet of Things= Media Multiplicities. Leonardo 53–4.Google Scholar
Bown, O. and Ferguson, S. 2018. Understanding Media Multiplicities. Entertainment Computing 25: 62–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, O., Fraietta, A., Ferguson, S. and Tillman, D. 2020. Rapid Composition for a Multi-Device Networked Music Platform. Proceedings of the Sound and Music Conference, Torino, Italy.Google Scholar
Caldwell, G. A. and Foth, M. 2014. DIY Media Architecture: Open and Participatory Approaches to Community Engagement. Proceedings of the 2nd Media Architecture Biennale Conference, World Cities, Aarhus, Denmark. https://doi.org/10.1145/2682884.2682893 (accessed 24 October 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalsgaard, P. and Halskov, K. 2010. Designing Urban Media Facades: Cases and Challenges. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/1753326.1753670 (accessed 24 October 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, S., Rowe, A., Bown, O., Birtles, L. and Bennewith, C. 2017a. Networked Pixels: Strategies for Building Visual and Auditory Images with Distributed Independent Devices. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGCHI Conference on Creativity and Cognition, Singapore, 299–308.Google Scholar
Ferguson, S., Rowe, A., Bown, O., Birtles, L. and Bennewith, C. 2017b. Sound Design for a System of 1000 Distributed Independent Audio-Visual Devices. Proceedings of New Interfaces for Musical Expression 2017, Aalborg University Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
Haeusler, M. 2009. Media Facades: History, Technology, Content. Ludwigsburg, Germany: avedition.Google Scholar
Hall, E. T. 1966. The Hidden Dimension. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Hallam, J., Zheng, C., Posner, N., Ericson, H., Swarts, M. and Do, E. Y.-L. 2017. The Light Orchard: An Immersive Display Platform for Collaborative Tangible Interaction. Proceedings of the 2017 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing and the 2017 ACM International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Maui, Hawaii. https://doi.org/10.1145/3123024.3123175 (accessed 29 October 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hörtner, H., Gardiner, M., Haring, R., Lindinger, C. and Berger, F. 2012. Spaxels, Pixels in Space. Proceedings of the International Conference on Signal Processing and Multimedia Applications and Wireless Information Networks and Systems, Rome, Italy, 19–24.Google Scholar
Hu, J., Funk, M., Zhang, Y. and Wang, F. 2014. Designing Interactive Public Art Installations: New Material Therefore New Challenges. Proceedings of the International Conference on Entertainment Computing, Sydney, Australia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLuhan, M. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, D., Kalanithi, J. and Maes, P. 2007. Siftables: Towards Sensor Network User Interfaces. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, USA, 75–8.Google Scholar
Resnick, M., Myers, B., Nakakoji, K., Shneiderman, B., Pausch, R., Selker, T. and Eisenberg, M. 2005. Design Principles for Tools to Support Creative Thinking. Report from National Science Foundation Workshop on Creativity Support Tools, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Reynolds, C. W. 1987. Flocks, Herds and Schools: A Distributed Behavioural Model. Proceedings of the Computer Graphics SIGGRAPH ’87 Conference, Anaheim, California, USA, 25–34.Google Scholar
Rowe, A. 2012. Within an Ocean of Light: Creating Volumetric Lightscapes. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2012 Art Gallery, 358–65. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/2341931.2341937 (accessed 24 October 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shneiderman, B. 1983. Direct Manipulation: A Step Beyond Programming Languages., Computer 16 (8): 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shneiderman, B. 2010. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Delhi: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. 2003. Scientific Creativity as Constrained Stochastic Behavior: The Integration of Product, Person, and Process Perspectives. Psychological Bulletin 129 (4): 475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smallwood, S., Trueman, D., Cook, P. R. and Wang, G. 2008. Composing for Laptop Orchestra. Computer Music Journal 32 (1): 9–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, P. D. and Fisher, D. 2005. Selection, Constraints, and Creativity Case Studies: Max Beckmann and Philip Guston. Creativity Research Journal 17 (2–3): 283–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, P. D. and Gibbert, M. 2020. Using Paired Constraints to Solve the Innovation Problem. Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogtenhuber, R. 2019. Responsive Space–Liveness Through Spatial Distribution of Sound and Image. Proceedings of the 2019 Web Audio Conference, Trondheim, Norway.Google Scholar
Zigelbaum, J. and Coelho, M. 2011. Six-Forty by Four-Eighty: An Interactive Lighting Installation. Proceedings of the CHI ’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vancouver, BC, Canada. https://doi.org/10.1145/1979742.1979564 (accessed 29 October 2021).CrossRefGoogle Scholar