No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Developing a Phenomenological Approach to Music Notation
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 07 July 2015
Abstract
Sound art theorists Seth Kim-Cohen and Salomé Voegelin regard the fixed conceptual structures of notation either as an obstacle to pure sensorial engagement with sound (Voegelin 2010), or as the site of arrogant musical exceptionalism (Kim-Cohen 2009). While sound, whether constituted in phenomenological or idealist terms, is evolving and dynamic, notation is characterised by its ossifying imperative (Kim-Cohen 2009; Voegelin 2010). For Voegelin, a music score is regarded as conceptual, not perceptual. It is read as text and, it seems, has no meaningful place within a phenomenological practice of sound art (Voegelin 2010). The criticism that Vogelin’s phenomenalism, in particular, levels at notation invites close examination of notational practice and the semiotic structures that underwrite it. In this article, I seek to challenge the conceptual imperative of fixed notation through the presentation of a case study in the form of an original composition for string quartet and tape. Drawing on research by Rudolf Arnheim and Mark Johnson, a form of notation will be proposed that enables the score to escape singularly semiotic structures so that it may address the dynamic, phenomenological mode of experience that recent theories of sound art imply is beyond the reach of musical notation.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Organised Sound , Volume 20 , Special Issue 2: Sound Art and Music, Historical Continuum and Mimetic Fissures , August 2015 , pp. 160 - 170
- Copyright
- © Cambridge University Press 2015
References
Arnheim, R. 1974. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, D.
1992.
Improvisation: It’s Nature and Practice in Music
. New York: Da Capo.Google Scholar
Brown, E.
1970. Interview by Marceau C. Myers. Columbus: Capitol University. Courtesy of the Earle Brown Music Foundation.Google Scholar
Costello-Hirata, C. 1996. The Sounds of the Sounds Themselves: Analyzing the Early Music of Morton Feldman.
Perspectives of New Music (Winter). 6–27.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F.
2003. What is Philosophy? Translated by Burchell, G. and Tomlinson H. New York: Columbia University Press, (originally published in 1994).Google Scholar
Freeman, W. J. and Nunez, R. (eds.) 1999. Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention and Emotion. Bowling Green, OH: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. 1975. Interview with Derek Bailey. Transcribed by Henry Kuntz. http://bells.free-jazz.net/bells-part-two/derek-bailey-the-interview-london-1975/ (accessed 18 December 2014).Google Scholar
Kim-Cohen, S.
2009. In the Blink of an Ear: Toward a Non-Cochlear Sonic Art. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyman, M. 1999. Experimental Music: Cage and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandor, G. 1981. On Piano Playing: Motion, Sound and Expression. New York: Schirmer Books.Google Scholar
Voegelin, S. 2010. Listening to Noise and Silence: Towards a Philosophy of Sound Art. New York: Continuum Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casey supplementary material
Casey supplementary material 1
File
2 MB
Casey supplementary material
Casey supplementary material 2
File
2 MB
Casey supplementary material
Casey supplementary material 3
File
1.5 MB
Casey supplementary material
Casey supplementary material 4
File
1.7 MB