Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T01:10:47.441Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Employer Retaliation: The Myth and the Reality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

Extract

It is easier to identify an ethical dilemma than to solve it; this is the nature of the beast. In the process of deciding what to do, nurses are often pulled by conflicting demands from employers, patients, physicians, and other nurses: the feeling is that no resolution can be found which will satisfy everyone. A most difficult situation arises when the nurse feels an obligation to act in the best interests of patient care, but knows that to do so may be detrimental to her employer. When this happens, the nurse may fear that action to protect the patient will result in her being fired or some other form of retaliation by the employer. This fear is not entirely unfounded — employers do sometimes fire nurses who speak out against institutional policies. But a recent federal court case demonstrates that a hospital cannot summarily fire a nurse who acts responsibly in seeking to bring about institutional change.

Type
Ethical Dilemmas
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. 623 F.2d 808 (2d Cir. 1980).Google Scholar
2. National Labor Relations Act, § 7, as amended 29 U.S.C.A. § 157.Google Scholar
3. Eastex, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., 437 U.S. 556, 565(1978).Google Scholar
4. National Labor Relations Act § 2(3), as amended 29 U.S.C.A. § 152(3).Google Scholar
5. 623 F.2d 808, 816.Google Scholar
6. See Katz, B.F., Why Nurses Form Unions, NURSING LAW & ETHICS 1(2): 1 (February 1980).Google Scholar