Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:12:40.710Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Superconvergence and L∞-Error Estimates of the Lowest Order Mixed Methods for Distributed Optimal Control Problems Governed by Semilinear Elliptic Equations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

Tianliang Hou
Tianliang Hou*
Affiliation:
School of Mathematical Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, Guangdong, China
*
*Corresponding author.Email address:[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, we investigate the superconvergence property and the L∞-error estimates of mixed finite element methods for a semilinear elliptic control problem. The state and co-state are approximated by the lowest order Raviart-Thomas mixed finite element spaces and the control variable is approximated by piecewise constant functions. We derive some superconvergence results for the control variable. Moreover, we derive L∞-error estimates both for the control variable and the state variables. Finally, a numerical example is given to demonstrate the theoretical results.

Keywords

49J2065N30Semilinear elliptic equationsdistributed optimal control problemssuperconvergenceL∞-error estimatesmixed finite element methods
Type
Research Article
Information
Numerical Mathematics: Theory, Methods and Applications , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , August 2013 , pp. 479 - 498
Copyright
Copyright © Global Science Press Limited 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

[1] Arada, N., Casas, E. and Tröltzsch, F., Error estimates for the numerical approximation of a semilinear elliptic control problem, Comput. Optim. Appl., 23 (2002), pp. 201–229.Google Scholar
[2] Bonnans, J. F. and Casas, E., An extension of Pontryagin’s principle for state constrained optimal control of semilinear elliptic eqnation and variational inequalities, SIAM J. Control Optim., 33 (1995), pp. 274–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Brezzi, F. and Fortin, M., Mixed and hybrid finite element methods, Springer-Verlag., 95 (1991), pp. 65–187.Google Scholar
[4] Chen, Y., Superconvergence of mixed finite element methods for optimal control problems, Math. Comput., 77 (2008), pp. 1269–1291.Google Scholar
[5] Chen, Y., Superconvergence of quadratic optimal control problems by triangular mixed finite elements, Inter. J. Numer. Meths. Eng., 75 (8) (2008), pp. 881–898.Google Scholar
[6] Chen, Y. and Dai, Y, Superconvergence for optimal control problems governed by semi-linear elliptic equations, J. Sci. Comput., 39 (2009), pp. 206–221.Google Scholar
[7] Chen, Y. and Hou, T., Superconvergence and L∞-error estimates of RT1 mixed methods for semi-linear elliptic control problems with an integral constraint, Numer. Math. Theor. Meth. Appl., 5 (3) (2012), pp. 423–446.Google Scholar
[8] Chen, Y., Huang, Y, Liu, W. B. and Yan, N., Error estimates and superconvergence of mixed finite element methods for convex optimal control problems, J. Sci. Comput., 42 (3) (2009), pp. 382–403.Google Scholar
[9] Ciarlet, P. G., The Finite Element Method for Elliptic Problems, North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1978.Google Scholar
[10] Douglas, J. and Roberts, J. E., Global estimates for mixed finite element methods for second order elliptic equations, Math. Comput., 44 (1985), pp. 39–52.Google Scholar
[11] Gunzburger, M. D. and Hou, S. L., Finite dimensional approximation of a class of constrained nonlinear control problems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 34 (1996), pp. 1001–1043.Google Scholar
[12] Hou, L. and Turner, J. C., Analysis and finite element approximation of an optimal control problem in electrochemistry with current density controls, Numer. Math., 71 (1995), pp. 289–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Knowles, G., Finite element approximation of parabolic time optimal control problems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 20 (1982), pp. 414–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Li, R. and Liu, W. B., http://circus.math.pku.edu.cn/AFEPack.Google Scholar
[15] Li, R., Liu, W. B. and Yan, N., A posteriori error estimates of recovery type for distributed convex optimal control problems, J. Sci. Comput., 41 (5) (2002), pp. 1321–1349.Google Scholar
[16] Lions, J. L., Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17] Ladyzhenskaya, O. A. and Uraltseva, N., Linear and Quasilinear Elliptic Equations, Academic Press, New York, 1968.Google Scholar
[18] Lu, Z. and Chen, Y, L∞-error estimates of triangular mixed finite element methods for optimal control problems governed by semilinear elliptic equations, Numer. Anal. Appl., 12 (1) (2009), pp. 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[19] Meyer, C. and Rösch, A., Superconvergence properties of optimal control problems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 43 (3) (2004), pp. 970–985.Google Scholar
[20] Meyer, C. and Rösch, A., L∞-error estimates for approximated optimal control problems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 44 (2005), pp. 1636–1649.Google Scholar
[21] Meidner, D. and Vexler, B., A priori error estimates for space-time finite element discretization of parabolic optimal control problems part I: problems without control constraints, SIAM J. Control Optim., 47 (2008), pp. 1150–1177.Google Scholar
[22] Meidner, D. and Vexler, B., A priori error estimates for space-time finite element discretization of parabolic optimal control problems part II: problems with control constraints, SIAM J. Control Optim., 47 (2008), pp. 1301–1329.Google Scholar
[23] Mckinght, R. S. and Borsarge, J., The Rite-Galerkin procedure for parabolic control problems, SIAM J. Control Optim., 11 (1973), pp. 510–542.Google Scholar
[24] Raviart, P. A. and Thomas, J. M., A mixed finite element method for 2nd order elliptic problems, Aspecs of the Finite Element Method, Lecture Notes in Math, Springer, Berlin, 606 (1977), pp. 292–315.Google Scholar