Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-v2bm5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T23:51:42.335Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Technological Structure and Technical Change in the U.S. Northeast Farm Region

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Conrado M. Gempesaw II  and
James W. Dunn
Conrado M. Gempesaw II
Affiliation:
University of Delaware
James W. Dunn
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Extract

Considerable attention has been given to the proper measurement, estimation, and analysis of the technological structure of aggregate U.S. agriculture (Binswanger, Brown, Ray, and Antle). During the last decade, duality theory-motivated studies have also analyzed regional farm production (Saez, and Shumway). Except for the Saez study, no attempt has been made to analyze the farm production structure of the Northeast region.1

Type
Articles
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , October 1986 , pp. 137 - 144
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors appreciate the comments of S. E. Stefanou. Paper Number 7383 of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Antle, J. M. “The Structure of U.S. Agricultural Technology, 1910–78.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 66 (1984):414–421.Google Scholar
Barten, A. P. “Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Complete System of Demand Equations.” European Economic Review. 1 (1969):7–73.Google Scholar
Binswanger, H. P. “A Cost Function Approach to the Measurement of Factor Demand and Elasticities of Substitution.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 56 (1974):377–386.Google Scholar
Brown, R. S. “Productivity, Returns and the Structure of Production in the U.S. Agriculture, 1947–1974.” . University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1978.Google Scholar
Gempesaw, Conrado M. II. “An Intersectoral, Interregional Market Equilibrium Sensitivity Analysis of the U.S. Food Industry.” , Pennsylvania State University, 1985.Google Scholar
Kmenta, J. Elements of Econometrics. New York: MacMillan, 1971.Google Scholar
Lau, L. J. “Profit Functions of Technologies with Multiple Inputs and Outputs.” Review of Economic Statistics. 54 (1972):281–289.Google Scholar
Lau, L. J. “A Characterization of the Normalized Restricted Profit Function.” Journal of Economic Theory. 12 (1976):131–163.Google Scholar
McFadden, D. “Cost, Revenue, and Profit Functions.” In Fuss, M. and McFadden, D. (eds.) Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications. Vol. 1, North Holland, 1978.Google Scholar
Ray, S. C. “A Translog Cost Function Analysis of U.S. Agriculture, 1939–1977.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 64 (1982):490–498,Google Scholar
Saez, R. R. “Multiproduct Agricultural Supply Response and Factor Demand Estimation in the U.S.: The Profit Function Approach.” . Texas A&M University, 1983.Google Scholar
Shumway, C. R. “Supply, Demand, and Technology in a Multiproduct Industry: Texas Field Crops.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics. 65 (1983):748–760.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. Various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: State Income and Balance Sheet Statistics. Various issues.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Indicators of the Farm Sector: Production and Efficiency Statistics. Various issues.Google Scholar
Weaver, R. D. and Lass, D. A. “Comer Solutions in Duality Models: A Cross Section Analysis of Dairy Production Decisions.” Staff Paper No. 52. Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, 1983.Google Scholar