Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T10:54:43.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Investment Potential of Warm-Season Grasses for Hill-Land Beef Producers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Gerard E. D’Souza ,
Rafael F. Romero  and
Dennis K. Smith
Gerard E. D’Souza
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, West Virginia University
Rafael F. Romero
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, West Virginia University
Dennis K. Smith
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, West Virginia University
Get access

Abstract

The investment potential of warm-season grasses is compared with that of cool-season grasses, with special emphasis on hill-land beef production. In addition to evaluating relative costs and returns for various grazing systems, a sensitivity analysis is conducted. The results are then illustrated for a representative hill-land farm in West Virginia, and both an optimal and a set of quasi-optimal solutions are generated within the linear programming framework. In general, warm-season grasses are found to be a superior investment alternative for hill-land beef producers.

Type
Articles
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , April 1988 , pp. 56 - 63
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Published with the approval of the Director of the West Virginia Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station as Scientific Article #2091. This research was supported with funds appropriated under the Hatch/McIntire-Stennis, etc. Act.

References

Brill, E. D. Jr., Chang, S. Y., and Hopkins, L. D. “Modeling to Generate Alternatives: the HSJ Approach and an Illustration Using a Problem in Land Use Planning.” Management Science 28 (1982):221–235.Google Scholar
Casler, G. L., Anderson, B. L., and Aplin, R. D. Capital Investment Analysis Using Discounted Cash Flows. Columbus, OH: Grid, 1984.Google Scholar
Gidley, J. S. and Bari, M. F. “Modeling to Generate Alternatives: A Review”. Water Forum 1986, Long Beach, CA, August 1986.Google Scholar
Kruger, C. R. and Curtis, D. C. “Evaluation of Big Bluestem, Indiangrass, Sideoats Gamma, and Switchgrass Pastures with Yearling Steers.” Agronomy Journal 71 (1979):480–482.Google Scholar
Paris, Q. “Multiple Optimal Solutions in Linear Programming Models.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 63 (1981):724–727.Google Scholar
Reid, R. L. and Jung, G. A. Sward Utilization in Warm Season-Cool Season Grass Grazing Systems in the Northeast United States. Report by West Virginia University and the U.S. Regional Pasture Research Laboratory, USDA-SEA, 1984.Google Scholar
Romero, R. F. “An Evaluation of the Economic Potential of Using Warm-Season Grasses for Livestock Feeding in West Virginia Utilizing the Linear Programming Quasi-Optimal Solution Technique.” , West Virginia University, 1986.Google Scholar
Rubin, D. S. “Algorithmic Issues for Multiple Optima and Near-Optima.” Presented paper, American Association for the Advancement of Science, New York, NY, May 1984.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service. Agricultural Prices. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1982-86.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Statistical Reporting Service. Agricultural Statistics. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1982-86.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1982 Census of Agriculture. West Virginia State and County Data. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1984.Google Scholar
West Virginia Department of Agriculture, WV Crop Reporting Service. West Virginia Agricultural Statistics. Charleston, WV, 1982–86.Google Scholar