No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Gender's Role in Manuscript Acceptance: Sex in the Journal
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2017
Abstract
Women authors fare poorly at the hands of referees in some economics journals, especially when the review process is not blind. Using data on the 155 manuscripts submitted to the NJARE for publication during the period 1984–88, we found no evidence of differential referee acceptance rates for manuscripts with female and male lead authors.
Thus it is quite possible that the name “Miss” transmits through the board or division some vibration which is not registered in the examination room.
Virginia Woolf
Three Guineas
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , April 1989 , pp. 58 - 62
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1989 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association
Footnotes
The capable assistance of James Scanlon in data entry and the editorial suggestions of Julie Caswell, Dan Lass and two anonymous reviewers are acknowledged with appreciation. We are especially indebted to the current editor, James Dunn, for supplying the data for manuscripts submitted for the 1987–88 issues. The usual disclaimer applies.
References
Ashenfelter, Orley, and Oaxaca, Ronald, “The Economics of Discrimination: Economists Enter the Courtroom,” American Economic Review, 77 (1987): 321–325.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary, The Economics of Discrimination. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1957).Google Scholar
Beilock, Richard and Polopolus, Leo, “Ranking of Agricultural Economics Departments: Influence of Regional Journals, Joint Authorship, and Self-Citations,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 70 (1988): 403–409.Google Scholar
Blau, Francine D., and Ferber, Marianne A., “Discrimination: Empirical Evidence from the United States,” American Economic Review, 77 (1987): 316–320.Google Scholar
Broder, Josef and Ziemer, Rod, “Determinants of Agricultural Economics Faculty Salaries,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64 (1982): 301–303.Google Scholar
Ferber, Marianne and Teiman, Michele, “Are Women at a Disadvantage in Publishing Journal Articles?,” Eastern Economic Journal, 9 (1980): 189–194.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia, and Polachek, Solomon, “Residual Differences by Sex: Perspectives on the Gender Gap in Earnings,” American Economic Review, 77 (1987): 143–151.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Peter, “Sex Discrimination in Labor Markets: The Role of Statistical Evidence,” American Economic Review, 77 (1987): 567–583.Google Scholar
Lee, Linda K., “A Comparison of the Rank and Salary of Male and Female Agricultural Economists,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, (1981): 1013–1018.Google Scholar
Lee, Linda K., “The Professional Agricultural Economics Labor Market: Discussion,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, (1982): 1065–1067.Google Scholar
Lee, Linda K., and Offutt, Susan E., “Women in Agricultural Economics: Rank and Advancement Revisited,” Unpublished paper. July 1986. USDA and University of Illinois. 15 pages.Google Scholar
Madden, Janice Fanning, “Gender Differences in the Cost of Displacement: An Empirical Test of Discrimination in the Labor Market,” American Economic Review, 77 (1987): 246–251.Google Scholar
Oaxaca, Ronald, “Male-Female Wage Differentials In Urban Labor Markets,” International Economics Review, 14 (1973): 693–709.Google Scholar
Redman, Barbara J., “The Women Who Become Agricultural Economists,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, (1981): 1019–1024.Google Scholar
Sawhill, Isabel V., “Report of the Committee on the Status of Women in the Economics Profession,” American Economic Review, 77 (1987): 401–403.Google Scholar