Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:08:54.056Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Farm-Level Analysis of Soil Loss Control: Modeling the Probabilistic Nature of Annual Soil Loss

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

William T. McSweeny
William T. McSweeny*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology at Penn State
Get access

Abstract

The Conservation Compliance provision of the Food Security Act of 1985 requires all farmers who farmed highly erodible land prior to the passage of the Act to have a locally approved conservation plan fully implemented by 1995 or lose eligibility for numerous farm programs. Soil loss estimates of various crop, tillage practices, and conservation practices, however, are stochastic in nature. A farm planning model is suggested that allows for stochastic soil loss estimates. The model is compared to other models used in farm level soil conservation studies. The model shows promise as a more acceptable tool in that the farm plans are more likely to be acceptable to the farmer.

Type
Articles
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 2 , October 1988 , pp. 125 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The author wishes to express his thanks to two anonymous reviewers whose comments were helpful in shaping this manuscript.

Authorized for publication as paper number 7711 in the journal series of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Chames, A. and Cooper, W. W. “Chance Constrained Programming.” Management Science (6(1959):73–79.Google Scholar
McSweeny, William T. and Kramer, R. A. “The Integration of Farm Programs for Achieving Soil Conservation and Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Objectives.” Land Economics 62 (1986):159–173.Google Scholar
Murtagh, Bruce A. and Saunders, Micheal A. MINOS 5.0 User's Guide. Technical Report SOL 83-20, Systems Optimization Laboratory, Department of Operations Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California, December 1983.Google Scholar
Paris, Quirino and Easter, C. D. “A Programming Model with Stochastic Technology and Prices: The Case of Australian Agriculture.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67 (1985):120–129.Google Scholar
Robinson, S. M. “A Quadratically Convergent Algorithm for General Nonlinear Programming Problems.” Mathematical Programming 3 (1972):145–56.Google Scholar
Segarra, Eduardo, Kramer, R. A., and Taylor, D. B. “A Stochastic Programming Analysis of the Farm Level Implications of Soil Erosion Control.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics. 17 (1985):147–154.Google Scholar
Stavros, Robert W. The Development of an Evaluation Method for Best Management Practices on Agricultural Land. Unpublished , Department of Engineering Sciences and Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Virginia, November, 1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Soil Survey of City of Suffolk, Virginia. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, D.C., June 1981.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1982 Census of Agriculture Preliminary Report, City of Suffolk, VA., U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., December 1983.Google Scholar