Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:10:17.365Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Attitudes and Household Characteristics Influencing Solid Waste Generation: A Household Garbage Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Donald J. Epp  and
Paul C. Mauger
Donald J. Epp
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Paul C. Mauger
Affiliation:
The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
Get access

Abstract

A survey of household decision-makers and an analysis of their garbage was used to suggest factors affecting the weight of household contributions to municipal solid waste. Iterative regression was used to build a model from the data that is hypothesized to explain garbage weight. Food expenditure, environmental attitude, consumption of soft drinks in plastic bottles, and cats in the household were significant for all households. Self-sufficiency and energy-conscious behavioral scales also affected the subgroup with female householders having an educational level of high school graduation or less.

Type
Research Article
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , April 1989 , pp. 46 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © 1989 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

We gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments of C. A. Hamlett, J. S. Shortle and two anonymous journal referees. Paper No. 8123 in the Journal Series of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Brooks, Thomas M. “Consumers' Preferences for Selected Types of Food Packaging.” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University. 1961.Google Scholar
Connor, John, Heien, Dale, Kinsey, Jean and Wills, Robert. “Economic Forces Shaping the Food Processing Industry.” Paper presented at the American Agricultural Economics Association meetings, Ames, IA. 1985.Google Scholar
Efaw, Fritz and Lanen, William N. Impact of User Charges on Management of Household Solid Waste. Prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 600/579-008. 1979.Google Scholar
Epp, Donald J. and Mauger, Paul C. Determinants of Household Solid Waste Generation: A Household Garbage Analysis. Staff Paper #153, Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology Department, The Pennsylvania State University, 1988.Google Scholar
Freund, R. J. and Debertin, D. L. “Variable Selection and Statistical Significance: A Sampling Experiment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (1975): 721–722.Google Scholar
Harrison, Gail G. “Sociocultural Correlates of Food Utilization and Waste in a Sample of Urban Households.” Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Arizona, 1976.Google Scholar
Mauger, Paul C. “Determinants of Household Food Packaging Choices and Solid Waste Generation: A Household Garbage Analysis.” M.S. thesis, The Pennsylvania State University, 1987.Google Scholar
Phillips, David A. Jr., Restrepo, Ivan and Rathje, William L. “El Proyecto Basura: The Archaeology of Industrial Transformation in Mexico.” American Behavioral Scientist 28 (1984): 139–153.Google Scholar