No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Quality Changes and Limited Marketing Season Effects on the Demand for Fresh Blueberries
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 May 2017
Abstract
This study examines the notion that fresh-fruit prices follow a time trend separate from the effect of seasonal supply changes over the marketing season. In particular, quality changes and a limited marketing season are hypothesized to contribute to the seasonal changes in demand. The empirical results support these hypotheses for the Boston fresh-blueberry market.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , October 1991 , pp. 174 - 180
- Copyright
- Copyright © 1991 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association
Footnotes
This research was funded by a cooperative agreement, no. 58-3J31-7-0047, between the U.S. Department of Agriculture/ Agricultural Cooperative Service and the University of Maine, and by the Maine Agricultural Experiment Station. The authors wish to thank Wally Thurman and Hartwig Schaefer for the original inspiration for the study; Greg Adams and Jim Leiby, respectively, for various other forms of inspiration; Jim Calnan and Donna Lupo from the Boston/USDA Market News Service for help with the data; two anonymous reviewers for very constructive suggestions; and Tim Woods and Florence Bubar for technical help. MAES Publication no. 1585.
References
Cropper, M. L., Deck, L. B., and McConnell, K. E. “On the Choice of Functional Form for Hedonic Price Functions.” Review of Economics and Statistics 70 (1988):668–75.Google Scholar
Goodwin, H. L. Jr., Fuller, S. W., Capps, O. Jr., and Asgill, O. W. “Factors Affecting Fresh Potato Price in Selected Terminal Markets.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 13 (1988):233–43.Google Scholar
Ismail, A., and Kender, W. J. “Physical and Chemical Changes Associated with the Development of the Lowbush Blueberry Fruit Vaccinium angustifolium Ait.” MAES Bulletin no. 70. May 1974.Google Scholar
Jordan, J. J., Shewfelt, R. L., Prussia, S. E., and Hurst, W. C. “Estimating Implicit Marginal Prices of Quality Characteristics of Tomatoes.” Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics 17 (1985):139–46.Google Scholar
Ladd, G. W., and Martin, M. B. “Prices and Demands for Input Characteristics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58 (1976):21–30.Google Scholar
Lancaster, K. “A New Approach to Consumer Theory.” Journal of Political Economy 74 (1966):132–57.Google Scholar
Leffler, K. B. “Ambiguous Changes in Product Quality.” American Economic Review 72 (1982):956–67.Google Scholar
Palmquist, R. B. “Estimating the Demand for the Characteristics of Housing.” Review of Economics and Statistics 66 (1984):394–404.Google Scholar
Parker, D. D., and Zilberman, D. “Price Transmission Across Marketing Levels in a Hedonic Framework.” University of California Giannini Foundation Working Paper no. 515. October 1989.Google Scholar
Rosen, S. “Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 82 (1974):34–55.Google Scholar
Thurman, W. “Quality and Demand: An Empirical Application to Apples.” North Carolina State University, Department of Economics and Business, 1987.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. U.S. Govt. Printing Office, various years.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Market News Service. “Boston Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Wholesale Market Prices and Arrivals.” 1979–88.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Bureau of Economic Analysis. “Local Area Personal Income.” 1979–88.Google Scholar
Waugh, F. V. Quality as a Determinant of Vegetable Prices. New York: Columbia University Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Woods, T. A., Marra, M. C., and Leiby, J. D. “Important Determinants of a Marketing Strategy for Wild Blueberries.” Journal of Food Distribution Research (Spring 1990).Google Scholar