Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Gripp, Sharon I.
Luloff, A.E.
and
Yonkers, Robert D.
1994.
Reporting Response Rates for Telephone Surveys Used In Agricultural Economics Research.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 2,
p.
200.
Bowker, J.M.
and
Didychuk, D.D.
1994.
Estimation of the Nonmarket Benefits of Agricultural Land Retention in Eastern Canada.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 2,
p.
218.
Laughland, Andrew S.
Musser, Wesley N.
and
Musser, Lynn M.
1994.
An Experiment in Contingent Valuation and Social Desirability.
Agricultural and Resource Economics Review,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 1,
p.
29.
Gilbert, Laura A.
and
Halstead, John M.
1997.
Economic considerations in the endangered species debate: The case of the piping plover.
Human Dimensions of Wildlife,
Vol. 2,
Issue. 3,
p.
1.
Fujiwara, Akimasa
and
Sugie, Yoriyasu
2000.
Evaluation of Light Rail Transit Based on Contingent Valuation Method.
Journal of the City Planning Institute of Japan,
Vol. 35,
Issue. 0,
p.
577.
Jorgensen, Bradley S
and
Syme, Geoffrey J
2000.
Protest responses and willingness to pay: attitude toward paying for stormwater pollution abatement.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 2,
p.
251.
Belluzzo, Walter
2000.
Contingent Valuation For Projects Of Water Resources Improvements.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Nunes, Paulo A.L.D
and
van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M
2001.
Economic valuation of biodiversity: sense or nonsense?.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 2,
p.
203.
Strazzera, Elisabetta
Genius, Margarita
Scarpa, Riccardo
and
Hutchinson, W. George
2001.
The Effect of Protest Votes on the Estimates of Willingness to Pay for Use Values of Recreational Sites.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Jorgensen, Bradley S
Wilson, Mathew A
and
Heberlein, Thomas A
2001.
Fairness in the contingent valuation of environmental public goods: attitude toward paying for environmental improvements at two levels of scope.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
133.
Loomis, John B.
Bair, Lucas S.
and
González‐Cabán, Armando
2002.
Language‐Related Differences in a Contingent Valuation Study: English Versus Spanish.
American Journal of Agricultural Economics,
Vol. 84,
Issue. 4,
p.
1091.
Loomis, John
Gonzalez‐Caban, Armando
and
Hesseln, Hayley
2004.
Multicultural Evaluation of the Performance of Contingent Valuation for Forest Fire Prevention.
Contemporary Economic Policy,
Vol. 22,
Issue. 3,
p.
407.
Loomis, John
Smith, Adam
and
Huszar, Paul
2005.
Estimating the economic benefits of maintaining residential lake levels at an irrigation reservoir: A contingent valuation study.
Water Resources Research,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 8,
Cho, Seong-Hoon
Newman, David H.
and
Bowker, J.M.
2005.
Measuring rural homeowners' willingness to pay for land conservation easements.
Forest Policy and Economics,
Vol. 7,
Issue. 5,
p.
757.
Loomis, John
Miller, Julie
Gonzalez-Caban, Armando
and
Champ, Joseph
2006.
Testing the Convergent Validity of Videotape Survey Administration and Phone Interviews in Contingent Valuation.
Society & Natural Resources,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 4,
p.
367.
Aizaki, Hideo
Sato, Kazuo
and
Osari, Hiroshi
2006.
Contingent valuation approach in measuring the multifunctionality of agriculture and rural areas in Japan.
Paddy and Water Environment,
Vol. 4,
Issue. 4,
p.
217.
Meyerhoff, Jürgen
and
Liebe, Ulf
2006.
Protest beliefs in contingent valuation: Explaining their motivation.
Ecological Economics,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 4,
p.
583.
Loomis, John
Ellingson, Lindsey
Gonzalez‐Caban, Armando
and
Seidl, Andy
2006.
The Role of Ethnicity and Language in Contingent Valuation Analysis.
The American Journal of Economics and Sociology,
Vol. 65,
Issue. 3,
p.
559.
Kallas, Zein
Gómez‐Limón, José A.
and
Hurlé, Jesús Barreiro
2007.
Decomposing the Value of Agricultural Multifunctionality: Combining Contingent Valuation and the Analytical Hierarchy Process.
Journal of Agricultural Economics,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
218.
Dziegielewska, Dominika A.
and
Mendelsohn, Robert
2007.
Does “No” mean “No”? A protest methodology.
Environmental and Resource Economics,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
71.