Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:13:29.752Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Thomas Hoffmann & Graeme Trousdale (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. xvii + 586.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

Benjamin Lyngfelt
Benjamin Lyngfelt*
Affiliation:
Department of Swedish, University of Gothenburg, Box 200, SE 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , December 2013 , pp. 381 - 387
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boas, Hans & Sag, Ivan A. (eds.). 2012. Sign-Based Construction Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J. & Kay, Paul. 1993. Construction Grammar coursebook. Ms., Department of Linguistics, University of California at Berkeley.Google Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Kay, Paul & O'Connor, Mary Catherine. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: The case of let alone. Language 64, 501–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles J., Lee-Goldman, Russell & Rhomieux, Russel. 2012. The FrameNet constructicon. In Boas & Sag (eds.), 309–372.Google Scholar
Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola. 2004. Construction Grammar: A thumbnail sketch. In Fried, Mirjam & Östman, Jan-Ola (eds.), Construction Grammar in a Cross-language Perspective, 11–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hilpert, Martin. To appear. Construction Grammar and its Application to English. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Höder, Steffen. To appear. Phonological elements in Diasystematic Construction Grammar. Constructions and Frames.Google Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan & Sag, Ivan A.. 2000. Interrogative Investigations: The Form, Meaning, and Use of English Interrogatives. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Adele E. 2006. Constructions at Work: The Nature of Generalization in Language. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kay, Paul & Fillmore, Charles J.. 1999. Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: The What's X doing Y? construction. Language 75, 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive Grammar: A Basic Introduction. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollard, Carl & Sag, Ivan A.. 1994. Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago, IL & London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steels, Luc. 2010. Design Patterns in Fluid Construction Grammar (Constructional Approaches to Language 11). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar