Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-b95js Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-08T10:20:54.503Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Svenska nominalfraser och kontext-fri grammatik

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Robin Cooper
Robin Cooper
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wis. 53706, USA.
Get access

Abstract

Swedish noun-phrases of the form (Det) (Adj)* N are examined in the light of recent work in generalized phrase-structure grammar. It is argued that simple generalizations about the phrase-structure of these NPs are lost by trying to account for the precise morphological possibilities by using phrase-structure rules mentioning categories marked with morphological features. What could be accounted for by two rules must be broken down into subcases which need seven rules, thereby obscuring the overall syntactic structure of the NPs. An alternative is suggested which maintains the simple syntax which generates morphologically ill-formed NPs but only allows morphologically well-formed ones to be interpreted. It is suggested that this system can be constrained so as to generate only context-free languages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 7 , Issue 2 , December 1984 , pp. 115 - 143
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAFI

Anward, J. & Linell, P. 1976. Om lexikaliserade fraser i svenska. Nysvenska studier 55–56, 77–119.Google Scholar
Barwise, J. & Cooper, R. 1981. Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language. Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckman, N. 1961 (1964). Svensk språklära för den högre elementärundervisningen (nionde upplagan). Svenska Bokförlaget Bonniers.Google Scholar
Carlson, G. 1977. A Unified Analysis of the English Bare Plural. Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 413–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cooper, R. 1982. Wholewheat* Syntax (*unenriched with inaudibilia), The Nature of Syntactic Representation, ed. by Jacobson, P. and Pullum, G.. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Gazdar, G. 1982. Phrase Structure Grammar, The Nature of Syntactic Representation, ed. by Jacobson, P. and Pullum, G.. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hellan, L. 1977. X-Syntax, Categorial Syntax and Logical Form, Papers from the Trondheim Syntax Symposium 1977, ed. by T. Fretheim and L. Hellan.Google Scholar
Hellan, L. 1980. Toward an integrated theory of noun phrases: the development of a grammatical model adequate for the description of the syntax and semantics of noun phrases in English and Norwegian, Avhandling, Universitetet i Trondheim.Google Scholar
Källström, R. 1977. Agreement Rules for Swedish Noun Phrases, Logic, Pragmatics and Grammar, ed. by Dahl, Östen, Department of Linguistics, University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
Klein, E. & Sag, I., under utgivning. Type-Driven Translation. Linguistics and Philosophy Vol. 8, No. 2.Google Scholar
Teleman, U. 1969. Definita och indefinita attribut i nusvenskan, Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap, serie B nr 7, Studentlitteratur, Lund.Google Scholar