Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:19:30.238Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stød in unexpected morphological contexts in Standard Danish: An experimental approach to sound change in progress

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 2020

Nina Grønnum ,
Nicolai Pharao Open the ORCID record for Nicolai Pharao [Opens in a new window]  and
Hans Basbøll
Nina Grønnum
Affiliation:
Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 136 & Emil Holms Kanal 2, DK–2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
Nicolai Pharao
Affiliation:
Department of Nordic Studies and Linguistics, University of Copenhagen, Njalsgade 136 & Emil Holms Kanal 2, DK–2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark
Hans Basbøll
Affiliation:
Department of Language and Communication, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, 5230 Odense M, Denmark
Get access

Abstract

In recent years stød has appeared in words where the current phonological and morphological principles of its distribution would exclude it. Thus, a disyllable like [ˈsiːðə] side ‘page’ is without stød, also in a compound like bagside ‘back page’, but it has lately been heard with stød: . In a controlled experiment, speakers were required to produce compounds consisting of an existing initial word succeeded by a final nonce noun. The results indicate that stød may be spreading in this context. Furthermore, its distribution across the 40 nonce nouns was found to be similar to its distribution among existing nouns in the vocabulary: There are more nonce nouns with stød (i) in the definite singular, (ii) especially with short stressed vowels, and (iii) particularly if the initial word is monosyllabic. A change is apparently underway which will eventually partially suspend a non-stød principle which relieves disyllabic lexemes of stød.

Keywords

Danishexperimental phonologymorphologynon-stød principleproductivityprosodysound changestødword structure
Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 43 , Issue 2 , October 2020 , pp. 147 - 180
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baayen, R. H[arald]. 2008. Analyzing Linguistic Data: A Practical Introduction to Statistics Using R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basbøll, Hans. 2003. Prosody, productivity and word structure: The stød pattern of Modern Danish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26(1), 5–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basbøll, Hans. 2005. The Phonology of Danish. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Basbøll, Hans. 2008. Stød, diachrony and the Non-Stød Model. North-Western European Language Evolution (NOWELE) 54/55, 147–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basbøll, Hans. 2012. Monosyllables and prosody: The Sonority Syllable meets the word. In Thomas, Stolz, Nicole, Nau & Cornelia, Stroh (eds.), Monosyllables: From Phonology to Typology, 13–41. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.Google Scholar
Basbøll, Hans. 2014. Danish stød as evidence for grammaticalization of suffixal positions in word structure. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 46(2), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Basbøll, Hans. 2018. Danish imperative formation: A problem for the phonology/morphology interface. Scandinavian Philology 16(2), 219–243.Google Scholar
Basbøll, Hans, Kjærbæk, Laila & Lambertsen, Claus. 2011. The Danish noun plural landscape. Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 43(2), 81–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brink, Lars & Lund, Jørn. 1975. Dansk Rigsmål. Lydudviklingen siden 1840 med særligt henblik på sociolekterne i København [Danish standard language: sound development since 1840 with special regard to the sociolects in Copenhagen]. København: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Bruce, Gösta. 1974. Tonaccentregler för sammansatta ord i några sydsvenska stadsmål [Tonal accent rules for compound words in some southern Swedish town vernaculars]. In Christer, Platzack (ed.), Svenskans Beskrivning 8, 62–75. Lund: Institutionen för Nordiska Språk, Lunds Universitet.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli. 1987. A phonetic study of the stød in Standard Danish. Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics; University of Copenhagen 21, 55–265.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli. 1989a. Phonetic Analysis of the Stød in Danish. Turku: University of Turku.Google ScholarPubMed
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli. 1989b. Phonetic analysis of the stød in Standard Danish. Phonetica 46(1), 1–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregersen, Frans, Maegaard, Marie & Pharao, Nicolai. 2014. The LANCHART Corpus. In Jacques, Durand, Ulrike, Gut & Gjert, Kristoffersen (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Corpus Phonology, 534–545. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grønnum, Nina. 2009. A Danish phonetically annotated spontaneous speech corpus (DanPASS). Speech Communication 51, 594–603. [The corpus can be accessed at https://danpass.hum.ku.dk.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grønnum, Nina. 2015. F0, voice quality, and Danish stød revisited. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVIII), paper number 0423.1–5. Glasgow: The University of Glasgow. [https://www.internationalphoneticassociation.org/icphsproceedings/ICPhS2015/Papers/ICPHS0423.pdf]Google Scholar
Grønnum, Nina & Basbøll, Hans. 2001. Consonant length, stød and morae in Standard Danish. Phonetica 58(4), 230–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grønnum, Nina & Basbøll, Hans. 2007. Danish Stød: Phonological and cognitive issues. In Maria-Josep, Solé, Patricia Speeter, Beddor & Manjari, Ohala (eds.), Experimental Approaches to Phonology, 192–206. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grønnum, Nina & Basbøll, Hans. 2012. Danish Stød – towards simpler structural principles? In Oliver, Niebuhr (ed.), Understanding Prosody: The Role of Context, Function, and Communication, 27–46. Berlin & Boston, MA: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hansen, Aage. 1943. Stødet i dansk [The stød in Danish] (Det Kgl. Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Historisk-filol. Meddelelser XXIX, No.5). København: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Hansen, Gert Foget. 2015. Stød og stemmekvalitet – en akustisk-fonetisk undersøgelse af ændringer i stemmekvaliteten i forbindelse med stød [Stød and voice quality: An acoustic-phonetic investigation of changes in voice quality in connection with stød]. Ph.D. dissertation. Københavns Universitet, Det Humanistiske Fakultet.Google Scholar
Kristoffersen, Gjert. 1992. Tonelag i sammensatte ord i østnorsk [Tonal accents in compound words in Eastern Norwegian]. Norsk Lingvistisk Tidsskrift 10, 39–65.Google Scholar
Madsen, Thomas O., Basbøll, Hans & Lambertsen, Claus. 2002. Olam – et semiautomatisk morfologisk og lydstrukturelt kodningssystem for dansk [Olam: A semi-automatic morphological and sound structure coding system for Danish]. Odense Working Papers in Language and Communication 24, 43–56.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1937. La Phonologie du Mot en Danois. Paris: Libraire C. Klincksieck. (Also in Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 38, 169–266.)Google Scholar
Molbæk Hansen, Peter. 1990. Dansk Udtale [Danish pronunciation]. København: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
Mortensen, Johannes Lausten. 2013–2014. Perception af Stød. Project for the MA degree in Linguistics, winter 2013–2014, University of Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Jaeger, Jeri J.. 1986. Why experiments? In Ohala, John J. & Jaeger, Jeri J. (eds.), Experimental Phonology, 1–6. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Therneau, Terry, Atkinson, Beth & Ripley, Brian. 2018. Package ‘rpart’ (statistical software).Google Scholar