Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:58:56.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Repair in Second-Language Instruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Päivi Juvonen
Päivi Juvonen
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, S-10691Stockholm, Sweden.
Get access

Abstract

The present paper deals with the study of repair patterns. Repair, seen as some type of intrinsic trouble manifested by some party during interaction, has here been studied in an institutional setting, the second-language class-room. The repair sequences have been studied relative to the activity type in which the participants are involved. The results show the following: first, that the activity type has an impact on the repair pattern; and secondly, both quantitative and qualitative differences in repair patterns are found when compared with non-educational and foreign-language-teaching settings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , December 1989 , pp. 183 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anward, J. 1983. Språkbruk och språkutveckling i skolan. Lund: LiberFürlag.Google Scholar
Grogarn, M. 1988. Knagglig läsning (SIC 24). Linköping: University of Linköping.Google Scholar
Gustavsson, L. 1988. Language Taught and Language Used. Linköping Studies in Arts and Science, 18. Linköping.Google Scholar
Jefferson, G. 1987. On Exposed and Embedded Correction in Conversation. In Button, G. & Lee, J. R. E. (eds.) Talk and Social Organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters, pp. 86–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juvonen, P. 1988. Den språkliga interaktionen under en språklektion. Arbetsrapport från Tema K 1988:3. University of Linkoping: Department of Communication Studies.Google Scholar
Kasper, G. 1985. Repair in Foreign Language Teaching. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 7, 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M. 1983. Monitoring and Self-repair in Speech. Cognition 14, 41–104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linell, P. & Gustavsson, L. 1987. Initiativ och respons. Om dialogens dynamik, dominans och koherens. Studies in Communication 15. University of Linköping: Department of Communication Studies.Google Scholar
Linell, P., Gustavsson, L. & Juvonen, P. 1988. Interactional Dominance in Dyadic Communication: A Presentation of Initiative-Response Analysis. Linguistics 26, 415–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McHoul, A. 1978. The Organization of Turns at Formal Talk in the Classroom. Language in Society 7, 183–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazeland, H. 1986. Some Aspects of the Organization of Repair in Lessons. Paper presented at the International Conference on “Discourse in Institutions”. University of Amsterdam: Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A. & Jefferson, G. 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation. Language 50, 696–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G. & Sacks, H. 1977. The preference for self- correction in the organization or repair in conversation. Language 53, 361–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Severinson-Eklundh, K. 1986. Dialogue Processes in Computer-Mediated Communication. Linkoping Studies in Arts and Science, 6. Malmö: Liber Forlag AB.Google Scholar
Stevick, E.W. 1976. Memory Meaning and Method. Rowley, Mass.: Newbury House Publishers Inc.Google Scholar