Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:09:07.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Om preposisjonens syntaktiske status i de såkalte ≪transitive verbalgrupper≫ i norsk*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

John Ole Askedal
John Ole Askedal
Affiliation:
John Ole Askedal, Universitetet i Oslo, Germanistisk institutt, avd. A, P.O. Box 1004, Blindern, N-Oslo 3, Norway.
Get access

Abstract

The present article aims to show that the prepositions in so-called “transitive verb groups” in Norwegian, like, e.g., på and til in passe på and ta hensyn til, respectively, are not to be conflated with the real verb particles in cases like drikke opp etc. The two groups of words have quite distinct semantico syntactic properties. In particular, the NP constituent in cases like drikke opp vinen is subject to the well-known non-specificity condition at work in Norwegian impersonal passive constructions with a purely formal subject det, whereas its counterpart in cases like passe på hunden is not. This difference is readily accounted for if it is assumed that prepositions are a rudimentary species of one-place predicates, where the one argument to be found cannot be classified as either a logical or syntactic subject or object.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 5 , Issue 2 , December 1982 , pp. 133 - 162
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

LITTERATUR

Allwood, , Jens, , Andersson, , Lars-Gunnar og Dahl, østen 1977: Logic in Linguistics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-London-New York-Melbourne.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askedal, , John, Ole 1976: Innføring i tysk grammatikk. Universitetsforlaget, OsloBergen-Tromsø.Google Scholar
Askedal, , John, Ole, 1980: Rektion und Valenz: Einige Grundbegriffe der deut schen Valenzgrammatik (II). Språk og språkundervisning 13/4, 45–49.Google Scholar
Askedal, , John, Ole, 1981: Deutshe Satzmuster (II), Språk og språkundervisning 14/4, 48–59.Google Scholar
Bechert, , Johannes, , Clément, , Danièle, , Thämmel, , Wolflog, Wagner, Karl, Heinz 1970: Einfährung in die generative Transformationsgrammatik. Max Hueber, Mänchen.Google Scholar
Bresnan, , Joan, 1978: A Realistic Transformational Grammar. Morris Halle, I et al. (eds.) 1978, pp. 1–59.Google Scholar
Bresnan, , Joan, ms. 1980: The Passive in Lexical Theory. Center of Cognitive Science, MIT, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, , Noam, A. 1965: Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Chomsky, , Noam, A. 1975: Questions of Form and Interpretation. Linguistic Analysis, 1, 75–109.Google Scholar
Chomsky, , Noam, A. 1980: Rules and Representations. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, , Noam, A. 1981: Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris Publication, Dordecht, Holland–Cinnaminson, USA.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, , Paul, 1962: Elementær Dansk Grammatik. 3. Udg. Gyldendal, København.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, , Cathrine, 1975: Transformative, intransformative uns kursive Verben. Max Niemeryer, Täbingen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossestøl, , Bernt, 1980: Tekst og tekststruktur. Veier og mål i tekstlinguistikken. Universitesforlaget, Oslo–Bergen–Tromsø.Google Scholar
Fretheim, , Thorstein, 1974: Some Cases of Accent Shift in East Norwegian. Norwegian Journal of Linguistics (NTS) 28, 113–129.Google Scholar
Fretheim, , Thorstein, (ed.) 1977: Sentrale problemer i norsk syntaks. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo–Bergen–Tromsø.Google Scholar
Fretheim, , Thorstein, og Halvorsen, Per-Kristian, 1975: Norwegian Cliticization. Dahlstedt, I, Karl-Hampus, (ed.) 1975: The Nordic Languages and Modern Linguistics 2. Almqvist & Wiksell International, Stockholm, pp. 446–465.Google Scholar
Faarlund, , Jan, Terje 1980: Norsk syntaks i funksjonelt perspektiv. Universitetsforlaget, Oslo–Bergen–Tromsø.Google Scholar
Geach, , Peter, T. 1975: Names and Identity. I, Samuel Guttenplan (ed.) 1975: Mind and Language. Wolfson College Lectures 1974. Clarendon Press, Oxford–London, pp. 139–158.Google Scholar
Halle, , Morris, , Bresnan, , Joan, og Miller, George, A. (eds.) 1978. Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.–London.Google Scholar
Harman, , Gilbert, 1975: Logical Form. Davidson, I., Donald, og Harman, Gilbert, (eds.) 1975: The Logic of Grammar. Dickenson Publishing Company, Encino, Cal.–Belmont, Cal., pp. 289–307.Google Scholar
Harrison, , Bernard, 1979: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Language. Macmillan, London–Basingstoke.Google Scholar
Helbing, , Gerhard, og Schenkel, Wolfang, 1973: Wörterbuch zur Valenz und Distribution deutscher Verben. 2. Aufl. VEB Bibliographisches Institut, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Hellan, , Lars, 1977: Variasjon over grammatisk tema: form og innhold i norsk. Thorstein Fretheim I (ed.) 1977, pp. 69–112.Google Scholar
Hovdhaugen, , Even, 1977: Om og omkring passiv i norsk. Thorstein Fretheim, I (ed.) 1977, pp. 15–46.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, , Ray, S. 1973: The Base Rules for Prepositional Phrases. Anderson, I, Stephen, R. og kiparsky, Paul, (eds.) 1973: A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York etc., pp. 345–365.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, , Ray, S. 1977: XāSyntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.–London.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, , Ray, S. 1978. Grammar as Evidence for Conceptual Structure. Morris Halle, I et al. (eds.) 1978, pp. 201–228.Google Scholar
Johannisson, , Ture, , Kärner, , Rudolv, , Loman, , Bengt, , Ljunggreen, K.G., Pipping, , Rolflog, Wallin, Isak, 1964: Nutidussvenska. Uppsatser i grammatik. Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm–Gäteborg–Uppsala.Google Scholar
Keenan, , Edward, L. og Comrie, Bernard, 1977: Noun Phrase Accessibility and Universal Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 8 63–100.Google Scholar
Kempson, , Ruth, M. 1975: Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge Univeristy Press. Cambridge–London–New York–Melbourne.Google Scholar
Käner, , Rudolv, 1948: Studier äver syntaktisk nybildning i svenskan. I. De prepositionella passivbildningarna med hänsyntagen till motsvarande nybildningar, i danskan norskan och engelskan. Gleerup, Lund.Google Scholar
Kärner, , Rudolv, 1964: Objektet – en studie i analytisk syntax. I Ture Johannisson et al. 1964, pp. 43–150.Google Scholar
Kulbrandstad, , Lars, Anders 1978: Presenteringskonstruksjonen i moderne norsk – struktur, funksjon og bruk. Hovedoppgave ved Institutt for nordisk spréog litteratur, Universitetet i Oslo.Google Scholar
Kuno, , Susmo, 1976: Subject, Theme, and the Speaker's Empathy – A Reexamination of Relativization Phenomena. Li, I, Charles, N. (ed.) (1976): Subject and Topic. Academic press. New York–San Franciso–London, pp. 417–444Google Scholar
Lie, , Svein, , 1978: Mer om transitive verbalgrupper. Norskrift 19, 43–51.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, , David, W. 1979a: Rule Classes and Syntactic Change. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 83–108.Google Scholar
Lightfood, , David, W. 1979b: Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge University Press. Cambridge–London–New York–Melbourne.Google Scholar
Lynos, , John, 1977: Semantics 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–London–New York–Melbourne.Google Scholar
Lynos, , John, 1981: Language, Meaning and Context. Fontana, Bungay, Suffolk.Google Scholar
Matthews, , Peter, H. 1981: Syntax. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge–London–New York–Melbourne.Google Scholar
Miller, , George, A. og Johnson-Laird, Philip, N. 1976: Language and Perception. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.–London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milsark, , Gary, L. 1979: Existential Sentences in English. Garland Publishing Company, New York–London.Google Scholar
Quine, , Willard, Van Orman 1952: On What There Is. Linsky, I, Leonard, (ed.) 1952: Semantics and the Philosophy of Language. A Collection of Readings. University of Illinois Press, Urbana–Chicago–London, pp. 189–206.Google Scholar
Quine, , Willard, Van Orman 1960: Word and Object. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass..Google Scholar
Quine, , Willand, Van Orman 1966: Methods of Logic. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
Quirk, , Randolph, , Greenbaum, , Sidney, , Leech, , Geoffrey, og Svartvik, 01 1972: A Grammar of Contemporary English. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Ross, , John, Robert 1972: The Category Squish: Endstation Hauptwort. Peranteau, I, Paul, M., Levi, , Judith, N. og Phares, Gloria, C. (eds.) 1972: Papers from the Eitght Regional Meeting Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 316–328.Google Scholar
Saltveit, , Laurits, 1970: Synonymik und Homonymie im deutschen Tempus–system. Moser, I, Hugo, et al. (eds.) 1970: Studien zur Syntax des heutigen Deutsch. Paul Grebe Zum 60. Geburtstag. Schwann, Dässeldorf, pp. 137–153.Google Scholar
Sandmann, , Manfred, 1954: Subject and Predicate. A Contribution to the Theory of Syntax. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Strang, , Barbara, M.H. 1968: Modern English Structure. Arnold, London.Google Scholar
Strawson, , Peter, F. 1964: Individuals. An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Strawson, , Peter, F. 1967: Singular Terms and Predication. Strawson, I, Peter, F. (ed.) 1967: Philosophical Logic. Oxford University Press, Oxford etc., pp. 69–88.Google Scholar
Strawson, , Peter, F. 1974: Subject and Predicate in Logic and Grammar. Methuen, London.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, , Kunt, Tarald 1979: Remarks on Some Central Problems of Norwegian Syntax. A Review Article. Nordic journal of Linguistics, 2, 23–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesnière, , Lucien, , 1966: Éläments de syntaxe structurale. 2. d. Libraire, C. Klincksieck, Paris.Google Scholar
Wallin, , Isak, 1964: Om det grammatiske subjektet som språklig upplevelse. I Johannisson, Ture et al. 1964, pp. 257–319.Google Scholar
Werner, , Otmar, 1978: Der bestimmte Artikel als All-Quantor. Hartmann, I, Dietrich, , Linke, , Handjärgen, og Ludwig, Otto, (eds.) 1978: Sprache in Gegenwart und Geschichte. Festschrift fär Heinrich Matthias Heinrichs zum 65. Geburtstag. Bählau, Käln–Wien, pp. 215–235.Google Scholar