Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:20:58.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Nearly a million Ostrobothnians cannot be wrong: comments on an Optimality Theoretic analysis of “Ostrobothnian”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Kari Suomi
Affiliation:
Department of Finnish and Saami and Logopedics, Linnanmaa, P.O. Box 1000, 90014Oulu University, Finland. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Debate
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Harrikari, H. 1999. Epenthesis, Geminates, and the OCP in Finnish. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 22, 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karlsson, F. 1983. Suomen kielen äänne- ja muotorakenne. [The Structure of Finnish Phonology and Morphology.] Juva: WSOY.Google Scholar
Kettunen, L. 1940. Suomen murteet IIIa. Murrekartasto. Suomalaisen Kirjallisuuden Seura. [Finnish Dialects IIIa. Dialect Atlas. Finnish Literature Society].Google Scholar
Sovijärvi, A. 1937. Foneettisia havaintoja Tornionjoen ja Pohjanmaan murteiden svaavokaaleista. [Phonetic Observations on Schwa in the Tornionjoki and the Ostrobothnian Dialects.] Suomi 5.19, 129.Google Scholar
Suomi, K. 1990. Huomioita yleiskielen konsonanttien yhdistelyrajoituksista ja pohjalaismurteiden epenteettisestä vokaalista. [Observations on Restrictions on Consonant Combinations in Standard Finnish and on Epenthetic Vowels in the Ostrobothnian Dialects.] Virittäjä 94, 139160.Google Scholar
Wiik, K. 1965. Finnish and English Vowels. Turku: Publications of University of Turku, B, 94.Google Scholar