Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-21T23:36:01.117Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Laryngeal Activity in Icelandic Obstruent Production1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Andres Löfqvist  and
Hirohide Yoshioka
Andres Löfqvist
Affiliation:
Department of Phonetics, Helgonabacken 12, S–223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Hirohide Yoshioka
Affiliation:
Research Institute of Logopedics and Phoniatrics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo, Tokyo 113, Japan.
Get access

Abstract

Laryngeal activity in the production of voiceless obstruents and obstruent clusters in Icelandicwas investigated by the combined techniques of transillumination and fiberoptic filming of the larynx. Contrasts of preaspirated, unaspirated, and postaspirated voiceless stops were found to be produced basically by differences in laryngeal-oral timing. In clusters of voiceless obstruents, one or more continuous laryngeal opening and closing gestures occurred depending on the segments in the cluster.Peak velocity of glottal abduction was higher for fricatives than for stops. This, and other differences in laryngeal adjustments and interarticulator timing between stops and fricatives, are most likely due to different aerodynamic requirements for stop and fricative production. The present results further question the usefulness of timeless feature descriptions for modeling speech production.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , June 1981 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, S. R.. 1974: The Organization of Phonology. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bernstein, N. 1967: The Co-ordination and Regulation of Movements. Pergamon Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bladon, R. A. 1979: Motor control of coarticulation: Linguistic Considerations. In Proceedings of the Ninth Internationl Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Vol. 2, 325–331.Google Scholar
Boylls, C. C. 1975: A theory of cerebellar function with applications to locomotion. II. The relation of anterior lobe climbing fiber function to locomotor behaviour in the cat. COINS Technical Report 76–1, (Department of Computer and Information Science, University of Massachusetts).Google Scholar
Daniloff, R., & Hammarberg, R.. 1973: On defining coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics 1, 239–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. A.. 1980: Coarticulation and theories of extrinsic timing. Journal of Phonetics 8, 113–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, C. A., Rubin, P., Remez, R. & Turvey, M. 1980: Implications for speech production of a general theory of action. In Butterworth, B. (ed.) Language Production. Academic Press, New York, pp. 373–420.Google Scholar
Greene, P. H. 1971: Introduction. In Gelfand, I. M.,Gurfinkel, V. S., Fomin, S. V., & Tsetlin, M. L. (eds.) Models of the structural-Functional Organization of Certain Biological Systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. xi–xxxi.Google Scholar
Greene, P. H. 1972: Problems of organization of motor systems. In Rosen, R. & Snell, F. (eds.) Progress in Theoretical Biology. Academic Press, New York, vol. 2, pp. 303–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grillner, S. 1975: Locomotion in vertebrates: Central mechanisms and reflex interaction. Physiological Reviews 55, 247–304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halle, M., & Stevens, K. 1971: A note on laryngeal features. Quarterly Progress Report (Research Laboratory of Electronics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 101, 198–213.Google Scholar
Hammarberg, R. 1976: The metaphysics of coarticulation. Journal of phonetics 4, 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, J.A.S., Holt, K.G., Kulger, P.N., &Turvey, M.T. 1980: On the concept of coordinative structures as disspative structures: II.Empirical lines of convergence. In Stelmach, G.E. & Requin, J. (eds.) Tutorials in Motor Behavior. North Holland Publishing Company, Amsterdam, p. 49–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelso, J.A.S., Southard, D.L., &Goodman, D. 1979: On the Coordination of two-handed movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 5, 229–238.Google ScholarPubMed
Kewley-Port, D. 1977: EMG single processing of speech research. Haskins Laboratories Status Report on Speech Research SR–50, 123–146.Google Scholar
Ladeforged, P. 1976: The feature of the larynx. Journal of phonetics 1, 73–83.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., &Abramson, A. 1971: Distinctive features and laryngeal control. Language 47, 767–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löfqvist, A. in press: Interarticulator programimg in stop production. Journal of phonetics, in press.Google Scholar
Löfqvist, A. & Yoshioka, H. 1980: Laryngeal activity in Swedish obstruent clusters. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 68, 792–801.Google ScholarPubMed
Löfqvist, A., & Yoshioka, H. 1980: Scaling of glottal opening. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67, S53A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nashner, L. M. 1977: Fixed pattern of rapid postural responces among leg muscles during stance. Experimental Brain Research 30, 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pétursson, M. 1976: Aspration et activité glottale. Phonetica 33, 169–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pétursson, M. 1978: Jointure au niveau glottale. Phonetica 35, 65–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rothenberg, M. 1968: The Breath-Stream Dynamics of Simple-Released-Plosive Production. (Bibliotheca Phonetica, vol 6) Karger, Basel.Google Scholar
Stevens, K. 1971: Airflow and turbulence noise for fricative and stop consonants: Static considerations. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 50, 1180–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuller, B., & Harris, K. S. 1980: Temporal models of interarticular Programming. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67, S64(A).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turvey, M. T. 1977: Preliminars to a theory of action with reference to vision. In Shaw, R. & Bransford, J. (eds.) Perceiving, Acting and Knowing. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., pp. 211–265.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, H., Löfqvist, A., & Hirose, H. 1979: Laryngeal adjustments in the production of consonant clusters and geminate in American English. Haskins laboratories Status Report on Speech research SR–59/60, 127–151.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, H., Löfqvist, A. & Hirose, H. 1980: Laryngeal adjustments in Japanese vioceless sound production. Haskins laboratories Status Report on Speech research 67, S52(A).Google Scholar