Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-g4j75 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T09:16:33.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Jon Sprouse & Norbert Hornstein (eds.), Experimental Syntax and Island Effects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013. Pp. x + 421.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 November 2014

Fredrik Heinat
Fredrik Heinat*
Affiliation:
Department of Languages, Linnæus University, 351 95 Växjö, Sweden. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , December 2014 , pp. 463 - 470
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allwood, Jens. 1976. The complex NP constraint as a non-universal rule and some semantic factors influencing the acceptability of Swedish sentences which violate the CNPC. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 2, 1–20.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2012. Syntactic Islands. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj, Kizach, Johannes & Nyvad, Anne Mette. 2013. Escape from the island: Grammaticality and (reduced) acceptability of wh-island violations in Danish. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 42, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, Ken Ramshøj & Nyvad, Anne Mette. 2014. On the nature of escapable relative islands. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 37, 29–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, William D. & Dubinsky, Stanley. 2003. On extraction from NPs. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 21, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet. 1997. Relative clause extractions in context. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 60, 51–79.Google Scholar
Engdahl, Elisabet & Ejerhed, Eva (eds.). 1982. Readings on Unbounded Dependencies in Scandinavian Languages. Umeå: Umeå University.Google Scholar
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1973. On the Nature of Island Constraints. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Hofmeister, Philip, Casasanto, Laura Staum & Sag, Ivan A.. 2012. How do individual cognitive differences relate to acceptability judgments? A reply to Sprouse, Wagers, and Phillips. Language 88, 390–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmeister, Philip & Sag, Ivan A.. 2010. Cognitive constraints and island effects. Language 86, 366–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kluender, Robert & Kutas, Marta. 1993. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes 8, 573–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, Christiane. 2014. Swedish relative clause extractions: The small clause hypothesis. Master's thesis, Lund University.Google Scholar
Phillips, Colin. 2013. Some arguments and nonarguments for reductionist accounts of syntactic phenomena. Language and Cognitive Processes 28, 156–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. [Published as Infinite Syntax, Ablex, 1986.]Google Scholar
Sprouse, Jon. 2007. Continous acceptability, categorical grammaticality, and experimental syntax. Biolinguistics 1, 118–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sprouse, Jon, Wagers, Matthew & Phillips, Colin. 2012. A test of the relation between working memory capacity and syntactic island effects. Language 88, 82–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar