Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-05T18:28:22.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

John A. Goldsmith: Autosegmental & Metrical Phonology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1990. 376 pp. ISBN 0-631-13675-4. ISBN 0-631-13676-2 pbk.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Rolf Theil Endresen
Rolf Theil Endresen
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, University of Oslo, PO Box 1012 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo 3, Norway.
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , June 1991 , pp. 81 - 87
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

CLS Chicago Linguistic Society; IULC Indiana University Linguistic Club;.JL Journal of Linguistics; LI Linguistic Inquiry; PY Phonology Yearbook.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. M. & Jones, C. (eds.) 1974. Historical Phonology. Vol. 2. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Brockelmann, C. 1982. Arabische Grammatik. Leipzig: Max Hueber Verlag.Google Scholar
Bruck, A., Fox, R. A. & La, Galy M. W. (eds.) 1974. Papers from the Parasession on Natural Phonology, April 18, 1974. Chicago: CLS.Google Scholar
Bybee, J. L. 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bybee, J. L. 1988. Morphology as lexical organization. In Hammond, & Noonan, 1988), pp. 119–141.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. & Halle, M. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Clements, O. N. & Keyser, S. J. 1983. CV Phonology. LI Monograph Series, 9. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crothers, J. 1978. Typology and Universals of Vowel Systems. In Greenberg (1978), pp. 93–152.Google Scholar
Durand, J. 1990. Generative and Non-linear Phonology. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Fischer, W. 1972. Grammatik des Klassischen Arabisch. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar
Fudge, E. 1969. Syllables. IL 5, 253–286.Google Scholar
Fudge, E. 1987. Branching Structure Within the Syllable. JL 23, 359–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenberg, J. H. 1978. Universals of Human Language. Vol. 2. Stanford: Stanford UP.Google Scholar
Hammond, M. & Noonan, M. 1988. Theoretical Morphology. Approaches in Modern Linguistics. San Diego: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haspelmath, M. 1989. Schemas in Hausa Plural Formation. Buffalo Working Papers in Linguistics, 32–74.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. 1976. An Introduction to Natural Generative Phonology. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hudson, G. 1986. Arabic Root Pattern Morphology Without Tiers. JL 22, 85–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hulst, H. van der & Smith, N. 1982. The Structure of Phonological Representations, Part I, II. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.Google Scholar
Hyman, L. M. 1985. A Theory of Phonological Weight. Dordrecht: Foris Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeger, J. J. 1986. On the Acquisition of Abstract Representations for English Vowels. PY 3, 71–97.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. 1974a. Phonology, Morphology, and Morphophonemics. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, 23. Göteborg: Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. 1974b. Centrala problem i finskans bõjningsmorfologi, morfofonematik och fonologi. Suomi 117, 2. Helsinki: Suomen Kirjallisuuden Seura.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. 1974c. Phonology, Morphology, and Morphophonemics: General Theory with Application to Finnish. (Summary of a doctoral dissertation.) Publ. of the Phonetics Dept. of the University of Turku. Finland.Google Scholar
Klingenheben, A. 1927–1928. Die Silbenauslautgesetze des Hausa. Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen 18, 272–297.Google Scholar
Koerner, E. F. K. (ed.) 1975. The Transformational-Generative Paradigm and Modern Linguistic Theory. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1979. Formal Problems in Semitic Phonology and Morphology. PhD Diss., MIT. Bloomington, Indiana: IULC.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1981. A Prosodic Theory of Nonconcatenative Morphology. LI 12, 373–418.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. 1982. Prosodic Templates, Morphemic Templates, and Morphemic Tiers. In Hulst & Smith (1982, Part I).Google Scholar
McCawley, J. D. 1986. Today the World, Tomorrow Phonology. PY 3, 27–43.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. J. 1974. Experimental Historical Phonology. In Anderson & Jones (1974).Google Scholar
Sampson, G. R. 1975. One Fact Needs One Explanation. Lingua 36, 231–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sampson, G. R. 1980. Schools of Linguistics. Competition and Evolution. London: Hutchinson.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinberg, D. D. & Krohn, R. K. 1975. The Psychological Reality of Chomsky and Halle's Vowel Shift Rule. In Koerner (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vennemann, T. 1974. Words and Syllables in Natural Generative Grammar. In Bruck, et al. 1974).Google Scholar
Vennemann, T. 1988. Preference Laws for Syllable Structure and the Explanation of Sound Change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wang, H. S. & Derwing, B. L. 1986. More on English Vowel Shift: The Back Vowel Question. PY 3, 99–116.Google Scholar