Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:24:31.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intonational Phrasing in Norwegian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Thorstein Fretheim
Thorstein Fretheim
Affiliation:
Universited i Trondheim, Norges laererhögskole, Linguisisk institutt, N-7055 Dragvoll, Norway.
Get access

Abstract

This paper outlines a model designed for the description of East Norwegian sencetece intonation. It is argued that there is a specific kind of intonational structure in Norwegian that is restricted to assertions and which will therefore normally be perceived as a prosodic clue to the indentification of assertive clauses, whether embedded ro syntactically independent.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , December 1981 , pp. 111 - 137
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, J. L. 1962: How to Do Things with Words. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bever, T. G. 1970: The Cognitive Basis for Linguistic Structures. In Hayes, J. R. (ed.): Cognition and the Development of Language. John Wiley and Sons, New York.Google Scholar
Clark, H. H. and Clark, E. V. 1968: Semantic Distinctions and Memory for Complex Sentences. Quarterly Journal for Experimental Psychology 20, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, H. H. and Clark, E. V. 1977: Psychology and Language. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
Emonds, J. E. 1976: A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. Acaderaic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Frazier, L. 1979: On Comprehending Sentences: Syntactic Parsing Strategies. IULC.Google Scholar
Fretheim, T., 1974. Pragmatic Constraints on the Use of a Syntactic Construction in Norwegian. In Dahl, Ö (ed.): Papers from First Scadinavian Conference of Linguistics. University of Göteborg. pp 113–130.Google Scholar
Fretheim, T. 1978. When Syntax Fails to Determine Semantic Scope. In Gårding, E.et al. (ed.) Nordic Prosody, Lund University. pp. 5–14.Google Scholar
Fretheim, T. 1981: The Prosodic Structure of Norwegian Tag Sequences. In Fretheim, T. (ed.): Nordic prosody II. Tapir, Trondheim, pp. 141–152.Google Scholar
Fretheim, T. (forthcoming), Forholdet mellom fokus og ny informasjon i norsk grammatikk.Google Scholar
Guldal, R. 1977: Språklige uttrykk for a˚rasksrelasjonen i et telemålsmateriale, thesis, Department of Nordic Studies. University of Oslo.Google Scholar
Hooper, J. B. and Thompson, S. A. 1973: On the Applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry IV:4, 465–498.Google Scholar
Kimball, J. 1973: Seven Principles of Sruface Structure Parsing in Natural Language. Cognition 2, 15–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liberman, M. 1975: An Intonational System of English. MIT thesis.Google Scholar
Liberman, M. and Prince, A. 1977: On Stress and Linguistic Rhythm. Linguistic Inquiry VIII:2, 249–336.Google Scholar
Quirk, R. & Greenbaum, S. & Leech, G. & Svartvik, J. 1972: A Grammar of Contemporary English. Longman, London.Google Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1969: Speech Acts. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, J. R. 1979: Expression and Meaning. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, E. O. 1981. On Prosodic Structure and its Relation to Syntactic Structure. In: Fretheim, T. (ed.): Nordic prosody II Tapir, Trondheim, pp. 111–140.Google Scholar