Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:44:13.188Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In search of the force of dependent verb second

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 April 2010

Anna-Lena Wiklund
Anna-Lena Wiklund*
Affiliation:
Centre for Languages and Literature/NORMS, Lund University, Box 201, 221 00 Lund, Sweden. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This short communication is a brief extension of recent work on verb second (V2) in Scandinavian declarative clauses and a contribution to research on the relation between V2 and illocutionary force. It is argued that Swedish data present a problem for the hypothesis that a bi-conditional relation holds between the illocutionary force of an assertion and V2 word order. The relevant force, to the extent that we can identify it, appears to be available also in the absence of V2 word order. It is tentatively suggested that V2 encodes evidentiality.

Keywords

assertionevidentialityillocutionary forceSwedishV2
Type
Short Communications
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , May 2010 , pp. 81 - 91
Copyright
Copyright © Nordic Association of Linguistics 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersson, Lars-Gunnar. 1975. Form and Function of Subordinate Clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Gothenburg, Gotenburg.Google Scholar
den Besten, Hans. 1983. On the interaction of root transformations and lexical deletive rules. In Abraham, Werner (ed.), On the Formal Syntax of the Westgermania, 47–131. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2002. On the force of V2 declaratives. Theoretical Linguistics 28 33–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gärtner, Hans-Martin. 2003. How Icelandic can you be if you speak Icelandic B? In Delsing, Lars-Olof, Falk, Cecilia, Josefsson, Gunlög & Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann (eds.), Grammar in Focus: Festschrift for Christer Platzack, 18 november 2003, 115–122. Lund: Institutionen för nordiska språk, Lunds Universitet.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 2006. Embedded root phenomena. In Everaert, Martin & van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, vol. II, 174–209. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooper, Joan & Thompson, Sandra. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4 465–497.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn & Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2009. General embedded V2: Icleandic A, B, C, etc. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84 21–51.Google Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gísli. 1996. Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2007. Embedded V2 in Norwegian and Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 80 103–161.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2008. On embedded V2 in Mainland Scandinavian. NORMS Workshop on Root Phenomena and the Left Periphery, Tromsø, 20 May 2008.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2009. The force of the argument. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84 225–232.Google Scholar
Reis, Marga. 2006. Is German V-to-C movement really semantically motivated? Some empirical problems. Theoretical Linguistics 32 369–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John & Vanderveken, Daniel. 1985. Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simons, Mandy. 2007. Observations on embedding verbs, evidentiality, and presupposition. Lingua 117 1034–1056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Tenny, Carol. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Di Sciullo, Anna Maria (ed.), Asymmetry in Grammar, 315–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2006. On the semantic motivation of syntactic verb movement to C in German. Theoretical Linguistics 32 257–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, Stephen. 1991. Verb second and illocutionary force. In Leffel, Katherine & Bouchard, Denis (eds.), Views on Phrase Structure, 177–191. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2009a. In search of the force of dependent V2: A note on Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 83 27–36.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2009b. May the force be with you: A reply from the 5th floor. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 84 233–236.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Bentzen, Kristine, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg. 2009. On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua 119 (12), 1914–1938.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, Bentzen, Kristine & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg. 2007. Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10 (3), 203–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax–semantics interface. Language 79 39–81.Google Scholar