We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
References
REFERENCES
Carlson, L.1983Dialogue Games. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R.1957. Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Hakulinen, A.1983. Subjektikategoria vai nominaalijäsenten sunjektimaisuus. In Hakulinen, A. & Leino, P. (eds.), Nykysuomen rakenne ja kehitys. Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, pp. 238–251.Google Scholar
Hakulinen, A, Karlsson, F. & Vilkuna, M.1980. Suomen tekstilauseiden piirteitä kvantitatiiven tutkimus. Dept. of General Linguistics, Universiyt of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Halle, M. & Vergnaud, J. R.1982. On the Framework of Autosegmental Phonology. In Van, der Hulst H. & Smith, N. (eds.), The Structure of Phonological Representations: Part I. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 65–82Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.1985. An Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Halliday, M. A. K.1988. On the Ineffability of Grammatical Categories. In Benson, J., Cummings, M. & Greaves, W. (eds.), Linguistics in a Systematic Perspective. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, pp. 27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helasvuo, M.1988. Subjekteina ja objekteina toimivat nominilausekkeet puhutussa suomessa. Unpublished licentiate thesis, Dept. of Finnish, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar