Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-t27h7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-16T17:11:25.571Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cognitive Morphology in Swedish: Studies with Normals and Aphasics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Elisabeth Ahlsén
Elisabeth Ahlsén
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg, S-41298 Göteborg, Sweden, Email: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A multiple methods approach was applied to the study of morphology on the processing of lexical items in Swedish. Data from slips-of-the-tongue, agrammatic speech production, agrammatic oral reading, and lexical decision experiments were used. The results indicate that whole word processing as well as morphological processing takes place in the different types of tasks. The type of processing seems to vary along a continuum, with whole word processing as the most commonly applied type in automatized and relatively simple processing (such as lexical decision for common Swedish words), whereas signs of morpheme-based processing appear less often, and perhaps in less automatized tasks (such as agrammatic speech production).

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , June 1994 , pp. 61 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahlsén, E. & Dravins, C. 1991. Agrammatism in Swedish: Two Case Studies. In Menn, L. & Obler, L. K. (eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-language Narrative Source Book. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Allén, S. 1971–1980. Nusvensk frekvensordbok. Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell.Google Scholar
Badecker, W. & Caramazza, A. 1991. Morphological Composition in the Lexical Output System. Cognitive Neuropsychology 8, 335–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butterworth, B. 1982. Speech Errors: Old Data in Search of New Theories. Linguistics 19–7/8, 627–662.Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. 1983. Lexical Representation. In. Butterworth, B. (ed.), Language Production. London: Academic Press, Vol. 2, pp. 257–294.Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. 1989. Lexical Access in Speech Production. In Marslen-Wilson, W. (ed.), Lexical Representation and Process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A. & Romani, C. 1988. Lexical Access and Inflection Morphology. Cognition 28, 297–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coltheart, M. 1980. Reading, Phonological Recoding, and Deep Dyslexia. In Coltheart, M., Patterson, K. & Marshall, J. C. (eds.), Deep Dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dell, G. 1986. A Spreading-Activation Theory of Retrieval in Sentence Production. Psychlogical Review 93, 283–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dell, G. & Reich, P. 1981. Stages in Sentence Production: An Analysis of Speech-Error Data. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 20, 611–629.Google Scholar
Eikmeyer, H.-J. & Schade, U. 1991. Sequentialization in Connectionist Language-Production Models. Cognitive Systems 3–2, 128–138.Google Scholar
Frauenfelder, U. & Schreuder, R. 1991. Constraining Psycholinguistic Models of Morphological Processing and Representation: The Role of Productivity. In Booij, G. & van Merle, J. (eds.), Yearbook of Morphology. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 1991.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. 1971. The Non-Anomalous Structure of Anomalous Utterances. Language 17, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, M. 1980. Levels of Processing in Sentence Production. In Butterworth, B. (ed.), Language Production. London: Academic Press, Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Garrett, M. 1982. Production of Speech: Observations from Normal and Pathological Language. In Ellis, A. W. (ed.), Normality and Pathology in Cognitive Functions. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Garrett, M. 1988. Processes in Language Production. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, III, 69–96.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H. & Kaplan, E. 1972. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Jarvella, R. & Wennstedt, O. 1993. Recognition of Partial Regularity in Words and Sentences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 34, 76–85.Google Scholar
Kostiç, A. & Katz, L. 1987. Processing Differences between Nouns, Adjectives, and Verbs. Psychological Research 49, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laine, M., Niemi, J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P., Ahlsén, E. & Hyönä, J. 1993. Morphological Paralexias in a Finnish–Swedish Bilingual Aphasic. Forthcoming in Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lukatela, G., Glogorijevic, B., Kostiç, A. & Turvey, M. 1980. Representation of Inflected Nouns in the Internal Lexicon. Memory and Cognition 8, 415–423.Google Scholar
Niemi, J., Laine, M. & Tuominen, J. 1993. Cognitive Morphology in Finnish: Foundations for a New Model (ms)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, M. 1987. The Assessment of Bilingual Aphasia. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Patterson, K. 1981. Neuropsychological Approaches to the Study of Reading. British Journal of Psychology 72, 151–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semenza, C., Butterworth, B., Panzeri, M. & Ferreri, T. 1990. Word-Formation: New Evidence from Aphasia. Neuropsychologia 28, 499–502.Google Scholar
Stark, J. 1988. Aspects of Automatic versus Controlled Processing, Monitoring Metalinguistic Tasks and Related Phenomena in Aphasia. In Dressler, W. U. & Stark, J. (eds.), Linguistic Analyses of Aphasic Language. New York: Springer Verlag, pp. 179–223.Google Scholar
Stemberger, J. 1985. An Interactive-Activation Model of Language Production. In Ellis, A. (ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language, London: Erlbaum, Vol. 1, pp. 143–186.Google Scholar
Söderpalm, E. 1979. Speech Errors in Normal and Pathological Speech. Travaux de l'Institut de Linguistique de Lund. XIV.Google Scholar
Taft, M. & Forster, K. 1975. Lexical Storage and Retrieval of Prefixed Words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 14, 638–647.Google Scholar