Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:22:08.598Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Aspiration, Preaspiration, Deaspiration, Sonorant Devoicing and Spirantization in Icelandic1

Review products

RingenCatherine O. 1999. Aspiration, Preaspiration, Deaspiration, Sonorant Devoicing and Spirantization in Icelandic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 22, 137–156.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2010

Catherine O. Ringen
Catherine O. Ringen
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA
Get access

Extract

This paper presents a novel analysis of aspiration, preaspiration, and the related phenomena of sonorant devoicing and spirantization in an Optimality Theoretic framework. Central to the analysis are two constraints: one requires that the feature [spread glottis] be shared by adjacent consonants, and another prohibits moraic [spread glottis] stops. Aspirated stops are singleton stops that are specified as [spread glottis]. Unaspirated stops either have no [spread glottis] feature or share a [spread glottis] feature with another consonant. There is no movement of aspiration or the [spread glottis] feature from one segment to another as in earlier analyses. This account is fully in accord with phonetic descriptions and is of theoretical interest because it supports the fission analysis of preaspiration and is consistent with the assumption that geminates are moraic consonants.

Type
Review Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , December 1999 , pp. 137 - 156
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beckman, J. 1997. Positional Faithfulness, Positional Neutralisation, and Shona Vowel Harmony. Phonology 14.1, 1–46.Google Scholar
Beckman, J. 1998. Positional Faithfulness. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
Benua, L. 1995. Identity Effects in Morphological Truncation. In Beckman, J., Dickey, L., & Urbanczyk, S. (eds), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA, 77–136.Google Scholar
Gibson, C. St. J. 1997. Icelandic Phonology in Optimality Theory. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Iowa.Google Scholar
Hayes, B. 1989. Compensatory Lengthening in Moraic Phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 253–306.Google Scholar
Hermans, B. 1984. The Relation between Aspiration and Preaspiration in Icelandic. In van der Hulst, H. & Smith, N. (eds), Advances in Nonlinear Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris Publications, 237–266.Google Scholar
Itô, J., Mester, A. 1998. Markedness and Word Structure: OCP Effects in Japanese. Ms., UC Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Iverson, G., Salmons, J. 1995. Aspiration and Laryngeal Representation in Germanic. Phonology 12, 369–396.Google Scholar
Jónsson, J. 1994. The Feature [ASP] in Icelandic Phonology. Studia Linguistica 48.1, 28–45.Google Scholar
Kingston, J. 1990. Articulatory Binding. In Kingston, J. & Beckman, M. (eds), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 406–450.Google Scholar
Löfqvist, A., Yoshioka, H. 1981. Interarticulator Programming in Obstruent Production. Phonetica 38, 21–34.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J., Prince, A. 1986. Prosodic Morphology. Unpublished manuscript. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J., Prince, A. 1993. Prosodic Morphology I: Constraint Interaction and Satisfaction. Ms., University of Massachusetts and Rutgers University.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J., Prince, A. 1995. Faithfulness and Reduplicative Identity. In Beckman, J., Dickey, L., & Urbanczyk, S. (eds), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18: Papers in Optimality Theory. Amherst, Mass.: GLSA, 289–384.Google Scholar
Morén, B. 1998. The Puzzle of Kashmiri Stress: Implications for Weight Theory. Ms. University of Maryland (ROA-60, Rutgers Optimality Archive).Google Scholar
Morén, B., Miglio, V. 1998. A Unified Account of Icelandic Preaspiration and Spirantization. Paper presented at the Xth Conference of Nordic and General Linguistics, Reykjavik, Iceland.Google Scholar
Padgett, J. 1995. Partial Class Behavior and Nasal Place Assimilation. In Suzuki, K. & Elzinga, D. (eds), Proceedings of the Southwest Optimality Theory Workshop.Google Scholar
Prince, A., Smolensky, P. 1993. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Technical Report #2 of the Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Sigurjónsdóttir, S. 1990. Nokkur Orð um Aðbl´stur, Fr´bl´stur og Afröddun í Íslensku (Some Notes on Preaspiration, Postaspiration, and Devoicing in Icelandic). Íslenskt M´l og Aalmenn M´lfrœði 10–11, 130–137.Google Scholar
Selkirk, E. 1990. A Two-root Theory of Length. In Padgett, J. & Dunlop, E. (eds), UMOP 14. University of Massachusetts, Amherst: GLSA, 123–171.Google Scholar
Spaelti, P. 1994. Weak Edges and Final Geminates in Swiss German. NELS 24, 573–588.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H. 1978. On the Phonology of Icelandic Preaspiration. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 1, 3–54.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, H. 1994. Icelandic. In Konig, E. & van der Auwera, S. (eds), The Germanic Languages. New York: Routledge, 142–189.Google Scholar
Vaux, B. 1998. The Laryngeal Specifications of Fricatives. LI 29.1, 497–511.Google Scholar
Walker, R. 1998. Nasalization, Neutral Segments, and Opacity effects. Ph.D. Dissertation, UC Santa Cruz (forthcoming, Garland Publishers).Google Scholar