Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T01:55:26.741Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Object-oriented Dialogue System for Swedish1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Lars Ahrenberg
Lars Ahrenberg
Affiliation:
Linköping University, Department of Computer and Information Science, S-581 83 Linköping, Sweden.
Get access

Abstract

This paper describes the analysis component of a natural language dialogue system called FALIN. The most important features of the system are its modularity and the combination of an object-oriented semantics with a constraint-based grammar formalism. I also illustrate how constraints in the form of descriptor schemata can be used to capture general correspondences between syntactic and semantic structure and argue that the contribution of contextual factors to interpretation to some extent can be handled within the same framework.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 11 , Issue 1-2 , June 1988 , pp. 3 - 16
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahrenberg, L. 1987. Parsing into Discourse Object Descriptions. In Proceedings, Third Conference of the ACL European Chapter, Copenhagen 1–3 04, 1987, pp. 140–147.Google Scholar
Alshawi, H. 1987. Memory and Context for Language Interpretation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Appelo, L., Fellinger, C. & Landsbergen, J. 1987. Subgrammars, Rule Classes and Control in the Rosetta Translation System. In Proceedings, Third Conference of the ACL European Chapter, Copenhagen 1–3 04, 1987, pp. 118–133.Google Scholar
Bobrow, R. J. & Webber, B. L. 1980. Knowledge Representation for Syntactic/Semantic Processing. In Proceedings, First Annual National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stanford, 08 1980, pp. 316–323.Google Scholar
Dahlbäck, N. & Jönsson, A. 1986. A System for Studying Human-Computer Dia'ogues in Natural Language. Research Report LITH–IDA–86–42, Linköping University: Department of Computer and Information Science.Google Scholar
Danieli, M., Ferrara, F., Gemello, R. & Rullent, C. 1987. Integrating Semantics and Flexible Syntax by Exploiting Isomorphism between Grammatical and Semantical Relations. In Proceedings, Third European Chapter ACL Conference, Copenhagen, 04 1–3, 1987, pp. 278–283.Google Scholar
Fenstad, J. E., Halvorsen, P.-K., Langlolm, T. & van, Benthem J. 1985. Equations, Schemata and Situations: A Framework for Linguistic Semantics. Manuscript, CSLI, Stanford University.Google Scholar
Grosz, B. J. 1977. The Representation and Use of Focus in Dialogue Understanding. (PhD thesis). SRI Technical Note No. 151. Menlo Park: SRI International.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, P.-K. 1983. Semantics for Lexical-Functional Grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 14:4, 567–615.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, P.-K. 1987. Situation Semantics and Semantic Interpretation in Constraint-based Grammars. Technical Report CSLI–TR–87–101. Stanford, Centre for the Study of Language and Information.Google Scholar
Hirst, G. 1987. Semantic Interpretation and the Resolution of Ambiguity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, R. & Bresnan, J. 1982. Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation. In Bresnan, J. (ed.) 1982: The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, pp. 173–281.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. 1986. A Paradigm-based Morphological Analyzer. In Karlson, F. (ed.) 1986: Papers from the Fifth Scandinavian Conference of Computational Linguistics, Helsinki, December 11–12 1985. University of Helsinki: Helsinki, pp. 95–112.Google Scholar
Lytinen, S. L. 1987. Integrating Syntax and Semantics. In Nirenburg, S. (ed.) 1987: Machine Translation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 302–316.Google Scholar
Sondheimer, N. K., Weischedel, R. M. & Bobrow, R. J. 1984. Semantic Interpretation Using KL-ONE. In Proceedings of Coling '84, Stanford University, Cal. 2–6 07 1984, pp. 101–107.Google Scholar
Wachtel, T. 1987. Discourse Structure in LOQUI. In Recent Developments and Applications of Natural Language Understanding. London: UNICOM Seminars Ltd., pp. 161–186.Google Scholar