No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
The V2 Conspiracy. A Synchronic and a Diachronic Analysis
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 22 December 2008
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b8c54/b8c540ddd02504395a54e241d0d1f0951e1d39e6" alt="Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'"
- Type
- Review Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990
References
REFERENCES
Baker, M. 1988. Incorporation. A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, J.-Y. 1989. Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
Sigur°čsson, H. 1985. Subordinate V/1 in Icelandic, How to Explain a Root Phenomenon? Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 18.Google Scholar
Sigur°čsson, H. 1989. Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic in a Comparative GB Approach. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Scandinavian Languages, University of Lund.Google Scholar
Thráinsson., H. 1986. On Auxiliaries, AUX and VPs in Icelandic. In Hellan, L. & Christensen, K. K. (eds.), Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 235–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaenen, A., Maling, J. & Thráinsson, H. 1985. Case and Grammatical Functions: The Icelandic Passive. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3, 441–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar