Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T07:21:19.119Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SWETWOL: A Comprehensive Morphological Analyser for Swedish

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Fred Karlsson
Affiliation:
Fred Karlsson, Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Hallituskatu 11, SF-00100 Helsinki, Finland.
Get access

Abstract

SWETWOL is implemented in the framework of Koskenniemi's (1983) two-level model. It contains a 48,000 item lexicon and a full inflectional description. Special attention was paid to the design of a computational analysis of productive Swedish compounds. Recall (coverage) and precision of SWETWOL meet high standards. SWETWOL has been extensively tested on various types of texts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Allén, S. 1970. Nusvensk frekvensordbok baserad på tidningstext. 1. Graford, Homografkomponenter. Data Linguistica 1. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Allén, S. 1972. 10000 i topp. Ordfrekvenser i tidningstext. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell Forlag AB.Google Scholar
Allén, S., Eeg-Olofsson, M., Gavare, R. & Sjögreen, C. 1981. Svensk baklängesordbok. Nacka: Esselte studium.Google Scholar
Berg, S. 1978. Olika lika ord. Svenskt homograflexikon. Data Linguistica 12. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Blåberg, O. 1984. Svensk böjningsmorfologi: en tvånivåbeskrivning. Master's Thesis, Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Blåberg, O. 1988. A Study of Swedish Compounds. Department of General Linguistics, University of Umeå, Report no. 29.Google Scholar
Borin, L. 1986. ‘Swedish two-level morphology: Some remarks’. UCDL-R-86-l, Uppsala University, Center for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Brodda, B. 1983. An Experiment with Heuristic Parsing of Swedish. In Proceedings of the First Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL. Pisa, pp. 6673.Google Scholar
Collinder, B. & Svenblad, R. 1987. Förkortningsordbok. Andra utökade upplagan. Kristianstad: Liber.Google Scholar
Eeg-Olofsson, M. 1988. A Morphological Prolog System for Swedish Based on Analogies. In Dahl, ö. and Fraurud, K. (eds.) Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Text Comprehension in Man and Machine. Stockholm: Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm, pp. 4962.Google Scholar
Einarsson, J. 1978. Talad och skriven svenska. Lundastudier i nordisk språkvetenskap, Serie C No. 9. Lund: Walter Ekstrand Bokförlag.Google Scholar
Ejerhed, E. 1988. Finding Clauses in Unrestricted Text by Finitary and Stochastic Methods. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing. Austin, Texas: ACL, pp. 219227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ejerhed, E. 1990. A Swedish Clause Grammar. In Papers from the Seventh Scandinavian Conference on Computational Linguistics, Pind, J. & Rögnvaldsson, E. (eds.) Institute of Lexicography and Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, pp. 1425.Google Scholar
Ejerhed, E. & Bromley, H. 1986. A Self-extending Lexicon: Description of a Word Learning Program. In Karlsson, F. (ed.) Papers from the Fifth Scandinavian Conference on Computational Linguistics. Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Publications no. 15, pp. 5972.Google Scholar
Ejerhed, E. and Wennstedt, O. 1989. Preliminärt förslag till märkning av ord i Stockhom – Umeå corpus. Ms, Department of Linguistics, University of Umeå.Google Scholar
Från rondell till gräddfil. Nya ord i svenskan från 40-tal til 80-tal. Svenska språknämnden. Stockholm: Esselte studium. 1989.Google Scholar
Gellerstam, M. 1987. Svenska Akademiens ordlista – elfte upplagan. Språkvård 2, 613.Google Scholar
Gellerstam, M. 1988. Verb Syntax in a Dictionary for Second-Language Learning. In Studies in Computer-Aided Lexicology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, pp. 103122.Google Scholar
Hellberg, S. 1978. The Morphology of Present-Day Swedish, Word-Inflection, Word- Formation, Basic Dictionary. Data Linguistica 13. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International.Google Scholar
Järborg, J. 1988. Towards a Formalized Lexicon of Swedish. In Studies in Computer-Aided Lexicology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, pp. 140158.Google Scholar
Källgren, ,\ Gunnel, 1984a. HP: A Heuristic Parser for Swedish. In Sgvall, A. (ed.) De nordiska datalingvistikdagarna 1983. Uppsala universitet, pp. 155162.Google Scholar
Källgren, , Gunnel, 1984b. Automatisk excerpering av substantiv ur lŌpande text. Ett möjligt hjälpmedel vid datoriserad indexering? IRI-rapport 1984:1, Institutet för Rāttsinformatik, Stockholms Universitet.Google Scholar
Källgren, , Gunnel, 1988. What good is Syntactic Information in the Lexicon of a Syntactic Parser? Nordiske Datalingvistikdage og Symposium for datamatstøttet leksikografi of terminologi, Proceedings, LAMBDA No. 7, Institut for Datalingvistik, Handelshøjskolen i København, pp. 112.Google Scholar
Källgren, , Gunnel, 1990a. Parsing without Lexicon: the MorP System. Ms, Department of Computational Linguistics, University of Stockholm.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Källgren, , Gunnel, 1990b. Making Maximal Use of Surface Criteria in Large-scale Parsing: the MorP Parser. Ms, Department of Computational Linguistics, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
[Karlsson, F. 1989. Parsing and Constraint Grammar. Unpublished paper, Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki.]Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. 1990. Constraint Grammar as a Framework for Parsing Running Text. In Karlgren, H. (ed.) Papers presented to the 13th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, Helsinki, vol. 3, pp. 168173.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. 1992a. Considerations for the Design of a General-Purpose Parser. In Karlsson, , Voutilainen, , Heikkilä, , and Anttila, (1992, ed.).Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. 1992b. User's Manual for the Constraint Grammar Parser CGP. In Karlsson, Voutilainen, Heikkilä, and Anttila (1992, ed.).Google Scholar
Karlsson, F. (in preparation) Constraint Grammar for Parsing Swedish text. Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F., Voutilainen, A., Heikkilä, J. & Anttila, A. 1991. Constraint Grammar: A Language-independent System for Parsing Unrestricted Text, with an Application to English. In Workshop Notes from the Ninth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-91), Natural Language Text Retrieval, Anaheim, California.Google Scholar
Karlsson, F., Voutilainen, A., Heikkilä, J. & Anttila, A. 1992 (eds.) Constraint Grammar: A Language-Independent Parsing Formalism. In preparation.Google Scholar
Karttunen, L., Koskenniemi, K. & Kaplan, R. M. 1987. A Compiler for Two-level Phonological Rules. In Dalrymple, M., Kaplan, R. M., Karttunen, L., Koskenniemi, K., Shaio, S., and Wescoat, M. (eds.) Tools for Morphological Analysis. Report no. CSLI–87–108, Center for the Study of Language and Information, pp. 161.Google Scholar
Koskenniemi, K. 1983.Two-level Morphology: A General Computational Model for Word-form Recognitionand Production. Publications of the Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki, no. 11.Google Scholar
Magnuson, T., Grandström, B., Carlson, R. & Karlsson, F. 1990. Phonetic Transcription of a Swedish Morphological Analyzer. PHONUM, Report from the Department of Phonetics, University of Umeå, 1, pp. 5861.Google Scholar
Malmgren, S.-G. 1988.On Regular Polysemy in Swedish. In Studies in Computer-Aided Lexicology, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, pp. 179200.Google Scholar
Modéer, , Ivar, 1989. Svenska personnamn. Anthroponymica Suecana 5. Lund: Studentlitteratur.Google Scholar
Nyord i svenskan fràn 40-tal till 80-tal. Svenska språknämnden. Stockholm: Esselte studium, 1986.Google Scholar
Rankin, I. 1986. SMORF – An Implementation of Hellberg's Morphology System. In Karlsson, F. (ed.) Papers from the Fifth Scandinavian Conference on Computational Linguistics, Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki, Publications no. 15, pp. 161172.Google Scholar
Rankin, I. n.d. SMORF User's Guide (mimeo), Department of Computer and Information Science, Linköping University.SAOL. See Svenska Akademiens Ordlista över svenska språket.Google Scholar
Sigurd, B. 1986. Ordboken, ordlistan och några andra av Svenska Akademiens språkliga insatser under 1900-talet. In Allén, S., Loman, B., and Sigurd, B. (eds.). Svenska Akademien och svenska språket, Stockholm: Norstedts, pp. 145231.Google Scholar
Sigurd, B. — Particle verbs and their treatment in the MT-system SWETRA. Ms, Department of Linguistics, Lund University.Google Scholar
Sjögreen, C. 1988. Creating a Dictionary from a Lexical Database. In Studies in Computer- Aided Lexicology, Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, pp. 299338.SOB. See Svensk ordbok.Google Scholar
Svensk ordbok. Stockholm: Esselte Studium, 1986.Google Scholar
Svenska Akademiens ordlista över svenska språket. 11. upplagan. Stockholm: Norstedts förlag 1986.Google Scholar
Svenska ortnamn — uttal och stavning. Utgiven av Lantmäteriverket och Svenska språknåmnden. Stockholm: Norstedts, 1991.Google Scholar
Sågvall, Hein A. 1983. A Parser for Swedish. Status Report for Sve. Ucp. 02 1983. UCDL–R–83–2. Center for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Sågvall, Hein A. 1987. Parsing by means of Uppsala Chart Processor (UCP). In Bole, L. (ed.) Natural Language Parsing Systems, Berlin & Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Sågvall, Hein A. 1988. Towards a Comprehensive Swedish Parsing Dictionary. In Studies in Computer-Aided Lexicology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell International, pp. 268298.Google Scholar
Såvall, Hein A. 1990. Lemmatising the Definitions of Svensk Ordbok by Morphological and Syntactic Analysis. A Pilot Study. In Pind, J. and Rögnvaldsson, E. (eds.) Papers from the Seventh Scandinavian Conference on Computational Linguistics. Institute of Lexicography and Institute of Linguistics, University of Iceland, pp. 342357.Google Scholar
Sågvall, Hein A. & Ahrenberg, L. 1985. A Parser for Swedish. Status Report for SVE. UCP. 06 1985. UCDL–R–85–yy2. Center for Computational Linguistics, Uppsala University.Google Scholar
Sågvall, Hein A. & Sjögreen, C. (in print) Ett svenskt stamlexikon för datamaskinell analys. En översikt. in Svenskans beskrivning, 18.Google Scholar
Thelander, K. 1986. Politikerspråk i könsperspektiv. Ord ochstil. Språkvårdssamfundets skrifter 17. Stockholm: Liber.Google Scholar
Thorell, O. 1984. Att bilda ord. Stockholm:Skriptor.Google Scholar
Thorell, O. 1987. Svensk grammatik. Andra upplagan. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar
Voutilainen, A. 1991. Lexical Disambiguation. In Karlsson, F. et al. (eds.) Natural Language Processing for Information Retrieval Purposes, SIMPR Document No. SIMPR-RUCL–1990–13. 4e. Department of General Linguistics, University of Helsinki (in preparation).Google Scholar