Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:25:13.695Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subject Clitics and Ā-Bound Traces*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Kirsti Koch Christensen
Kirsti Koch Christensen
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo, Lingvistisk institutt, PO Box 1012, Blindern, 0315 Oslo 3, Norway
Get access

Abstract

This paper presents a syntactic account of the distribution of subject clitics in the Oslo dialect of Norwegian. In addition to providing a unified explanation for some seemingly unrelated facts about subject clitics, this account will be shown to have implications for the proper definition of the notions ‘variable’ and ‘anaphor’.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 8 , Issue 1 , June 1985 , pp. 1 - 23
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Besten, H. den 1981. On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules. In Abrahams, W. (ed.) On the Formal Syntax of West-Germania. Benjamins: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Bleken, B. 1970. Om setningsskjemaet. Universitetsforlaget: Oslo.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Diderichsen, P. 1962. Elementœr dansk grammatik. Gyldendal: Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Holmberg, A. 1983. The finite sentence in English and Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 3.Google Scholar
Hooper, J.B. & Thompson, S.A. 1973. On the Applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 465–497.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.S. 1982a. Complex Inversion Chains in French. Wiener Linguistische Gazette 27/28, 39:69.Google Scholar
Kayne, R.S. 1982b. Predicates and Arguments, Verbs and Nouns. Paper read at the 1982 GLOW colloquium, Paris.Google Scholar
Koster, J. 1978. Locality Principles in Syntax. Foris: Dordrecht.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papazian, E. 1978 Hu sa at aldri hadde a sett henner så sinna. Norskrift 19, 54–78.Google Scholar
Platzack, C. In press. COMP, INFL, and Germanic word Order. In Hellman, L. & Christensen, K.K. (eds.) Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Reidel: Dordrecht.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K.T. 1980. A Case Conflict in Norwegian Topicalization. NELS XI, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K.T. 1983. Parametric Variation in Phrase Structure: A Case Study. Unpubl. doctoral dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Taraldsen, K.T. In press. Som and the Binding Theory. In Hellan, L. & Christensen, K.K. (eds.) Topics in Scandinavian Syntax. Reidel: Dordrecht.Google Scholar