Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T06:18:37.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On Agrammatism and Telegram Style: An Exemplifying Discussion of Swedish Data

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Elisabeth Ahlsén
Elisabeth Ahlsén
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, University of Gäteborg, S-41298 Gäteborg, Sweden
Get access

Extract

The characterization of agrammatic speech as telegram style is discussed in relation to an exemplifying comparison of linguistic structures and determining activity factors in a Swedish database of agrammatic speech and simulated telegrams. The strong claim that telegram style is a specific register that is also used by agrammatic aphasics does not find support in the data. Features of agrammatic speech that can be in line with a more vague and metaphorical use of the term telegram style are pointed out.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 16 , Special Issue 2: Special issue on NEUROLINGUISTICS , December 1993 , pp. 137 - 152
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahlsén, E. 1986. Possibilities of Spontaneous Compensation for Aphasic Symptoms in Conversation. In Nilsson, L. G. & Hjelmquist, E. (eds.), Communication and Handicap – Aspects of Psychological Compensation and Technical Aids. Amsterdam: North- Holland, pp. 215–232.Google Scholar
Ahlsén, E. 1993. Communicative Activity Analysis of Aphasia. Forthcoming in Heltoft, L. (ed.), Papers from the 13th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Roskilde University Centre.Google Scholar
Ahisén, E. & Dravins, C. 1990. Agrammatism in Swedish: Two Case Studies. In Menn, L. & Obler, L. (eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross Language Narrative Sourcebook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 545–622.Google Scholar
Aliwood, J. 1984. On Relevance in Spoken Interaction. In Kjellmer, G. & Bäckman, S. (eds.), Papers on Language and Literature, Gothenburg Studies in English 60, University of Göteborg, Department of English.Google Scholar
Aliwood, J., Nivre, J. & Ahlsén, E. 1990. Speech Management: On the Nonwritten Life of Speech. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 13, 3–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allwood, J., Niver, J. & Ahlsén, E. 1972. On the Semantics and Pragmatics of Linguistic Feedback. Journal of Semantics 9, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Déjéring, J. 1914. Sémiologie des affections du systéme nerveux. Paris: Masson.Google Scholar
Goodglass, H.& Kaplan, E. 1972. The Assessment of Aphasia and Related Disorders. Philadelphia:Lea & Febiger.Google Scholar
Heaschen, C. & Kolk, H. 1988. Adaptation bei aphatischen Stärungen. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 69, 41–53.Google Scholar
Isserlin, M. 1922. Über Agrammatismus. Zetitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychinartri 75, 332–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1964. Towards a Lingustic Topology of Aphasic Impairments. In Disorders of Language: A CIBA Foundation Symposium. pp. 21–47. London.Google Scholar
Kolk, H.. 1987. A Theory of Grammatical Impairment in Aphasia. InG., Kempen (ed.), Natural Language Generation: New Results in Arificial Intelligence, Psychology and Linguistics. Dordrecht: Nijhoff, pp. 377–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolk, H., Van, Grunsven M. & Keyser, A. 1985. On Parallelism between Production and Comprehension in Agrammatism. In M.-L., Kean (ed.), Agrammatism. Orlando: Academic Press, pp. 165–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolk, H., Heling, G. & Keyser, A. 1990. Agrammatism in Dutch: Two Case Studies. In Menn, L. & Obler, L.K. (eds.), Aagrammatic Aphasia: A Cross Language Narrative Sourcebook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 179–280.Google Scholar
Linell, P. 1982. The Written Language Bias in Linguistics. Studies in Communication 2. University of Linköping, Department of Communication Studies, pp. 71–102.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. 1976. Basic Problems in Neurolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menn, L. & Obler, L. K. (eds.) 1990. Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross Language Narrative Sourcebook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Nespoulous, J.-L. 1973. Approche linguistique de divers phénoménes d'agrammatisme:Étude comparative: Application aux méthodes de diagnostique et de rééducation dulangage. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail.Google Scholar
Niemi, J., Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P. & Tesak, J. 1993. Telegraphese and Agrammatism in Finnish and German. Forthcoming in Heltoft, L. (ed.), Papres from the 13th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics. Roskilde University Centre.Google Scholar
Stark, J. & Dresser, W. 1990. Agrammtism in German: Two Case Studies. In Menn, L. &Obler, L. K. (eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross Language Narrative Sourcebook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, pp. 281–442.Google Scholar
Tesak, J. 1992a. Factors Influencing Surface Manifestation of Agrammatism. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 7, 91–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesak, J. 1992b. Telegraphese: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. In Proceedings of the XVIth International Congress of Linguists, Quebec City.Google Scholar
Tesak, J.& Dittman, J. 1991. Telegraphic Style in Normals and Aphasics. Linguistics, 29, 1111–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tissot, R., Mounin, G. & Lhermitte, F. 1973. L'Agrammatisme. Brussels: Dessart.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, L. S. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Combridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar