Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T14:31:50.776Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Expressions of Distance and Theory of Theta-roles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Kjell-Åke Gunnarson
Kjell-Åke Gunnarson
Affiliation:
Institut d'études romanes, University of Lund, Sölvegatan 7, S-22362 Lund, Sweden
Get access

Abstract

Expressions of distance, like far (away) from the village and 10km from the village, display various syntactic structures. On the basis of Swedish and French data, it is shown that, when such structures appear as locative predicates, certain properties of their heads become problematic, given the requirements of the GB theory of theta-roles. In order to solve these problems, two essential proposals are made: (a) An external θ-role may be used up in the process of establishing a position by means of a path. (b) The subject argument of NP-(copula)-XP may receive an external θ-role of non-lexical origin. Addressing questions of a contrastive nature, the present paper suggests that directive prepositions may assign an external θ-role in Germanic but not in Romance languages.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , June 1993 , pp. 3 - 32
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Beukema, , Frits, & Teun, Hoekstra 1984. Extractions from with-constructions. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 689–698.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, , Manfred, 1988. On the Grammar of Local Prepositions. In Bierwisch, M., Motsch, W. & I., Zimmermann (eds.), Syntax, Semantik und Lexikon, Studia Grammatica XXIX. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, pp. 1–65.Google Scholar
Chomsky, , Noam, 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Chomsky, , Noam, 1986. Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Cinque, , Giuglielmo, 1990. Ergative Adjectives and the Lexicalist Hypothesis. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory 8, 1–39.Google Scholar
Emonds, , Joseph, 1972. Evidence that Indirect Object Movement is a Structure-preserving Rule. Foundations of Language 8, 546–561.Google Scholar
Emonds, , Joseph, 1985. A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, , Joseph, 1987. The Invisible Category Principle. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 613–632.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, , Jane, 1986. Nouns, Arguments and Adjuncts. Unpublished ms., Brandeis University.Google Scholar
Gruber, , Jeffrey, 1976. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
Gunnarson, , Kjell-Åke, 1986a. Predicative Structures and Projections of Lexical Dependencies. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 13–47.Google Scholar
Gunnarson, , Kjell-Åke, 1986b. Loin de X, près de X et parallèlement à X: syntagmes prépositionnels, adjectivaux ou adverbiaux?. Le Francais Moderne 54, 1–23.Google Scholar
Gunnarson, , Kjell-Åke, 1987. Expressions spatiales comme prédicats, modifleurs et arguments. Studia Linguistica 41, 1–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunnarson, , Kjell-Åke, 1988. Expressions of Distance, Prepositions and Theory of Thetaroles. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 41.Google Scholar
Gunnarson, , Kjell-Åke, 1989. Expressions of Distance and Raising. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Higginbotham, , James, 1985. On Semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593.Google Scholar
Higgins, , Francis, Roger 1973. The Pseudo-cleft Construction in English, Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, , Ray, 1973. The Base Rules for Prepositional Phrases. In Stephen, Anderson & Paul, Kiparsky (eds.). A Festschrift for Morris Halle. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston, pp. 345–356.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, , Ray, 1977. X Syntax: A Study of Phrase Structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, , Ray, 1978. Grammar as Evidence for Conceptual Structure. In Halle, , Bresnan, & Miller, (eds.), Linguistic Theory and Psychological Reality. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, pp. 201–228.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, , Ray, , 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jespersen, , Otto, 1924. The Philosophy of Grammar. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Kayne, , Richard, 1984. Connectedness and Binary Branching. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, , Richard, 1985. Principles of Particle Constructions. In Jacqueline, Guéron, HansGeorg, Obenauer & Jean-Yves, Pollock (eds.). Grammatical representation. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 101–140.Google Scholar
Larson, , Richard, 1985. Bare-NP Adverbs. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 595–621.Google Scholar
Lasnik, , Howard, & Mamoru, Saito 1984. On the Nature of Proper Government. Linguistic Inquiry 15, 235–290.Google Scholar
Lyons, , John, 1978. Semantics, vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maling, , Joan, 1983. Transitive Adjectives: A Case of Categorial Reanalysis. In Frank, Heny & Barry, Richards (eds.). Linguistic categories: Auxiliaries and Related Puzzles I. Dordrecht: Reidel, pp. 253–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muysken, , Pieter, & Henk, van Riemsedijk 1986. Projecting Features and Featuring Projections. In Pieter, Muysken & Henk, van Riemsdijk (eds.). Features and Projections. Dordrecht: Foris, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Napoli, , Donna, Jo 1989. Predication Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riemsdijk, , Henk, van 1978. A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness: The Binding Nature of Prepositional Phrases. Dordecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Rizzi, , Luigi, 1986. Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of Pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 501–557.Google Scholar
Roberts, , Ian, 1987. On Valency Affecting Rules, Unpublished ms., University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Rothstein, , Susan, 1983. The Syntactic Forms of Predication. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
SAOB: Ordbok över svenska språket, utgiven av Svenska Akademien, (Dictionary of Swedish Academy), 1898.Google Scholar
Vergnaud, , Jean-Roger, 1985. Dêpendances et niveaux de représentation en syntaxe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, , Edwin, 1981. Argument Structure and Morphology. The Linguistic Review 1, 81–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zubizarreta, , Maria-Luisa, 1985. The Relation between Morphophonology and Morphosyntax: The Case of Romance Causatives. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 247–289.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, , Maria-Luisa, 1987. Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar