Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T03:03:52.089Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ekkehard König: The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective. In The series: Theoretical Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge. 1991. 190 pp. + Notes and Indexes.

Review products

Ekkehard König: The Meaning of Focus Particles. A Comparative Perspective. In The series: Theoretical Linguistics. London and New York: Routledge. 1991. 190 pp. + Notes and Indexes.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Kjell Johan Sæbø
Kjell Johan Sæbø
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Oslo, Germanistisk institutt, Postboks 1004 Blindern, N-0315 Oslo, Norway
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 16 , Special Issue 2: Special issue on NEUROLINGUISTICS , December 1993 , pp. 179 - 189
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atlas, J. D. & Levinson, S. C. 1981. It-clefts, Informativeness, and Logical Form: Radical Pragmatics. In Cole, P. (ed.) Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Burton-Roberts, N. 1989. The Limits to Debate. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobs, J. 1983. Fokus und Skalen. Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, J. 1988. Fokus-Hintergrund-Gliederung und Grammatik. In Altmann, H. (ed.) Intonationsforschungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Kay, P. 1990. Even. In Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 59–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
König, E. 1977. Temporal and Non-temporal Uses of Noch and Schon. In Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 173–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hönig, E. 1981. The Meaning of Scalar Particles in German. In Eikmeyer, H.-J. & Rirser, H. (eds.), Words, and Worlds, and Contexts. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Levinson, S. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Löbner, S. 1987. Quantification as a Major Module of Natural Language Semantics. In Groenendijk, J. & Stokhof, M. (eds.), Studies in DRT and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Löbner, S. 1989. schon - erst - noch. An integrated analysis. In Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 167–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plank, F. 1979. Zur Affinität von selbst und auch. In Weydt, H. (ed.) Die Partikels der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Rooth, M. 1985. Association with Focus. University of Massachusetts at Amherst diss.Google Scholar
Rooth, M. 1991. A Theory of Focus Interpretation. Forthcoming in Natural Language Semantics.Google Scholar
Seuren, P. 1985. Discourse Semantics. Blackwell: Oxford.Google Scholar