Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:26:25.616Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Brains and Languages: A Survey of Neurolinguistics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2008

Jussi Niemi ,
Matti Laine  and
Jürgen Tesak
Jussi Niemi
Affiliation:
General Linguistics, University of Joensuu, F1N-80101 Joensuu, Finland, e-mail: [email protected];
Matti Laine
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology (720), Turku University Central Hospital, FIN-20520 Turku, Finland, e-mail: [email protected];
Jürgen Tesak
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics, Wundtlaan 1, NL-6525 XD Nijmegen, The Netherlands, and School of Logopedics, Klinik Bavaria Kreischa, Dresdner Strasse 12, D-01731 Kreischa, Germany.
Get access

Abstract

Neurolinguistics, the study of language representations and processes in the human brain, is at the crossroads of fields of science such as linguistics, psychology, neuropsychology, and neurology. The present survey starts with a historical outline and continues with a review of recent studies on mental lexicon and syntax in aphasia. Those studies support the psychological reality of certain linguistic distinctions. We finish by mentioning some future trends in neurolinguistics.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 16 , Special Issue 2: Special issue on NEUROLINGUISTICS , December 1993 , pp. 83 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ahlsén, E. & Dravins, C. 1990. Agrammatism in Swedish: Two Case Studies. In Menn, L. & Obler, L. (eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Aitchison, J. 1987. Words in the Mind. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Allport, D. & Funnell, E. 1981. Components of the Mental Lexicon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 295, 397–410.Google Scholar
Badecker, W. & Caramazza, A. 1987. The Analysis of Morphological Errors in a Case of Acquired Dyslexia. Brain and Language 32, 278–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Badecker, W. & Caramazza, A. 1989. A Lexical Distinction between Inflection and Derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 108–116.Google Scholar
Badecker, W. & Caramazza, A. 1991. Morphological Composition in the Lexical Output System. Cognitive Neuropsychology 8, 335–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, E. & Wulfeck, B. 1989. Comparative Aphasiology: A Cross-Linguistic Approach to Language Breakdown. Aphasiology 3, 111–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, R. 1991. Sentence Processing in Aphasia. In Sarno, M. (ed.), Acquired Aphasia (2nd ed.). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Blumstein, S. 1988. Neurolinguistics: An Overview of Language-Brain Relations in Aphasia. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bresnan, J. (ed.) 1982. The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Brown, A. S. 1991. A Review of the Tip-of-the-Tongue Experience. Psychological Bulletin 109, 204–223.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butterworth, B. 1983. Lexical Representation. In Butterworth, B. (ed.), Language Production, vol. 2. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Butterworth, B. & Howard, D. 1985. Paragrammatism. Cognition 26, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D. 1987. Neurolinguistics and Linguistic Aphasiology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, D. 1992. Language: Structure, Processing, and Disorders. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caplan, D. & Hildebrandt, N. 1988. Disorders of Syntactic Comprehension. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Caramazza, A. 1988. Some Aspects of Language Processing Revealed through the Analysis of Acquired Aphasia: The Lexical System. Annual Review of Neuroscience 11, 395–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, A., Laudanna, A. & Romani, C. 1988. Lexical Access and Inflectional Morphology. Cognition 28, 297–332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coltheart, M., Patterson, K. & Marshall, J. C. (eds.) 1980. Deep Dyslexia. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Dell, G. S. 1986. A Spreading-Activation Theory of Retrieval in Sentence Production. Psychological Review 93 (3), 283–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, A. & Young, A. 1988. Human Cognitive Neuropsychology. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Emmorey, K. & Fromkin, V. 1988. The Mental Lexicon. In Newmeyer, F. (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, J., Bever, T. & Garrett, M. 1974. The Psychology of Language. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Frauenfelder, U. H. & Schreuder, R. 1992. Constraining Psycholinguistic Models of Morphological Processing and Representation: The Role of Productivity. In Booij, G. & van, Marle J. (eds.) Yearbook of Morphology 1991. Dordrechet: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Friederici, A. 1982. Syntactic and Semantic Processes in Aphasic Deficits: The Availability of Prepositions. Brain and Language. 15, 249–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funnel, E. 1987. Morphological Errors in Acquired Dyslexia: A Case of Mistaken Identity. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 39A, 497–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H. 1990. Inferences from Cross-Modal Comparisons of Agrammatism. In Menn, L. & Obler, L (eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Harley, T. A. 1993. Connectionist Approaches to Language Disorders. Aphaiology. 7, 221–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heeschen, C. 1985. Agrammatism versus Parapgammatism: A Fictitious Opposition. In Kean, M.-L. (ed.), Agrammatism. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Henderson, L. 1985. Toward a Psychology of Morphemes. In Ellis, A. W. (ed.), Progress in the Psychology of Language. London: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1941. Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Uppsala universitets drskriftls, 1–83.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. 1968. Child Language, Aphasia and Phonological Universals. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Job, R.Sartori, G. 1984. Morphological Decomposition: Evidence from Crossed Phonological Dyslexia. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. 36A, 435–458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kean, M. (ed.) 1985. Agrammatism. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Kleist, K. 1914. Aphasie und Geisteskrankheit. Münchner Medizinische Wochenschrift. 61, 8–12.Google Scholar
Kolk, H., van, Grunsven M. & Keyser, A. 1985. On Parllelism between Production and Comprehension in Agrammatism. In Kean, M.-L. (ed.), Agrammatism. Orlando: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Laine, M., Juhola, M., Niemi, J. & Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P. 1992. Simulating Aphasic Naming Errors with a Discrete Stage Serial World Production Model. Poster presented at the 30th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Aphasia, Toronto, Canada, 10 25–27, 1992.Google Scholar
Laine, M., Kujala, P., Niemi, J. & Uusipaikka, E. 1992. On the Nature of Naming Difficulties in Aphasia. Cortex. 28. 537–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenneberg, E. 1967. Bioligical Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lesser, R. 1978. Linguistic Investigation of Aphaia. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., Schriefers, H.Vorberg, D., Meyer, A. S., Pechmann, T. & Havinga, J. 1991. The Time Course of Lexical Access in Specch Production: A Study of Picture Naming. Psychological Review. 98. 122–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsall, J.C. & Newcombe, F. 1973. Patterns of Paralexia: A Psycholinguistic Approach. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 2. 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, N. & Saffran, E.M. 1992. A Computational Account of Deep Dysphasia: Evidence from a Single Case Study. Brain and Language. 43, 240–274.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menn, L. 1990. Agrammatism in English: Two Case Studies. In Menn, L. & Obler, L. (eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Menn, L. & Obler, L. 1990. Cross-Language Data and Theories of Agrammatism. In Menn, L. (eds.), Agrammatic Aphagsia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourecebook, vol. 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Menn, L. & Obler, L. 1990 (eds.). Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook, vols. 1–3. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Miceli, G. & Caramzza, A. 1988. Dissociation of Inflectional and Derivational Morphology. Brain and Language. 35, 24–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miceli, G., Mazzucchi, A., Menn, L. & Goodglass, H. 1983. Contrasting Cases of Italian Agrammatic Aphasia without Comprehansion Disorder. Brain and Laungage 19, 65–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nespoulous, J-L., Dordain, M., Perron, C., Ska, B., Bub, D., Caplan, D., Mehler, J. & Lecours, A.-R. 1988. Agrammatism in Sentence Production without Comprehension Deficits: Reduced Availability of Syntactic Structurees and /or Grammatical Morphemes? A Case Study. Brain and Language. 33, 279–295.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niemi, J. 1991. Nonlexical Grmmatical Deviations in “Paragrammatic” Aphasia. Folia Linguistica. 24, 389–404.Google Scholar
Niemi, J.Laine, M., Hānninen, R. & Koivuselkä-Sallinen, P. 1990. Agrammatism in Finnish: Two Case Studies. In Menn, L. & Oblwer, L. (eds.), Agrammatic Aphasia: A Cross-Language Narrative Sourcebook. vol. 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
Scalise, S. 1984. Generative Morphology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Shallice, T. 1988. From Neuropsychology to Mental Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, A. 1991. Morphological Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Taft, M. 1988. A Morphological-Decomposition Model of Lexical Representation. Linguistics. 26: 657–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesak, J. 1990. Agrammatismus: Ergebnisse und Probleme der Forschung. Neuolingustik. 4, 85–113.Google Scholar
Tesak, J. 1992a. Everything Is the Same: A Note on Caramazza & Hillis 1989. Brain and Language. 43, 512–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesak, J. 1992b. Factors Influencing Surface Manifestations of Agrammatism. Journal of Neurolinguistics. 7, 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tesak, J. 1992c. Review of Grodzinsky's ‘Theortical Perspectives on Language Deficits’. Linguistics. 30, 975–982.Google Scholar
Tesak, J. & Hummer, P. 1993. A Note on Prepositions in Agrammatism. Brain and Language (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar