Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T16:23:17.554Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Antonio Fábregas & Michael Putman : Passives and Middles in Mainland Scandinavian. Microvariation through Exponency. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2020. Pp. 240.

Review products

Antonio Fábregas & Michael Putman : Passives and Middles in Mainland Scandinavian. Microvariation through Exponency. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter, 2020. Pp. 240.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2021

Eva Klingvall
Eva Klingvall*
Affiliation:
Centre for Languages and Literature, Lund University, Lund221 00, Sweden. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'

Keywords

term oneterm twoterm threeterm fourterm fiveterm six
Type
Book Review
Information
Nordic Journal of Linguistics , Volume 44 , Issue 3 , December 2021 , pp. 304 - 308
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Nordic Association of Linguistics

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Engdahl, Elisabet. 1999. The choice between bli-passive and s-passive in Danish, Norwegian and Swedish. NORDSEM report 3.Google Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio & Putman, Michael. 2020. Passives and Middles in Mainland Scandinavian. Microvariation through Exponency. Berlin/Boston: De Gruyter.10.1515/9783110670912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In Hale, K. & Keyser, S.J. (eds.) The View from Building 20, 111–176. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halliday, Michael A.K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English. Part 2. Journal of linguistics 3, 199–244.10.1017/S0022226700016613CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedlund, Cecilia. 1992. On participles. PhD dissertation, Dept Linguistics, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2007. On the relation between morphology and syntax. In Ramchand, G. & Reiss, C. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces, 209–238. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klingvall, Eva. 2012. Complex non-compound words in Swedish. Studia linguistica 66: 1–31.10.1111/j.1467-9582.2012.01188.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klingvall, Eva. 2007. (De)composing the middle. A minimalist approach to middles in English and Swedish. PhD dissertation, Lund University.Google Scholar
Laanemets, Anu. 2012. Passiv i moderne dans, norsk of svensk. Et korpusbaseret studie af tale- og skriftsprog . Dissertationes Philologicae Scandinavicae Universitatis Tartuensis 2. Tartu: University of Tartu Press.Google Scholar
Lekakou, Marika. 2005. In the middle, somewhat elevated. The semantics of middles and its crosslinguistic realization. PhD dissertation, UCL, University of London.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1985. Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (ed.) Language typology and syntactic description. vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon, 57–149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Teleman, Ulf, Staffan, Hellberg & Erik, Andersson. 1994. Svenska Akademiens Grammatik. Stockholm: Norstedts.Google Scholar