Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:52:22.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mahler’s Overwhelming Climaxes: The Symphony as Mass Medium

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2018

Peter Franklin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A number of Mahler’s symphonies contain climactic accumulations and releases of musical-expressive energy that overspill conventional boundaries between the aesthetic and the sensational, the spiritual and the physical, high art and the popular. These might be said to define something of the ‘problem’ that his music represented for many of his contemporaries. They are still infrequently confronted in terms of their elaborately staged excess, as if mocking the metaphorical language of harmonically contrived ‘tension and resolution’ by revealing, in spite of conventional mockery of ‘programmaticism’, what such notionally formal or ‘theoretical’ language always implies. Even Lawrence Dreyfus’s recent exploration of the ‘erotic impulse’ in Wagner’s music was to some degree hedged by symptomatic analysis of Wagner’s supposed ‘decadence’, although it valuably opened up the field and offered insight into key features of post-Wagnerian, late-romantic music. Mahler himself, in a famous letter to Gisela Tolnay-Witt, situated these in the specific, socio-cultural characteristics of symphonic music in an era of mass consumption by ever larger numbers of people in ever larger spaces. The history and changing implications of these climactic moments in Mahler’s symphonies will be sketched here with reference to their often explicitly transgressive implications.

Type
Research Article
Information
Nineteenth-Century Music Review , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , December 2018 , pp. 391 - 404
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 ‘Von hier an … bis zum Schluss ist es empfehlenswerth die Hörner so lange zu verstärken, bis der hymnenartige, alles übertönende Choral die nöthige Klangfülle erreicht hat. Alle Hornisten stehen auf, um die möglichst grösste Schallkraft zu erzielen. Mahler’s direction in the score of the Finale of the First Symphony, seven bars before cue 56. English translation by the author.

2 From Theodor Helm’s review of the Vienna premiere in November 1900 of the First Symphony, upon whose ‘parodistic’ elements he had dwelt satirically. Translation by Painter, Karen and Varwig, Bettina, from Karen Painter, ed., Mahler and His World (Princeton and Oxford: Princeton University Press, 2002), 293–294 Google Scholar [original German text not included].

3 See Taruskin, Richard, The Oxford History of Western Music, IV: Music in the Early Twentieth Century (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010 [originally 2005]), 5–6ff Google Scholar.

4 Rehding, Alexander. Music and Monumentality: Commemoration and Wonderment in Nineteenth-Century Germany (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009), 52ff CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also Wagner, Richard, Opera and Drama, trans. W. Ashton-Ellis (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1995), I, 195–196 Google Scholar.

5 Gisela Tolnay-Witt may have been the nine-year-old subsequent musicologist Gisela Selden-Goth, although Herta Blaukopf questions this assumption on grounds of Selden-Goth’s 1884 birth-date; see Blauopf, Herta, ed., Gustav Mahler Briefe, Neuausgabe (Vienna: Paul Zsolnay, 1982), 434 Google Scholar. Mahler does, however, clearly refer to her as his “little tormenting spirit”; see Selected Letters of Gustav Mahler, ed. Knud Martner (London: Faber and Faber, 1979), 149.

6 Selected Letters of Gustav Mahler, ed. Martner, 147–8.

7 Selected Letters of Gustav Mahler, ed. Martner, 148.

8 Selected Letters of Gustav Mahler, ed. Martner, 148–9.

9 I am thinking here of Wagner’s theorization of the post-Beethovenian orchestra’s ‘faculty of speech’ (‘the faculty of uttering the unspeakable’) as outlined in Wagner, Opera and Drama, III, section V, 316ff.

10 My engagement with this single essay by Kittler is rather deliberately opportunistic; for more extended consideration of Kittler, relevant to the present article, see Gundula Kreuzer, ‘Kittler’s Wagner and Beyond’ in ‘Colloquy. Discrete/Continuous: Music and Media Theory after Kittler’ in Journal of the American Musicological Society 70 (2017), 228–33.

11 Kittler, Friedrich, ‘World-Breath: On Wagner’s Media Technology’, in Opera Through Other Eyes, edited by David J. Levin (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1994), 215 Google Scholar.

12 Kittler, ‘World-Breath’, 215.

13 Kittler, ‘World-Breath’, 216.

14 Kittler, ‘World-Breath’, 216.

15 Kittler, ‘World-Breath’, 215.

16 Kittler, ‘World-Breath’, 221.

17 Kittler, ‘World-Breath’, 224.

18 Kittler, ‘World-Breath’, 233.

19 Kittler, ‘World-Breath’, 233.

20 See, for example, Graf, Max, Die Wiener Oper (Vienna: Humbolt-Verlag, 1955)Google Scholar, ‘Gustav Mahler im Kaffeehaus’, 79.

21 Painter, ed., Mahler and His World, 286.

22 For an illuminating study of this movement, see Buhler, James, ‘“Breakthrough” as Critique of Form: The Finale of Mahler’s First Symphony’ 19th-Century Music 20 (1996): 125–143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

23 I am thinking of the famous series of eight caricatures by János Jánko reproduced by Lawrence Kramer in his Musical Meaning: Toward a Critical History (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2002), 88. As originally published in a Hungarian newspaper in 1873, they were accompanied by amusing captions that may be seen in translation in Anthony Wilkinson, Liszt (London: Macmillan, 1975), 65. The fourth image is the one referred to here; its caption: ‘Pianissimo. Saint Assisi Liszt speaks to the birds. – His face brightens with holy light’.

24 Kangas, Ryan R., ‘Mahler’s Early Summer Journeys through Vienna, or What Anthropomorphized Nature Tells Us’, Journal of the American Musicological Society 68 (2015): 378 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

25 The second song supplied much of the music and implied imagery of the symphony’s first movement. See also n.27 below.

26 See Mahler, Alma, Gustav Mahler: Memories and Letters, fourth English revised edn (London: Sphere Books, 1990), 106 Google Scholar. Concerning Strauss’s criticism, see Blaukopf, Herta, ed., Gustav Mahler – Richard Strauss: Correspondence 1888–1911 (London: Faber & Faber, 1884), 37 Google Scholar.

27 In Mahler’s text for the second of the Lieder eines fahrenden Gesellen, the description of an idyllic natural world in which flowers and animals speak to the poet concludes with the lines ‘Will my happiness begin now?/ No, no, I think it can never bloom for me!’

28 Blaukopf, ed., Mahler –Strauss Correspondence, 119 (for the German text see Blaukopf, Herta (ed.), Gustav Mahler – Richard Strauss, Briefwechsel 1888–1911 (Munich: R. Piper & Co., 1980), 156)Google Scholar.

29 The translated text of this programme is reproduced in A. Mahler, Gustav Mahler, 213–14.

30 The programme for the second performance in 1893 of the First Symphony in Hamburg had the Finale titled ‘V. “Dall’ Inferno” (Allegro furioso)/ folgt als der plötzliche Ausbruch der Verzweiflung eines im Tiefsten verwundeten Herzens’ (‘follows, like the sudden despairing outburst of a heart wounded to its depths’). See Henry-Louis de La Grange, Mahler, vol. 1 (London: Victor Gollancz, 1974), 748 (translation amended).

31 A. Mahler, Gustav Mahler, 213.

32 My reasons for describing the movement as ‘doctrinally subversive’ are explored further in Franklin, Peter, Reclaiming Late-Romantic Music: Singing Devils and Distant Sounds (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014), 18–22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Johnson, Julian, Mahler’s Voices: Expression and Irony in the Songs and Symphonies (New York: Oxford University Press, 2009), 40 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

34 Schoenberg, Arnold, Style and Idea (London: Williams and Norgate Ltd., 1951), 7–36 Google Scholar; the essay, ‘Gustav Mahler’, had been written as a posthumous lecture in 1912.

35 Schoenberg, Style and Idea, 8.

36 Schoenberg, Style and Idea, 8–9.

37 On both issues see A. Mahler, Gustav Mahler, 225 and 112.

38 Schoenberg, Style and Idea, 15.

39 Knapp, Raymond, Symphonic Metamorphoses: Subjectivity and Alienation in Mahler’s Re-Cycled Songs (Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 2003), 257 Google Scholar.

40 Monahan, Seth, Mahler’s Symphonic Sonatas (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015), 260 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

41 Peattie, Thomas, Gustav Mahler’s Symphonic Landscapes (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015), 55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

42 Winters, Ben, Music, Performance and the Realities of Film: Shared Concert Experiences in Screen Fiction (New York: Routledge, 2014), 122 Google Scholar.

43 Barham, Jeremy, ‘Dismembering the Musical Voice: Mahler, Melodrama and Dracula from Stage to Screen’ in Melodramatic Voices: Understanding Music Drama, ed. Sarah Hibberd (Farnham: Ashgate, 2011), 237 Google Scholar.

44 The present author writes with specific experience of Intolerance, screened with Carl Davis’s new score at the 1989 Leeds Film Festival and Napoleon (restored by Kevin Brownlow and with a new score composed and conducted by Carl Davis with the London Philharmonic Orchestra) as screened at the Royal Festival Hall in December 2004.

45 Hefling, Stephen E., Mahler: ‘Das Lied von der Erde’ (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000), 91 Google Scholar.

46 Hefling, Mahler: ‘Das Lied von der Erde’, 72.