Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:03:03.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Teaching About Research Methodology and Its Crises

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 May 2020

Cleo H. Cherryholmes
Cleo H. Cherryholmes*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

One promise of the behavioral revolution was that metaphysical assumptions would be minimized, if not eliminated, in political research and theorizing. Nothing would be taken for granted. It is now obvious that this is not possible. Instead, the question is which metaphysical assumptions are most felicitous and persuasive in our search for knowledge about politics. This question does not have a single, uncomplicated answer. For those of us who teach research methodology, interesting and at times disillusioning developments have influenced thinking about research methodology during the last twenty years. Developments in modern logic, continental and neo- Marxist thought, philosophy of language, philosophy of science, and even literary criticism has upset previously held assumptions about behavioral political research and the nature of empirically based theory.

Type
Symposium on Philosophy and Education
Information
News for Teachers of Political Science , Volume 44 , Winter 1985 , pp. 19 - 21
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Austin, J. LPhilosophical papers. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Bernstein, Richard J., The restructuring of social and political theory. (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978).Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. and Fiske, D. W., “Convergent and discriminant validations by the multitraitmultimethod matrix,” Vol. 56, Psychological Bulletin.Google Scholar
Churchman, C. West, Prediction and optimal decision. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1964).Google Scholar
Cook, Thomas and Campbell, Donald, Quasi-experimentation: design and analysis issues for field settings. (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979)Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. and Meehl, P. E., “Construct validity in psychological tests,” Vol. 52 Psychological Bulletin, pp. 281–302.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz, The behavioral persuasion in politics. (New York: Random House, 1964).Google Scholar
Fay, Brian, Social theory and political practice. (Boston: Allen & Unwin, 1977).Google Scholar
Ihde, Don, Experimental phenomenology. (New York: Paragon Books, 1979).Google Scholar
Kaplan, Abraham, The conduct of inquiry. (San Francisco: Chandler Publishing Co., 1964).Google Scholar
Lane, Robert E., “The fear of equality,” The American Political Science Reveiw, Vol. Llll, (March, 1959), No. 1, pp. 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, Hilary, Meaning and the moral sciences. (Boston: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 1978).Google Scholar
Quine, W.V.O., From a logical point of view. (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1953).Google Scholar
Rudner, Richard, “Comment: on evolving standard views in philosophy of science,” The American Political Science Review, Vol. LXVI, (September, 1972), No. 3, pp. 827–845.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Searle, John, “How to derive an ought from an is,” Philosophical Review, Vol. 73.Google Scholar
Searle, John, “Austin on locutionary and illocutionary acts,” in Rosenberg, Jay and Travis, Charles, eds., Readings in the philosophy of language. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1971), pp. 262–275.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F., “On truth,” in Pitcher, George, ed., Truth. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1964).Google Scholar
Suppe, Frederick, ed., The structure of scientific theories. (Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1977).Google Scholar
Ulmer, Sidney, ed., Introductory readings in political behavior. (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1961).Google Scholar
van Fraassen, Bas C.,The scientific image. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar