Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-fwgfc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T23:58:53.903Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stumbling in the Dark: Facets of Sensory Perception and Robert Wilson's ‘H.G.‘ Installation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Stephen Di Benedetto
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The ways in which we receive and perceive what we taste, hear, touch, and smell all serve as potential resources for our understanding of an artistically mediated event. Though some modes of perception are more usually associated with the visual than the performing arts, the development of forms of Live Art has begun to challenge our understanding of how the conventions of theatricalizing experience can be modulated. Using methodologies drawn from a phenomenological perspective, Stephen Di Benedetto here examines the way in which Robert Wilson's installation, H.G., presented at the Clink, near London Bridge, in 1995, triggered a journey in sensory perception for its spectators, and served as an exemplar of the ways in which the full range of sensory resources can be ‘theatrically’ deployed. Stephen Di Benedetto, having received his PhD from Goldsmiths College, University of London, for his thesis on Playwriting as a Visual Art, is currently an Assistant Professor of Theatre History at the School of Theatre, University of Houston, and is now actively engaged in research on the body in contemporary Live Art and new Irish and English playwriting.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 17 , Issue 3 , August 2001 , pp. 273 - 284
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. Frueh, Joanna, Erotic Faculties (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996)Google Scholar.

2. Jenkins, Emily, Tongue First: Aventures in Physical Culture (London: Virago, 1999)Google Scholar.

3. Keidon, Lois, ‘Blood on the Tracks: the Performance Work of Franko B’, in Keidon, Lois and Margan, Stuart, Franko B: the Performance Work (London: Black Dog Publishing, 1999)Google Scholar.

4. de Olivera, Nicolas, Oxley, Nicola, and Petry, Michael, Installation Art (London: Thames and Hudson, 1996), p. 8Google Scholar.

5. Ackerman, Diane, A Natural History of the Senses (London: Phoenix, 2000), p. xvGoogle Scholar.

6. Arnheim, Rudolf, Visual Thinking (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1969), p. vGoogle Scholar.

7. Gombrich, E. H., Image and Eye: Further Studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation, (Oxford: Phaidon, 1982), p. 15Google Scholar.

8. Ibid., p. 33–4.

9. Arnheim, op cit., p. 19.

10. Ibid.

11. Ackerman, op cit., p. 95.

12. Classen, Constance, Howes, David, and Synnott, Anthony, Aroma: the Cultural History of Smell (London: Routledge, 1994), p. 3Google Scholar.

13. Ibid., p. 6.

14. Akerman, op cit., p. 177.

15. Ibid., p. 178.

16. Rozik, Eli, ‘Non-Theatrical Space as Metaphor: Some Speculations on H.G.’, in Hess-Luttich, Ernst B., Muller, Jurgen E., van Zoest, Aart, ed., Signs and Space (Tubingen: Gunter Nar Verlag, 1998)Google Scholar.

17. Michael Blass, private e-mail to the author.

18. According to Jim Williams of Bowling Green State University, ‘visual rhetoric’ is the construction of images for the purpose of persuasion as defined by the rhetorical discipline. See Foss, Sonja K., Foss, Karen, and Trapp, Robert, Contemporary Perspectives on Rhetoric (Prospect Heights, Illinois: Waveland Press, 1990), p. 333–5Google Scholar.

19. Sowers, Robert, Rethinking Forms of Visual Expression (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990)Google Scholar.

20. Goldberg, Rose Lee, ‘Space as Praxis’, in Studio International, 09–10 1975), p. 130Google Scholar.

21. Gandelmann, Clause, Reading Pictures, viewing Texts (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991), p. ixGoogle Scholar.

22. Gombrich, E. H., ‘Visual Discovery Through Art’, in Image and the Eye: Further Studies in the Psychology of Pictorial Representation (Oxford: Phaidon, 1982), p. 51Google Scholar.