Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T03:17:45.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ravishing Strides: Signs of the Peripatetic in Early Modern Performance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

David Roberts
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Actors' feet are accepted as part of their expressive equipment – but doubts are often expressed that this has always been so. The evidence of early English theatre history is adduced to suggest otherwise, while recent treatments of the peripatetic in literary studies argue that the ‘visible walk’ attains prominence only in the Romantic period. But David Roberts argues that, from the emergence of permanent theatres, walking offered a metonymy for performance which persisted throughout the seventeenth century. Cross-dressing highlighted the expressive potential of the feet, while close examination of play-texts implies evolving styles of the peripatetic in performance, and the scenic theatres of the Restoration frequently portrayed walking as a cultural activity bound up with the status of both actors and scenery in post-revolutionary London. David Roberts teaches English and Drama at University College Worcester, and has published widely on theatre and literature from 1550 to 1789. He leads an AHRB-funded project on theatre criticism.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , February 2001 , pp. 18 - 30
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. Most recently in John Heilpern's transcription of a conversation between Richardson, Ralph and Gielgud, John, ‘Knights of the Lunch Table’, in The Observer Review, 28 05 2000, p. 2Google Scholar. Michael Parkinson's re-screened interview with SirGuinness, Alec (Parkinson, BBC1,14 08 2000)Google Scholar, turned up the same idea: ‘I try to get the feet right first’, said Guinness. In his Confessions of an Actor (Weidenfeld and Nicolson, 1982), Laurence Olivier devotes a paragraph to how he coped with acting barefoot in Othello (p. 211–12).

2. Parkinson, 14 Aug. 2000.

3. Stanislavsky, Constantin, trans. Magarshack, David, Stanislavsky on the Art of the Stage (Faber, 1950), p. 155Google Scholar.

4. Harrop, John, Acting (Routledge, 1992), p. 6–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

5. Wallace, Anne D., Walking, Literature, and English Culture: the Origins and Uses of Peripatetic in the Nineteenth Century (Clarendon Press, 1993), p. 11Google Scholar.

6. Ibid., p. 61.

7. Jarvis, Robin, Romantic Writing and Pedestrian Travel (Macmillan, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8. See Jones, Nesta, ‘Towards a Study of the English Acting Tradition’, in Neio Theatre Quarterly, No. 45 (1996), p. 6–20Google Scholar.

9. Brome, Richard, Vie Antipodes, ed. Knowland, A. S., in Six Caroline Plays (Clarendon Press, 1963), II, iGoogle Scholar.

10. Shakespeare, , Troilus and Cressida, ed. Muir, Kenneth (Oxford, 1982), I, iii, 152–5CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

11. Joseph, B. L., Elizabethan Acting, 2nd ed. (Clarendon Press, 1964), p. 9Google Scholar.

12. Aston, Anthony, A Brief Supplement to Colley Cibber Esq, His Lives of the Famous Actors and Actresses (London, 1747)Google Scholar, reprinted in Cibber, An Apology for the Life of Mr Colley Cibber, ed. R. W. Lowe, 2 vols. (1889), Vol. II, p. 299. For an excellent account of Betterton's vocal and manual attributes, see Roach, Joseph, ‘The Performance’, in Fisk, Deborah Payne, ed., The Cambridge Companion to English Restoration Theatre (Cambridge, 2000), p. 27–9Google Scholar.

13. See Cibber, op. cit., Vol. II, p. 241–4, and Victor, Benjamin, The History of the Theatres of London and Dublin from the Year 1730 to the Present Time, 2 vols. (1761), Vol. 11, p. 10–13Google Scholar.

14. Downes, John, Roscius Anglicanus, or an Historical Review of the Stage, ed. Summers, Montague (Fortune Press, 1920), p. 21Google Scholar.

15. Shakespeare, , Coriolanus, ed. Brockbank, Philip (Methuen, 1976), I, i, 154–7Google Scholar; Laqueur, Thomas, Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud (Harvard, 1990)Google Scholar.

16. Lichtenberg, Georg Christoph, from the Deutsches Museum translated in Lichtenberg's Visits to England, ed. Mare, M. L. and Quarrell, W. H. (Clarendon Press, 1938), p. 10Google Scholar. This is one of those of those passages which make one wonder about the influence of theatre criticism upon other genres. The formalist critic Shklovsky, Viktor famously said that Sterne's Tristram Shandy (1759–1767)Google Scholar, with its slow-motion descriptions of the body in action, was ‘the most typical novel in world literature’; in fact this ‘defamiliarizing’ technique is strongly naturalized in theatre criticism at least after the rise of Garrick for Shklovsky, see Lemon, Lee T. and Reis, Marion J., ed. and trans., Russian Formalist Criticism: Four Essays (University of Nebraska Press, 1965), p. 57Google Scholar.

17. Cumberland, Richard, Memoirs (1806), p. 60Google Scholar.

18. See Bradbrook, M. C., The Rise of the Common Player (Chatto and Windus, 1962), p. 33–6Google Scholar.

19. Ibid., p. 202–5. There is an excellent discussion of the grey areas here in Gurr, Andrew, The Shakespearean Stage 1574–1642 (Cambridge, 1992), p. 80–4Google Scholar.

20. Wright, Thomas, The Passions of the Mind in General (1604)Google Scholar, quoted in White, Martin, Renaissance Drama in Action (Routledge, 1998), p. 77Google Scholar.

21. Nashe, Thomas, The Wonderfulle Yeare (1603), DlrGoogle Scholar.

22. Gosson, Stephen, Plays Confuted in Five Actions (1582), G7vGoogle Scholar.

23. Ibid., p. 305.

24. See Mullan, John, Sentiment and Sociability: the Language of Feeling in the Eighteenth Century (Clarendon Press, 1988)Google Scholar.

25. On Bracegirdle's reputation, see Howe, Elizabeth, The First English Actresses (Cambridge, 1992)Google Scholar, and Holland, Peter, The Ornament of Action (Cambridge, 1979)Google Scholar.

26. See, amid an extensive literature, Slater, Ann Pasternak, Shakespeare the Director (Harvester, 1982)Google Scholar; Bevington, David, Action is Eloquence: Shakespeare's Language of Gesture (Harvard, 1985)Google Scholar; Dessen, Alan C., Elizabethan Drama and the Viewer's Eye (Ohio, 1977)Google Scholar; Gurr, Andrew, ‘Elizabethan Action’, in Studies in Philology, LIII (1966), p. 144–56Google Scholar; and Salomon, Brownell, ‘Visual and Aural Signs in the Performed English Renaissance Play’, in Renaissance Drama, New Series, No. 5 (1972), p. 143–69Google Scholar.

27. Gurr, Andrew, The Shakespearean Stage, p. 99–100Google Scholar.

28. Thomson, Peter, ‘The Elizabethan Actor: a Matter of Temperament’, Studies in Theatre and Performance, XX, No. 1 (2000), p. 4–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29. Shakespeare, , All's Well that Ends Well ed. Hunter, G. K. (Methuen, 1956), III, v, 72Google Scholar; Marlowe, , The First Part of Tamburlaine the Great, in Steane, J. B., ed., Christopher Marlowe: the Complete Plays (Penguin, 1969), I, ii, 193Google Scholar.

30. On Renaissance pageants and their influence on drama, see Bergeron, David M., ed., Pageantry in the Shakespearean Theater (Columbia UP, 1985)Google Scholar, and Bergeron's, earlier English Civic Pageantry, 1558–1642 (Columbia, 1971)Google Scholar.

31. Shakespeare, , Measure for Measure, ed. Lever, J. W. (Methuen, 1965), V, i, 18Google Scholar.

32. Shakespeare, , Hamlet, ed. Jenkins, Harold (Methuen, 1982), V, ii, 170Google Scholar. For Milton, see ‘Samson Agonistes’, 1–5; Sonnet XVI (‘When I consider … ’); ‘A Masque Presented at Ludlow Castle’, 178–180; in Carey, John, ed., Milton. Complete Shorter Poems (Longman, 1981)Google Scholar; also the closing lines of Paradise Lost, ed. Fowler, Alastair (Longman, 1968), XII, 648–9Google Scholar. For Bunyan, , The Pilgrim's Progress, ed. Keeble, N. H. (Oxford, 1984), p. 9Google Scholar.

33. Thomson, op. cit., p. 10.

34. Brooke, Nicholas, Introduction to his edition of Macbeth (Oxford, 1990), p. 24, 28, 32Google Scholar.

35. Righter, Anne, Shakespeare and the Idea of the Play (Penguin, 1967)Google Scholar.

36. Thomson, op. cit., p. 8.

37. Shakespeare, , King Lear, ed. Muir, Kenneth (Methuen, 1952), IV, i, 54–5Google Scholar.

38. Worthen, W. B., Shakespeare and the Authority of Performance (Cambridge, 1997), p. 127CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

39. Ibid., p. 164.

40. Ibid., p. 156–61; also Styan, J. L., The Shakespeare Revolution: Criticism and Performance in the Twentieth Century (Cambridge, 1977)Google Scholar.

41. Marsden, Jean I., ‘Rape, Voyeurism, and the Restoration Stage’, in Quinsey, Katherine M., ed., Broken Boundaries: Women and Feminism in Restoration Drama (University Press of Kentucky, 1996), p. 186Google Scholar. Marsden's view is qualified by Deborah C. Payne, ‘Reified Object or Emergent Professional? Retheorizing the Restoration Actress’, in Payne, and Canfield, , eds., Cultural Readings of Restoration and Eighteenth-Century English Theater (University of Georgia Press, 1995), p. 13–38Google Scholar.

42. See, among others, Etherege, , She Wou'd if she Cou'd (1668), II, i, and IV, iiGoogle Scholar, and The Man of Mode (1676), III, iii; Granville, The She-Gallants (1695), II, i; D'Urfey, , The Fool Turn'd Critick (1676), IGoogle Scholar, i, II, i, III, i, V, i, V, iii; Behn, , The Town-Fop (1676), IIIGoogle Scholar; Congreve, , The Way of the World (1700), IIGoogle Scholar. Some Restoration comedies, including Sedley's, CharlesThe Mulberry Garden (1668)Google Scholar and Dover's, JohnThe Mall (1674)Google Scholar, take their titles from such locales.

43. Jones, Emrys, ‘The First West End Comedy’, Proceedings of the British Academy, LVIII (1982), p. 215–58Google Scholar.

44. Etherege, George, The Man of Mode, in The Plays of Sir George Etherege, ed. Cordner, Michael (Cambridge, 1982), III, iii, 167–8Google Scholar.

45. Congreve, William, The Way of the World, in The Comedies of William Congreve, ed. Henderson, Anthony G. (Cambridge, 1982), II, 276–7Google Scholar.

46. See Gaskill, William, A Sense of Direction (Faber, 1988)Google Scholar.

47. The Diary of Samuel Pepys, ed. Latham, Robert and Matthews, William (Bell and Hyman, 1983), Vol. XI, p. 250Google Scholar.

48. See, for example, Diary IV, p. 229, 252, VII, p. 39, 61, Vm, p. 67, and IX, p. 319.

49. See Boulton, Jeremy, ‘Theatrical Cultures in Early Modern London’, Urban History, XXVII, No. 1 (2000), p. 89–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

50. Nicoll, Allardyce, A History of Restoration Drama (Cambridge, 1923), p. 43Google Scholar.

51. Mullaney, Steven, The Place of the Stage (Chicago, 1987)Google Scholar.

52. The classic account of this shift is Stone's, Lawrence ‘The Residential Development of the West End of London in the Seventeenth Century’, in Malament, Barbara C., ed., After the Reformation (Manchester, 1980), p. 167–212Google Scholar. See also Power, M. J., ‘The Social Topography of Restoration London’, in Beier, A. L. and Finlay, Roger, ed., London 1500–1700: the Making of the Metropolis (Longman, 1986), p. 199–223Google Scholar.

53. For further information on this, see The London Encyclopaedia, ed. Weinreb, Ben and Hibbert, Christopher, 2nd ed. (Macmillan, 1993), p. 738–9Google Scholar.

54. Thomas, Keith, Man and the Natural World: Changing Attitudes in England, 1500–1800 (Penguin, 1984), p. 209Google Scholar.

55. See Waller's, Edmund poem, ‘On St James's Park, as Lately Improv'd by His Majesty’, in The Poetical Works of Edmund Waller, ed. Park, Thomas, 2 vols. (1806), i, 87–91Google Scholar: ‘Here a well-polished Mall gives us the joy / To see our Prince his matchless force employ … Here, free from court compliances, he walks …’.

56. See Porter, Stephen, ed., London and the English Civil War (Macmillan, 1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lindley, Keith, Popular Politics and Religion in Civil War London (Scolar Press, 1997)Google Scholar. For a theoretical account of the urban park as expression of a royal ethos, see Mumford, Lewis, The City in History (Harcourt Brace, 1961), p. 379 ffGoogle Scholar.

57. As early as 1655 Pepys worked for his cousin Admiral Edward Montagu, who was close to Cromwell himself.

58. For an account of royalists, waverers, traitors, and parliamentarians in the theatrical profession up to 1660, see Hotson, Leslie, The Commonwealth and Restoration Stage (Harvard, 1928), p. 3–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For an example of how the relations of restored court and stage could go wrong, see the controversy over Howard's, EdwardThe Change of Crowns (1667), as documented in Pepys, VIII, 167–8, 172–3Google Scholar.

59. See Peter Holland, Elizabeth Howe, op. cit.

60. Williams, Raymond, The Country and the City (Hogarth Press, 1985), p. 235Google Scholar.

61. Benjamin, Walter, trans. Zohn, H., Charles Baudelaire: a Lyric Poet in the Era of High Capitalism (New Left Books, 1973)Google Scholar.

62. Kuppers, Petra, ‘Moving in the Cityscape: Performance and the Embodied Experience of the Flâneur’, Neiu Theatre Quarterly, No. 60 (1999), p. 314Google Scholar.

63. See McRae, Andrew, ‘“On the Famous Voyage”: Ben Jonson and Civic Space’, in Early Modern Literary Studies, Special Issue, 3 (09, 1998), 8.1–31, available at htrp://purl.oclc.org/emls/04-2/mcraonth.htmGoogle Scholar.