No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2009
In this article Susan Oommen looks at the plays of the popular Indian dramatist Mahesh Dattani as conversations between the writer and his audience on models of reality, and interprets their performance as moments in subjectivization. In initiating an audience into redefining identity, she argues that Dattani provides the parameters within which problematizations may be reviewed and better understood. He also seeks to queer the debate on Indian middle-class morality, thereby challenging its privileged status and underscoring the interconnection between repression and invisibility. The question for the audience is whether Dattani's plays can cue them into experiences of resistance and encourage them to reinvent narratives that may then function as personal histories. One of the plays on which this article focuses, Dance Like a Man, was seen during this year's Edinburgh Festival as part of the Celebration of Indian Contemporary Performing Arts. Susan Oommen works in the English Department in Stella Maris College, India, where she has been on the faculty since 1975. She spent the past academic year at the Institute for Research on Women at Rutgers University.
1. Dattani, Mahesh, Collected Plays (New Delhi: Penguin, 2000), p. xi–xiiGoogle Scholar. All citations from Dattani are from this edition.
2. Melucci, Alberto, Nomads of the Present: Social Movements and Individual Needs in Contemporary Society (Philadelphia: Temple University, 1989), p. 129Google Scholar. Melucci locates absence of reciprocal identity – ‘I recognize myself and I am recognized/I recognize myself and I recognize the other’ – as a consequence of breakdown in interaction, caused by suffering such as marginality or stigmatization.
3. Butler, Judith, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1999), p. 24Google Scholar.
4. Foucault, Michel, The Use of Pleasure, trans. Hurley, Robert (New York: Vintage, 1990), p. 4Google Scholar.
5. Breaking the Silence: Human Rights Violations Based on Sexual Orientation (New York: Amnesty International, 1994), p. 38. Article 377 of the Indian Constitution criminalizes sexual behaviour between consenting adults of the same sex.
6. In 1992 militant Hindu activists, aspiring to construct a Ram temple, wrecked the Babri Masjid in Ayodhya. Communal riots were orchestrated directly afterwards.
7. Seidman, Steven, Difference Troubles: Queering Social Theory and Sexual Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997), p. 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
8. Freire, Paulo, The Politics of Education: Culture, Power, and Liberation, trans. Macedo, Donaldo (Massachusetts: Bergin and Garvey, 1985), p. 48CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
9. Deleuze, Gilles and Guattari, Felix, What is Philosophy, trans. Tomlinson, Hugh, Burcell, Graham (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994), p. 85Google Scholar.
10. Butler, Judith, ‘Contingent Foundations: Feminism and the Question of “Postmodernism”’, in Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues, ed. Harding, Sandra (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987), p. 47Google Scholar.
11. Judith Butler, Gender Trouble, p. 175.
12. Jackson, Stevi, ‘Heterosexualiry, Power, and Pleasure’, in Feminism and Sexuality: a Reader, ed. Jackson, Stevi, Scott, Sue (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), p. 175Google Scholar.
13. Lyotard, Jean-Francois, Postmodern Fables, trans. Abbeele, Georges Van Den (Minneapolis: Minnesota University Press, 1997), p. 94Google Scholar.
14. Monette, Paul, Becoming a Man: Half a Life Story (London: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, 1992), p. 2Google Scholar.