Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:40:32.351Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Play of Eros: Paradoxes of Gender in English Pantomime

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Peter Holland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Christmas pantomime, that peculiarly English form whose uncertain origins go back to the early eighteenth century, has evolved its own distinctive typology of cross-dressed characters, with a Principal Boy who is a girl, a Dame who is indisputably male, and even those humanoid visitors from the animal kingdom known as ‘skin parts’. David Mayer explored ‘The Sexuality of English Pantomime’ in the seminal ‘People's Theatre’ issue of the original Theatre Quarterly (TQ4, 1974), and twenty years on Peter Holland takes up the debate in the light of recent developments in sexual politics, critical approaches to gender – and, not least, the continuing and not always expected evolution of what remains a very live form indeed. Peter Holland is about to move from his present post as Judith E. Wilson Reader in Drama and Theatre in the Faculty of English at Cambridge to become the new Director of the Shakespeare Institute in Stratford. An earlier version of his present article was presented as a paper at the conference on ‘Eros e commedia sulla scena inglese’, at the Terza Università in Rome in December 1995.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 13 , Issue 51 , August 1997 , pp. 195 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes and References

1. ‘The Indispensable Pantomime Guide’, The Times, 22 November 1995, p. 37.

2. Nichols, Peter, Plays: Two (London, 1991), p. 407Google Scholar; on Poppy, see also Worthen, W. B., ‘Deciphering the British Pantomime: Poppy and the Rhetoric of Political Theatre’, Genre, XIX (1986), p. 173–91Google Scholar.

3. Nichols, Peter, Poppy (London, 1982), p. 31Google Scholar (the speech is cut from the revised version of the play in Nichols, Plays: Two).

4. Ibid.

5. Byng, Douglas, As You Were (London, 1970), p. 91Google Scholar.

6. See, for example, Garber, Chapter 7, and Baker, p. 172–83.

7. Quoted by Wilson, A. E. in his Pantomime Pageant (London, 1946), p. 119Google Scholar.

8. Quoted by Frow, Gerald, ‘Oh, Yes It Is!’: a History of Pantomime (London, 1985), p. 183Google Scholar.

9. Wilson, Pantomime Pageant, p. 119.

10. Wilson, A. E., Christmas Pantomime (London, 1934), p. 219Google Scholar.

11. Quoted by Frow, op. cit., p.183.

12. Quoted by Frow, op. cit., p.183–4.

13. On pantomime in this period, see also Booth, Michael R., ed., English Plays of the Nineteenth Century: Vol. 5, Pantomimes, Extravaganzas, and Burlesques (Oxford, 1976)Google Scholar, and Mander, Raymond and Mitchenson, Joe, Pantomime: a Story in Pictures (London, 1973)Google Scholar.

14. Mayer, David, ‘The Sexuality of Pantomime’, Theatre Quarterly, IV (1974), p. 55–64Google Scholar.

15. Morley, John, ‘How to Write a Pantomime’, in Pickering, David and Morley, John, Encyclopedia of Pantomime (Andover, 1993), p. xiGoogle Scholar.

16. Quoted in Wilson, Pantomime Pageant, p. 120.

17. Nichols, Plays: Two, p. 418–9.

18. See also Rose's song in Cregan's, DavidThe Sleeping Beauty (London, 1984)Google Scholar: ‘Give me my life/And I'll take it again from the start./If I could only be me.…/Let me be me’ (p. 26–7).

19. Nichols, Poppy, p. 31.

20. Wood, J. Hickory, Dan Leno (London, 1905), p. 119Google Scholar.

21. Ibid., p. 135.

22. Leno, Dan, Hys Booke, ed. Duncan, J. (London, 1968), p. 53Google Scholar.

23. See his autobiography, La Rue, Danny, From Drags to Riches (London, 1987)Google Scholar.

24. On ‘passing’ or ‘real disguise’, see Baker, Drag, p. 14–15. Baker discusses pantomime dames on p. 172–83. See also Moore, F. Michael, Drag! (Jefferson, N.C., 1994)Google Scholar.

25. Clinton-Baddeley, V. C., ‘Traditions of Pantomime’, in All Right on the Night (London, 1954), p. 223Google Scholar.

26. Ibid.

27. Everitt, Anthony, ‘George Lacy’, Panto!, No. 3 (1974), p. 15Google Scholar.

28. Marshall, Henry, ‘Author! Author!’, Panto!, No. 2 (1973), p. 13Google Scholar.

29. Quoted in Ferris, Lesley, ‘Introduction: Current Crossings’, in Crossing the Stage (London, 1993), p. 11Google Scholar.

30. Crocker, John, ‘Production Note’, Sinbad the Sailor (London, 1980), unpaginatedGoogle Scholar.

31. Ackroyd, Peter, Dressing Up (New York, 1979), p. 103–4Google Scholar.

32. See also the stock scene exploring a heap of underwear in Widow Twankey's laundry in Aladdin, e.g., Morley, John, Aladdin (1981), p. 22–4Google Scholar.

33. See, for example, MrsSinbad, in Sinbad the Sailor (1983)Google Scholar and Sarah, the Cook in Dick Whittington (1986)Google Scholar.

34. Adams, W. Davenport, ‘The Decline of the Pantomime’, The Theatre, 1 02 1882, p. 89Google Scholar.

35. Ibid.

36. Orwell, George, ‘The Art of Donald McGill’, in The Collected Essays, Journalism, and Letters of George Orwell, Vol. 2 (Harmondsworth, 1970), p. 183–95Google Scholar.

37. Shaw, G. B., Our Theatre in the Nineties, Vol. 3 (London, 1932), p. 279Google Scholar.

38. The anecdote is from Philip Hedley, Artistic Director of the Theatre Royal, Stratford East – it may well be true. Compare the following more certainly apocryphal story: ‘In one memorable event in a performance of King Cole, according to the actor who played the villain, he had the heroine unconscious on a sofa and uttered the line, ‘Ah, my fair Miranda, you know not what I have in mind’. Whereupon a voice called from the gallery, “Why don't you — her and get on with the pantomime!”’ See Kaplan, Charles, ‘The Only Native British Art Form’, Antioch Review, XLII (1984), p. 268Google Scholar.