Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T09:26:26.842Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Naming the Frame: the Role of the Pre-Interpretive in Theatrical Reception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 January 2009

Ian Watson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

When is a theatre event not a theatre event? Where, in the shifting relationships between (and even the shifting definitions of) actor and audience in modern and postmodern performance, is a useful line to be drawn – if only for purposes of analysis and discussion? How adequate are such traditional concepts as the ‘suspension of disbelief’, when the distinction between the ‘realities’ of the theatre and of the everyday begin to merge or dissolve? Ian Watson, an advisory editor of NTQ who teaches in the Department of Visual and Performing Arts at the Newark Campus of Rutgers University, New Jersey, here explores how the issue is affected by the differing pre-interpretive perspectives of performers and spectators. In this light he describes three recent theatre events – the Broadway production of Death and the Maiden, Harold Pinter's London production of Circe and Bravo, and an instance of Augusto Boal's ‘Invisible Theatre’ – to suggest that it is in these perceptual variations that the clue to understanding theatrical reality may lie.

Type
Research Article
Information
New Theatre Quarterly , Volume 13 , Issue 50 , May 1997 , pp. 161 - 170
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Selected Bibliography

Benedetti, Robert, Seeming! Being! and Becoming (New York: Drama Book Publishers, 1976).Google Scholar
Boal, Augusto, Games for Actors and Non-Actors (London; New York: Routledge, 1992).Google Scholar
Boal, Augusto, ‘Invisible Theatre: Liège, Belgium, 1978’, The Drama Review, XXXIV, No. 3 (1990), p. 24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brook, Peter, The Empty Space (New York: Atheneum, 1969).Google Scholar
García, Noemí Susana, and Panesi, Jorge, ‘La Confusión Entre Ficción y Realidad’, in Fausto by Estanislao del Campo (Buenos Aires, Argentina: Ediciones Colihue, 1991), p. 112–15.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford, ‘Deep Play: Notes on the Balinese Cockfight’, in The Interpretation of Cultures (New York: Basic Books, 1973).Google Scholar
Gnoli, Raniero, The Aesthetic Experience according to Abhinavagupta (Rome: Serie Orientale, Vol. XI, 1956).Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving, Frame Analysis (Boston: Northeastern University Press, 1986).Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving, The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life (New York: Anchor Books, 1959).Google Scholar
Grotowski, Jerzy, Towards a Poor Theatre (New York: Simon and Schuster, 1968).Google Scholar
Hulser, Kathleen, ‘Scenes From Surreal America’, American Theatre, III, No. 3 (06 1986), p. 19–23, 42.Google Scholar
Kohtes, Martin Maria, ‘Invisible Theatre: Reflections on an Overlooked Form’, New Theatre Quarterly, IX, No. 3 (02 1993), p. 85–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, Benedict, ‘Death and the Maiden Becomes a Tale of Two Cities’, New York Times, Arts Section, 10 05 1992, p. 14, 34.Google Scholar
Raymond, Gerard, ‘Ariel Dorfman in Exile,’ Theatre Week, V, No. 34 (30 03 1992), p. 12–17.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard, Between Theatre and Anthropology (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schechner, Richard, ‘Anthropological Analysis’, The Drama Review, XXII, No. 3 (1978), p. 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Victor, The Anthropology of Performance (New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications, 1986).Google Scholar
Turner, Victor, From Ritual to Theatre (New York: Performing Arts Journal Publications, 1982).Google Scholar