Article contents
Dramas of the Performative Society: Theatre at the End of its Tether
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 January 2009
Abstract
The emergence of new performance paradigms in the second half of the twentieth century is only now being recognized as a fresh phase in human history. The creation of the new discipline, or, as some would call it, the anti-discipline of performance studies in universities is just a small chapter in a ubiquitous story. Everywhere performance is becoming a key quality of endeavour, whether in science and technology, commerce and industry, government and civics, or humanities and the arts. We are experiencing the creation of what Baz Kershaw here calls the ‘performative society’ – a society in which the human is crucially constituted through performance. But in such a society, what happens to the traditional notions and practices of drama and theatre? In this inaugural lecture, Kershaw looks for signs and portents of the future of drama and theatre in the performative society, finds mostly dissolution and deep panic, and tentatively suggests the need for a radical turn that will embrace the promiscuity of performance. Baz Kershaw, currently Professor of Drama at the University of Bristol, trained and worked as a design engineer before reading English and Philosophy at Manchester University. He has had extensive experience as a director and writer in radical theatre, including productions at the Drury Lane Arts Lab and with the Devon-based group Medium Fair, where he founded the first reminiscence theatre company Fair Old Times. His latest book is The Radical in Performance (Routledge, 1999). More recently he wrote about the ecologies of performance in NTQ 62.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2001
References
Notes and References
1. Hay, Peter, Theatrical Anecdotes (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1972), p. 342–3Google Scholar.
2. Brandreth, , Giles, , Great Theatrical Disasters (London: Grafton Books, 1986), p. 20Google Scholar.
3. Hay, op. cit., p. 263–4.
4. Williams, Raymond, Writing in Society (London: Verso, 1991), p. 11Google Scholar.
5. Arts Council of England, Boyden Report (London: Arts Council, 1999), p. 10Google Scholar.
6. Arts Council of England, ‘£100 Million More for Arts’, Arts Council News, 08 2000, p. 1Google Scholar.
7. Ansorge, Peter, From Liverpool to Los Angeles: on Writing for Theatre, Film, and Television (London: Faber and Faber, 1997), p. x, 134Google Scholar.
8. Gottlieb, Vera and Chambers, Colin, ed., Theatre in a Cool Climate (Oxford: Amber Lane Press, 1999), p. 109Google Scholar.
9. Kustow, Michael, Theatre@Risk (London: Methuen, 2000), p. xiiiGoogle Scholar.
10. Eyre, Richard and Wright, Nicholas, Changing Stages: a View of British Theatre in the Twentieth Century (London: Bloomsbury, 2000), p. 378Google Scholar.
11. Gottlieb and Chambers, op. cit., p. 109–10.
12. Kustow, op. cit., p. 206.
13. Smith, Anthony, Software for the Self: Culture and Technology (London: Faber and Faber, 1996), p. 96Google Scholar.
- 9
- Cited by