Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T01:02:15.010Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Traditions in Ephesians*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2009

Markus Barth
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ephesians is a most rewarding, pehaps inexhaustible hunting ground for everyone eager to detect traditions whose forms and contents were used in the composition of a New Testament book. While a quotation formula (‘he, or, it says’) is used only twice in Ephesians, in 4. 8 for a biblical Psalm and in 5. 14 for an awakening call of debatable origin, unmarked quotations and allusions abound. They stem from oral and written, hymnic and pose, liturgical and ethical, and perhaps mystical and proverbial traditions.

Type
Articles
Information
New Testament Studies , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 1984 , pp. 3 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

See the bibliographical appendix for title and page references concerning this and other authors mentioned in the following.

LITERATURE MENTIONED Aristotle, politica I 1259B

Barth, M., Ephesians, Anchor Bible, New York 1974, 1 pp. 109–12, 276–9; 2, pp. 472–7, 720–38Google Scholar

Bianchi, U., The Origins of Gnosticism, Leiden: Brill, 1967Google Scholar

Bousset, W., Kyrios Christos, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck 1935, p. 234Google Scholar

Bultmann, R., Theology of the New Testament, New York: Scribners 1955, 2 pp. 142–4; 1 p. 51, 164–83Google Scholar

Calvin, J., Commentaries in ep. Pauli ad Ephesios, Corp. Ref., Calvini opera LI, 1895, p. 203 on Eph. 4.17Google Scholar

Colpe, C., Die Religionsgeschichtliche Schule 1, FRLANT 78, 1961Google Scholar

Coutts, J., ‘The Relationship of Ephesians and Colossians’, NTS 4 (1957/1958), pp. 201–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Deichgräber, R., Gotteshymnus und Christushymnus, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck 1967Google Scholar

Dibelius, M., ‘Die Isisweihe bei Apuleius’, in Botschaft und Geschichte 2, Tübingen: Mohr, 1956, pp. 30–79Google Scholar

Dibelius, M. und Greeven, H., An die Kolosser, Epheser, an Philemon, Tübingen: Mohr 1953, pp. 48–50Google Scholar

Dupont, J., Gnosis. Louvain: Nouvelaert, 1949, p. 245, 419 ff., 446 ff. etc.Google Scholar

3 Enoch XII 4–5Google Scholar

Gnilka, J., Der Epheserbrief, Freiburg: Herder 1971, pp. 21–29Google Scholar

idem, ‘Paränetische Traditionen im Epheserbrief’, in eds. Descamps, A. and de Halleux, A., Mélanges Bibliques, FS B. Rigaux, Gembloux: Duclot 1970, pp. 297–410Google Scholar

Goodspeed, E. J., The Key to Ephesians, Chicago, University Press 1956, pp. XIII-XVIGoogle Scholar

Goodwin, C., ‘How Did John Treat His Sources?’ JBL 73 (1954), pp. 61–75, 150 ff.Google Scholar

Hegermann, H., Die Vorstellung vom Schöpfungsmittler, Berlin: Akademie-Verlag, 1961Google Scholar

Heraklitos, frgm. 1; 31; 67; etc., in Diels, H., Die Fragmente der Vorsokratiker 1, Berlin: Weidmann 1934Google Scholar

Holtzmann, H. J., Kritik der Epheser- und Kolosserbriefe, Leipzig: Engelmann 1872Google Scholar

Ignatius, , Eph. XIX, 129, 162 f.Google Scholar

Josephus, , bell. II, 119, 166Google Scholar

Martyr, Justin, dial. 56, apol. 1 13Google Scholar

Käsemann, E., Leib und Leib Christi. Tübingen: Mohr 1933Google Scholar

idem, ‘Epheserbrief’, in RGG 2, 1958, pp. 517–20Google Scholar

idem, ‘Ephesians and Acts’, in eds. Keck, L. E. and Martyn, J. L., Studies in Luke-Acts, FS F. Schubert. Nashville: Abingdon 1966, pp. 288–97Google Scholar

idem, An die Römer, Tübingen: Mohr 1973, pp. 134–5Google Scholar

Kirby, J. C., Ephesians, Baptism and Pentecost, Montreal: McGill Univ. Press 1978, pp. 150–61Google Scholar

Kuhn, K. G., ‘Der Epheserbrief im Lichte der Qumrantexte’, NTS 7 (1960/1961), pp. 334–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar; engl. tr. in ed. Murphy-O'Connor, , Paul and Qumran, Chicago: Priory Press 1968Google Scholar

Lewis, C. S., Fern-seed and Elephants, London: Fontana 1975, first essayGoogle Scholar

Lohse, E., Colossians and Philemon, Philadelphia: Fortress Press 1971, pp. 181–2Google Scholar

Ludwig, H., Der Verfasser des Kolosserbriefes, diss. Göttingen 1974, pp. 193–231Google Scholar

Martin, R. P., Reconciliation, Atlanta: J. Knox 1980, pp. 157–92Google Scholar

Masson, Ch., L'épitre de St. Paul aux Ephésiens, Neuchâtel/Paris: Delachaux 1953Google Scholar

Maurer, C., ‘Der Hymnus von Eph 1 als Schlüssel zum ganzen Brief’, EvTh 11 (1951/1952) pp. 151–72Google Scholar

Moule, C. F. D., The Epistles to the Colossians and Philemon Cambridge Greek Testament, 1968, pp. 60–2Google Scholar

Norden, E., Agnostos Theos, Stuttgart: Teubner, 1912, repr. 1956, p. 254 etc.Google Scholar

Origen, c. Celsum V 38Google Scholar

Pagels, E. H., The Gnostic Paul, Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1975, pp. 115–33Google Scholar

Percy, E., Die Probleme der Kolosser- und Epheserbriefe, Lund: Gleerup, 1946, pp. 179 ff. etc.Google Scholar

Philo, qu. in Gen. II 62Google Scholar; op. mundi 134–47Google Scholar; leg. all. I 31–32Google Scholar; II 4 etc.; on Philo's thought about Mysteries and The Mystery see references collected by Goodenough, E. R., By Light, Light New Haven: Yale Univ. Press 1935, pp. 235–64Google Scholar; Wolfson, H. A., Philo 1, Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univ. Press 1948, pp. 36–55Google Scholar

Plutarch, moralia 143B; 144FGoogle Scholar

Pokorný, P., Der Epheserbrief und die Gnosis, Berlin: Evang. Verlagsanstalt, 1965Google Scholar

Quispel, G., ‘Christliche Gnosis und jüdische Heterodoxie’, EvTh 14 (1954), pp. 474–84Google Scholar

Robinson, J. A., St. Paul's Epistle to the Ephesians, London: J. Clarke & Co., 2nd. ed. 1922, p. 238 etc.Google Scholar

Robinson, J. M., ‘Die Hodayoth-Formel’, in FS E. Haenchen, Berlin: Töpelmann, 1964, pp. 194–235Google Scholar

Roon, A. v., The Authenticity of Ephesians, Leiden: Brill, 1974, pp. 394–412, 201 etc.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sanders, J. T., ‘Hymnie Elements in Eph. 1–3’, ZNW 50 (1965), pp. 214–32Google Scholar

Schenke, H. M., Der Gott ‘Mensch’ in der Gnosis, Göttingen: Vandenhoeck, 1962Google Scholar

Schille, G., Frühchristliche Hymnen, Berlin: Evang. Verlagsanstalt 1965Google Scholar

Schlier, H., Der Brief an die Epheser, Düsseldorf: Patmos, 2nd. ed. 1958, p. 140Google Scholar

Schmithals, W., Gnosticism in Corinth, Nashville: Abingdon, 1971Google Scholar

idem, Paulus und die Gnostiker, Hamburg: H. Reich, 1965Google Scholar

Seeberg, A., Der Katechismus der Urchristenheit, Leipzig: Deichert, 1903Google Scholar

Seiterle, G., ‘Artemis, Die grosse Göttin von Ephesus’, Antike Welt 10 (1979), pp. 3–16Google Scholar

Aquinas, Thomas, Commentary on … Ephesians, tr. by Lamb, M. L., Albany: Magi Books 1966, p. 224Google Scholar

Trent, Council of, sessio IV, deer. de S. Scriptura 1546, in Denzinger-Schönmetzer, Enchiridion Symbolorum, Freiburg: Herder, 24th ed. 1967, #1501; cf. 3006Google Scholar

Vögtle, A., Die Tugend- und Lasterkataloge im Neuen Testament, Münster: Aschendorff, 1936Google Scholar

Wengst, K., Christologische Formeln und Lieder des Urchristentums, Gütersloh: Mohn, 1972Google Scholar

Wibbing, S., ‘Die Tugend- und Lasterkataloge im NT’, BhZNW 25 (1959), p. 112Google Scholar