No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 February 2009
In the early 1950s a cartoon appeared in Punch depicting a British motorist able at last to resume touring the continent after World War II. The first scene shows a straight, tree-lined chaussée, with the driver saying to his passenger, ‘Now for these lovely straight French roads’. In the next scene they quickly come to a barrier with the warning, ‘Déviation 19 kilomètres’.
[1] For a critique of the term ‘biblical theology movement’ see Smart, James D., The Past, Present and Future of Biblical Theology (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1979), esp. chapter 1Google Scholar, ‘The “Movement” That Was Not a Movement’, pp. 9–17.Google Scholar
[2] Lampe, G. W. H., ‘Salvation: Traditions and Re-appraisals’, Queen's Essays (Birmingham: Queen's College, 1980), pp. 63–80Google Scholar. Cf. Wilkinson, Alan in Theology 6 (1983), p. 114Google Scholar: ‘I have since realized that the radicals of the 60s were in effect tackling the unfinished theological business and ethical agenda created by the First World War, but evaded by neo-orthodoxy.‘
[3] JR (1961), pp. 194–205.Google Scholar
[4] Barr, James, Semantics of Biblical Language (Oxford: University Press, 1961), pp. 195–7.Google Scholar
[5] Barr, James, The Bible in the Modern World (New York: Harper & Row, 1973), p. 5.Google Scholar
[6] Childs, Brevard, Biblical Theology in Crisis (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1970), esp. pp. 61–87Google Scholar. Childs however does call for a ‘new Biblical Theology’, pp. 91–122.Google Scholar
[7] Edwyn Clement Hoskyns & Francis Noel Davey, Crucifixion-Resurrection (London: SPCK, 1981)Google Scholar. This doubly posthumous work is scrappy, ill-organized and incomplete, but, as we hope to show, contains brilliant flashes of insight.
[8] Barrett, C. K., ‘What is New Testament Theology? Some Reflections’, Horizons in Biblical Theology 3 (1981), pp. 1–22. So already Smyth, p. xx.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Nineham, Dennis, The Use and Abuse of the Bible: A study of the Bible in an age of rapid cultural change (Library of Philosophy and Religion; London: Macmillan, 1976), pp. 1–39.Google Scholar
[10] Hamerton-Kelly, R., God the Father: Theology and Patriarchy in the Teaching of Jesus (Overtures to Biblical Theology; Philadelphia: Fortress, 1979)Google Scholar. ‘An Excursus on Method: Symbol and History in Modern Hermeneutics’, pp, 105–22.Google Scholar
[11] Grimm, W., Die Verkündigung Jesu und Deutero-Jesaja (ANTJ 1: Frankfurt am Main/Bern: Lang, 2 1981).Google Scholar
[12] Harvey, A. E., Jesus and the Constraints of History (Philadelphia: Westminster, 1982), p. 258.Google Scholar
[13] Lindemann, H. Conzelmann-A., Arbeitsbuch des Neuen Testaments (Tübingen: Mohr, 6 1982), p. 258.Google Scholar
[14] Schniewind, J., Das Evangelium nach Markus (NTD 1; Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 5 1949), p.55.Google Scholar
[15] Rochais, G., Les récits de résurrection des marts dans le Nouveau Testament (SNTSMS 40; Cambridge: University Press, 1981), p. 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16] Hoskyns, E. C., The Fourth Gospel (Ed. Davey, F. N.; London: Faber & Faber, 1 1940), 1: pp. 162–3.Google Scholar
[17] Beker, J. C., Paul the Apostle: The Triumph of God in Life and Thought (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1980).Google Scholar
[18] Hoskyns, E. C., Cambridge Sermons (London: SPCK, 1938), pp. 26–7.Google Scholar